Cargando…
Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures
BACKGROUND: Instrumented pendulum test is an objective and repeatable biomechanical method of assessment for spasticity. However, multitude of sensor technologies and plenty of suggested outcome measures, confuse those interested in implementing this method in practice. Lack of a standard agreement...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00826-8 |
_version_ | 1783607938950103040 |
---|---|
author | Rahimi, Fariborz Eyvazpour, Reza Salahshour, Nazila Azghani, Mahmood Reza |
author_facet | Rahimi, Fariborz Eyvazpour, Reza Salahshour, Nazila Azghani, Mahmood Reza |
author_sort | Rahimi, Fariborz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Instrumented pendulum test is an objective and repeatable biomechanical method of assessment for spasticity. However, multitude of sensor technologies and plenty of suggested outcome measures, confuse those interested in implementing this method in practice. Lack of a standard agreement on the definition of experimental setup and outcome measures adds to this ambiguity and causes the results of one study not to be directly attainable by a group that uses a different setup. In this systematic review of studies, we aim to reduce the confusion by providing pros and cons of the available choices, and also by standardizing the definitions. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for the period of 1950 to the end of 2019 on PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and IEEE explore; with keywords of “pendulum test” and “Spasticity”. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies with instrumented pendulum test for assessment of spasticity met the inclusion criteria. All the suggested methods of implementation were compared and advantages and disadvantages were provided for each sensor technology. An exhaustive list categorized outcome measures in three groups of angle-based, angular velocity-based, and angular acceleration-based measures with all different names and definitions. CONCLUSIONS: With the aim of providing standardized methodology with replicable and comparable results, sources of dissimilarity and ambiguity among research strategies were found and explained with the help of graphical representation of pendulum movement stages and corresponding parameters on the angular waveforms. We hope using the provided tables simplify the choices when implementing pendulum test for spasticity evaluation, improve the consistency when reporting the results, and disambiguate inconsistency in the literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7653760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76537602020-11-16 Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures Rahimi, Fariborz Eyvazpour, Reza Salahshour, Nazila Azghani, Mahmood Reza Biomed Eng Online Review BACKGROUND: Instrumented pendulum test is an objective and repeatable biomechanical method of assessment for spasticity. However, multitude of sensor technologies and plenty of suggested outcome measures, confuse those interested in implementing this method in practice. Lack of a standard agreement on the definition of experimental setup and outcome measures adds to this ambiguity and causes the results of one study not to be directly attainable by a group that uses a different setup. In this systematic review of studies, we aim to reduce the confusion by providing pros and cons of the available choices, and also by standardizing the definitions. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for the period of 1950 to the end of 2019 on PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and IEEE explore; with keywords of “pendulum test” and “Spasticity”. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies with instrumented pendulum test for assessment of spasticity met the inclusion criteria. All the suggested methods of implementation were compared and advantages and disadvantages were provided for each sensor technology. An exhaustive list categorized outcome measures in three groups of angle-based, angular velocity-based, and angular acceleration-based measures with all different names and definitions. CONCLUSIONS: With the aim of providing standardized methodology with replicable and comparable results, sources of dissimilarity and ambiguity among research strategies were found and explained with the help of graphical representation of pendulum movement stages and corresponding parameters on the angular waveforms. We hope using the provided tables simplify the choices when implementing pendulum test for spasticity evaluation, improve the consistency when reporting the results, and disambiguate inconsistency in the literature. BioMed Central 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7653760/ /pubmed/33168030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00826-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Rahimi, Fariborz Eyvazpour, Reza Salahshour, Nazila Azghani, Mahmood Reza Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures |
title | Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures |
title_full | Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures |
title_fullStr | Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures |
title_short | Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures |
title_sort | objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00826-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahimifariborz objectiveassessmentofspasticitybypendulumtestasystematicreviewonmethodsofimplementationandoutcomemeasures AT eyvazpourreza objectiveassessmentofspasticitybypendulumtestasystematicreviewonmethodsofimplementationandoutcomemeasures AT salahshournazila objectiveassessmentofspasticitybypendulumtestasystematicreviewonmethodsofimplementationandoutcomemeasures AT azghanimahmoodreza objectiveassessmentofspasticitybypendulumtestasystematicreviewonmethodsofimplementationandoutcomemeasures |