Cargando…
Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses
Teledermatology is assuming a progressively greater role as a healthcare delivery method, especially now, during this pandemic time. It is important to know how accurate this tool is for different skin diseases. Most of the studies have focused on skin neoplasms or general dermatology. Studies based...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585792 |
_version_ | 1783607907381673984 |
---|---|
author | Giavina-Bianchi, Mara Sousa, Raquel Cordioli, Eduardo |
author_facet | Giavina-Bianchi, Mara Sousa, Raquel Cordioli, Eduardo |
author_sort | Giavina-Bianchi, Mara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Teledermatology is assuming a progressively greater role as a healthcare delivery method, especially now, during this pandemic time. It is important to know how accurate this tool is for different skin diseases. Most of the studies have focused on skin neoplasms or general dermatology. Studies based on a large number of inflammatory dermatoses have not yet been performed. Such knowledge can help dermatologists to decide whether endorsing this method or not. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of teledermatology in inflammatory dermatoses in a robust number of cases. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, from July 2017–18, where a store-and-forward Teledermatology project was implemented under primary-care attention to triage surgical, more complex, or severe dermatoses. A total of 30,976 patients presenting 55,012 lesions took part in the project. Thirteen participating teledermatologists had three options to refer the patients: directly to biopsy, to the in-person dermatologist or back to the general physician with most probable diagnosis and management. In the group referred to the in-person dermatologist, we looked for the 20 most frequent International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems- 10th revision (ICD-10) of inflammatory dermatoses, which resulted in 739 patients and 739 lesions. As patients had been triaged by teledermatology previously, we were able to compare ICD-10 codes filled both by teledermatogists and by in-person dermatologists. The proportion of complete, partial, and no agreement rates between the in-person dermatologist's and the teledermatologist's diagnoses was used for accuracy. We also calculated Cohen's kappa, a statistical measure of inter-rater agreement, for complete agreement. The mean complete agreement rate for all twenty dermatoses was 78% (31–100%) and kappa = 0.743; partial agreement 8%; and no agreement 14%, presenting variability according to the disease. Our study showed that teledermatology for inflammatory dermatoses has a high accuracy. This result reassures that it can be a proper option for patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7653494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76534942020-11-13 Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses Giavina-Bianchi, Mara Sousa, Raquel Cordioli, Eduardo Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Teledermatology is assuming a progressively greater role as a healthcare delivery method, especially now, during this pandemic time. It is important to know how accurate this tool is for different skin diseases. Most of the studies have focused on skin neoplasms or general dermatology. Studies based on a large number of inflammatory dermatoses have not yet been performed. Such knowledge can help dermatologists to decide whether endorsing this method or not. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of teledermatology in inflammatory dermatoses in a robust number of cases. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, from July 2017–18, where a store-and-forward Teledermatology project was implemented under primary-care attention to triage surgical, more complex, or severe dermatoses. A total of 30,976 patients presenting 55,012 lesions took part in the project. Thirteen participating teledermatologists had three options to refer the patients: directly to biopsy, to the in-person dermatologist or back to the general physician with most probable diagnosis and management. In the group referred to the in-person dermatologist, we looked for the 20 most frequent International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems- 10th revision (ICD-10) of inflammatory dermatoses, which resulted in 739 patients and 739 lesions. As patients had been triaged by teledermatology previously, we were able to compare ICD-10 codes filled both by teledermatogists and by in-person dermatologists. The proportion of complete, partial, and no agreement rates between the in-person dermatologist's and the teledermatologist's diagnoses was used for accuracy. We also calculated Cohen's kappa, a statistical measure of inter-rater agreement, for complete agreement. The mean complete agreement rate for all twenty dermatoses was 78% (31–100%) and kappa = 0.743; partial agreement 8%; and no agreement 14%, presenting variability according to the disease. Our study showed that teledermatology for inflammatory dermatoses has a high accuracy. This result reassures that it can be a proper option for patient care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7653494/ /pubmed/33195344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585792 Text en Copyright © 2020 Giavina-Bianchi, Sousa and Cordioli. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Giavina-Bianchi, Mara Sousa, Raquel Cordioli, Eduardo Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses |
title | Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses |
title_full | Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses |
title_fullStr | Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses |
title_full_unstemmed | Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses |
title_short | Part I: Accuracy of Teledermatology in Inflammatory Dermatoses |
title_sort | part i: accuracy of teledermatology in inflammatory dermatoses |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585792 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giavinabianchimara partiaccuracyofteledermatologyininflammatorydermatoses AT sousaraquel partiaccuracyofteledermatologyininflammatorydermatoses AT cordiolieduardo partiaccuracyofteledermatologyininflammatorydermatoses |