Cargando…

Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control

BACKGROUND: With an increasing clinical importance of the treatment of the heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it is important to be certain of the diagnosis of HF. We investigated global and regional left ventricular (LV) strains using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyung Yoon, Park, Sung-Ji, Lee, Sang-Chol, Chang, Shin Yi, Kim, Eun-Kyoung, Chang, Sung-A, Choi, Jin-Oh, Park, Seung Woo, Kim, Sung-Mok, Choe, Yeon Hyeon, Oh, Jae K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00223-0
_version_ 1783607957220491264
author Kim, Hyung Yoon
Park, Sung-Ji
Lee, Sang-Chol
Chang, Shin Yi
Kim, Eun-Kyoung
Chang, Sung-A
Choi, Jin-Oh
Park, Seung Woo
Kim, Sung-Mok
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Oh, Jae K.
author_facet Kim, Hyung Yoon
Park, Sung-Ji
Lee, Sang-Chol
Chang, Shin Yi
Kim, Eun-Kyoung
Chang, Sung-A
Choi, Jin-Oh
Park, Seung Woo
Kim, Sung-Mok
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Oh, Jae K.
author_sort Kim, Hyung Yoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With an increasing clinical importance of the treatment of the heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it is important to be certain of the diagnosis of HF. We investigated global and regional left ventricular (LV) strains using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in patients with HFpEF and compared those parameters with that of patients with hypertension and normal subjects. METHODS: Peak longitudinal, circumferential and radial strains were assessed globally and regionally for each study groups using STE. Diastolic strain rate was also determined. RESULTS: There were 50 patients in HFpEF group, 56 patients in hypertension group and 46 age-matched normal subjects. In patients with HFpEF, global peak longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain and strain rate were reduced compared to both hypertension patients and normal controls (− 15.5 ± 5.3 vs − 17.7 ± 3.1 and − 19.9 ± 2.0; − 9.7 ± 2.2 vs − 19.3 ± 3.1 and − 20.5 ± 3.3; 17.7 ± 8.2 vs 38.4 ± 12.4 and 43.6 ± 11.9, respectively, P <  0.001, for all). The diagnostic performance of global circumferential strain to predict the HFpEF was greatest among strain parameters (area under the curve = 0.997). CONCLUSIONS: In the speckle tracking echocardiography, impaired peak global strain and homogeneously reduced regional strain was observed in HFpEF patients compared to the hypertension patients and normal subjects in decreasing order. This can provide early information on the initiation of LV deformation of HFpEF in patients with hypertension or normal subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7653846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76538462020-11-16 Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control Kim, Hyung Yoon Park, Sung-Ji Lee, Sang-Chol Chang, Shin Yi Kim, Eun-Kyoung Chang, Sung-A Choi, Jin-Oh Park, Seung Woo Kim, Sung-Mok Choe, Yeon Hyeon Oh, Jae K. Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: With an increasing clinical importance of the treatment of the heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it is important to be certain of the diagnosis of HF. We investigated global and regional left ventricular (LV) strains using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in patients with HFpEF and compared those parameters with that of patients with hypertension and normal subjects. METHODS: Peak longitudinal, circumferential and radial strains were assessed globally and regionally for each study groups using STE. Diastolic strain rate was also determined. RESULTS: There were 50 patients in HFpEF group, 56 patients in hypertension group and 46 age-matched normal subjects. In patients with HFpEF, global peak longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain and strain rate were reduced compared to both hypertension patients and normal controls (− 15.5 ± 5.3 vs − 17.7 ± 3.1 and − 19.9 ± 2.0; − 9.7 ± 2.2 vs − 19.3 ± 3.1 and − 20.5 ± 3.3; 17.7 ± 8.2 vs 38.4 ± 12.4 and 43.6 ± 11.9, respectively, P <  0.001, for all). The diagnostic performance of global circumferential strain to predict the HFpEF was greatest among strain parameters (area under the curve = 0.997). CONCLUSIONS: In the speckle tracking echocardiography, impaired peak global strain and homogeneously reduced regional strain was observed in HFpEF patients compared to the hypertension patients and normal subjects in decreasing order. This can provide early information on the initiation of LV deformation of HFpEF in patients with hypertension or normal subjects. BioMed Central 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7653846/ /pubmed/33172479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00223-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Hyung Yoon
Park, Sung-Ji
Lee, Sang-Chol
Chang, Shin Yi
Kim, Eun-Kyoung
Chang, Sung-A
Choi, Jin-Oh
Park, Seung Woo
Kim, Sung-Mok
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Oh, Jae K.
Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control
title Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control
title_full Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control
title_fullStr Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control
title_short Comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control
title_sort comparison of global and regional myocardial strains in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction vs hypertension vs age-matched control
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-020-00223-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyungyoon comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT parksungji comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT leesangchol comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT changshinyi comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT kimeunkyoung comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT changsunga comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT choijinoh comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT parkseungwoo comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT kimsungmok comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT choeyeonhyeon comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol
AT ohjaek comparisonofglobalandregionalmyocardialstrainsinpatientswithheartfailurewithapreservedejectionfractionvshypertensionvsagematchedcontrol