Cargando…
Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions
BACKGROUND: Agitation among patients is a common and distressing behaviour across a variety of health care settings, particularly inpatient mental health. Unless recognised early and effectively managed it can lead to aggression and personal injury. The aim of this paper is to explore the experience...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00495-x |
_version_ | 1783607963409186816 |
---|---|
author | Tucker, Joshua Whitehead, Lisa Palamara, Peter Rosman, Josephine Xenia Seaman, Karla |
author_facet | Tucker, Joshua Whitehead, Lisa Palamara, Peter Rosman, Josephine Xenia Seaman, Karla |
author_sort | Tucker, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Agitation among patients is a common and distressing behaviour across a variety of health care settings, particularly inpatient mental health. Unless recognised early and effectively managed it can lead to aggression and personal injury. The aim of this paper is to explore the experiences of mental health nurses in recognising and managing agitation in an inpatient mental health setting and the alignment of these experiences with best practice and person-centred care. METHODS: This study used a descriptive qualitative methodology. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 20 nurses working in a mental health unit in 2018. Nursing staff described their experiences of assessing and managing agitation. Descriptive and Thematic Analysis were undertaken of the transcribed focus group dialogue. RESULTS: Nurses combined their clinical knowledge, assessment protocols and training with information from patients to make an individualised assessment of agitation. Nurses also adopted an individualised approach to management by engaging patients in decisions about their care. In keeping with best practice recommendations, de-escalation strategies were the first choice option for management, though nurses also described using both coercive restraint and medication under certain circumstances. From the perspective of patient-centred care, the care provided aligned with elements of person-centred care nursing care. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that clinical mental health nurses assess and manage agitation, with certain exceptions, in line with best practice and a person-centred care nursing framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7653876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76538762020-11-10 Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions Tucker, Joshua Whitehead, Lisa Palamara, Peter Rosman, Josephine Xenia Seaman, Karla BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Agitation among patients is a common and distressing behaviour across a variety of health care settings, particularly inpatient mental health. Unless recognised early and effectively managed it can lead to aggression and personal injury. The aim of this paper is to explore the experiences of mental health nurses in recognising and managing agitation in an inpatient mental health setting and the alignment of these experiences with best practice and person-centred care. METHODS: This study used a descriptive qualitative methodology. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 20 nurses working in a mental health unit in 2018. Nursing staff described their experiences of assessing and managing agitation. Descriptive and Thematic Analysis were undertaken of the transcribed focus group dialogue. RESULTS: Nurses combined their clinical knowledge, assessment protocols and training with information from patients to make an individualised assessment of agitation. Nurses also adopted an individualised approach to management by engaging patients in decisions about their care. In keeping with best practice recommendations, de-escalation strategies were the first choice option for management, though nurses also described using both coercive restraint and medication under certain circumstances. From the perspective of patient-centred care, the care provided aligned with elements of person-centred care nursing care. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that clinical mental health nurses assess and manage agitation, with certain exceptions, in line with best practice and a person-centred care nursing framework. BioMed Central 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7653876/ /pubmed/33292208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00495-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tucker, Joshua Whitehead, Lisa Palamara, Peter Rosman, Josephine Xenia Seaman, Karla Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions |
title | Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions |
title_full | Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions |
title_fullStr | Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions |
title_full_unstemmed | Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions |
title_short | Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions |
title_sort | recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00495-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuckerjoshua recognitionandmanagementofagitationinacutementalhealthservicesaqualitativeevaluationofstaffperceptions AT whiteheadlisa recognitionandmanagementofagitationinacutementalhealthservicesaqualitativeevaluationofstaffperceptions AT palamarapeter recognitionandmanagementofagitationinacutementalhealthservicesaqualitativeevaluationofstaffperceptions AT rosmanjosephinexenia recognitionandmanagementofagitationinacutementalhealthservicesaqualitativeevaluationofstaffperceptions AT seamankarla recognitionandmanagementofagitationinacutementalhealthservicesaqualitativeevaluationofstaffperceptions |