Cargando…

Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses

Teledermatology is assuming a progressively greater role as a healthcare delivery method, especially now, during this pandemic time. It is important to know how accurate this tool is for different skin diseases. Most of the studies have focused on skin neoplasms or general dermatology. Studies based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giavina-Bianchi, Mara, Sousa, Raquel, Cordioli, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585792
_version_ 1783607907381673984
author Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
Sousa, Raquel
Cordioli, Eduardo
author_facet Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
Sousa, Raquel
Cordioli, Eduardo
author_sort Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
collection PubMed
description Teledermatology is assuming a progressively greater role as a healthcare delivery method, especially now, during this pandemic time. It is important to know how accurate this tool is for different skin diseases. Most of the studies have focused on skin neoplasms or general dermatology. Studies based on a large number of inflammatory dermatoses have not yet been performed. Such knowledge can help dermatologists to decide whether endorsing this method or not. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of teledermatology in inflammatory dermatoses in a robust number of cases. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, from July 2017–18, where a store-and-forward Teledermatology project was implemented under primary-care attention to triage surgical, more complex, or severe dermatoses. A total of 30,976 patients presenting 55,012 lesions took part in the project. Thirteen participating teledermatologists had three options to refer the patients: directly to biopsy, to the in-person dermatologist or back to the general physician with most probable diagnosis and management. In the group referred to the in-person dermatologist, we looked for the 20 most frequent International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems- 10th revision (ICD-10) of inflammatory dermatoses, which resulted in 739 patients and 739 lesions. As patients had been triaged by teledermatology previously, we were able to compare ICD-10 codes filled both by teledermatogists and by in-person dermatologists. The proportion of complete, partial, and no agreement rates between the in-person dermatologist's and the teledermatologist's diagnoses was used for accuracy. We also calculated Cohen's kappa, a statistical measure of inter-rater agreement, for complete agreement. The mean complete agreement rate for all twenty dermatoses was 78% (31–100%) and kappa = 0.743; partial agreement 8%; and no agreement 14%, presenting variability according to the disease. Our study showed that teledermatology for inflammatory dermatoses has a high accuracy. This result reassures that it can be a proper option for patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7653494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76534942020-11-13 Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses Giavina-Bianchi, Mara Sousa, Raquel Cordioli, Eduardo Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Teledermatology is assuming a progressively greater role as a healthcare delivery method, especially now, during this pandemic time. It is important to know how accurate this tool is for different skin diseases. Most of the studies have focused on skin neoplasms or general dermatology. Studies based on a large number of inflammatory dermatoses have not yet been performed. Such knowledge can help dermatologists to decide whether endorsing this method or not. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of teledermatology in inflammatory dermatoses in a robust number of cases. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, from July 2017–18, where a store-and-forward Teledermatology project was implemented under primary-care attention to triage surgical, more complex, or severe dermatoses. A total of 30,976 patients presenting 55,012 lesions took part in the project. Thirteen participating teledermatologists had three options to refer the patients: directly to biopsy, to the in-person dermatologist or back to the general physician with most probable diagnosis and management. In the group referred to the in-person dermatologist, we looked for the 20 most frequent International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems- 10th revision (ICD-10) of inflammatory dermatoses, which resulted in 739 patients and 739 lesions. As patients had been triaged by teledermatology previously, we were able to compare ICD-10 codes filled both by teledermatogists and by in-person dermatologists. The proportion of complete, partial, and no agreement rates between the in-person dermatologist's and the teledermatologist's diagnoses was used for accuracy. We also calculated Cohen's kappa, a statistical measure of inter-rater agreement, for complete agreement. The mean complete agreement rate for all twenty dermatoses was 78% (31–100%) and kappa = 0.743; partial agreement 8%; and no agreement 14%, presenting variability according to the disease. Our study showed that teledermatology for inflammatory dermatoses has a high accuracy. This result reassures that it can be a proper option for patient care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7653494/ /pubmed/33195344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585792 Text en Copyright © 2020 Giavina-Bianchi, Sousa and Cordioli. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Giavina-Bianchi, Mara
Sousa, Raquel
Cordioli, Eduardo
Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses
title Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses
title_full Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses
title_fullStr Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses
title_full_unstemmed Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses
title_short Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses
title_sort part i: accuracy of teledermatology in inflammatory dermatoses
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585792
work_keys_str_mv AT giavinabianchimara partiaccuracyofteledermatologyininflammatorydermatoses
AT sousaraquel partiaccuracyofteledermatologyininflammatorydermatoses
AT cordiolieduardo partiaccuracyofteledermatologyininflammatorydermatoses