Cargando…

Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review

BACKGROUND: Reactive case detection (RACD) and foci investigation are key strategies in malaria elimination and prevention of its re-establishment. They are a key part of surveillance that has been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be considered as a core intervention and as one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perera, Ruwanthi, Caldera, Amandhi, Wickremasinghe, A. Rajitha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03478-0
_version_ 1783607965383655424
author Perera, Ruwanthi
Caldera, Amandhi
Wickremasinghe, A. Rajitha
author_facet Perera, Ruwanthi
Caldera, Amandhi
Wickremasinghe, A. Rajitha
author_sort Perera, Ruwanthi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reactive case detection (RACD) and foci investigation are key strategies in malaria elimination and prevention of its re-establishment. They are a key part of surveillance that has been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be considered as a core intervention and as one of the three pillars of the Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030. METHODS: A search using the key words “Reactive Case Detection”, “RACD”, “RCD” and “Malaria” was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Taylor and Francis online databases for studies published until 31st July 2019. The inclusion criteria for selection of articles for review included (1) how RACD is implemented in each country; (2) challenges faced in RACD implementation; (3) suggestions on how the effectiveness of RACD process can be improved. RESULTS: 411 titles were identified, 41 full text articles were screened and 29 were found eligible for inclusion in the review. Published literature on RACD, and case and foci investigations has mostly assessed the process of the activity. Most studies have documented that the yield of positives in RACD has been highest in the index case’s household and the immediate neighbourhood of the index case. Microscopy and RDTs are the common tests used in RACD. The guidelines for case and foci investigation, and RACD and PACD, are not universally adopted and are country-specific. Some of the limitations and challenges identified include lack of proper guidelines, logistic issues and problems with public compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no documented evidence that RACD is useful in malaria elimination settings, most authors have opined that RACD is necessary for malaria elimination. Lack of knowledge in the target populations, a target radius and how to carry out the RACD process is a major challenge in the decision-making process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7653886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76538862020-11-10 Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review Perera, Ruwanthi Caldera, Amandhi Wickremasinghe, A. Rajitha Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Reactive case detection (RACD) and foci investigation are key strategies in malaria elimination and prevention of its re-establishment. They are a key part of surveillance that has been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be considered as a core intervention and as one of the three pillars of the Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030. METHODS: A search using the key words “Reactive Case Detection”, “RACD”, “RCD” and “Malaria” was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Taylor and Francis online databases for studies published until 31st July 2019. The inclusion criteria for selection of articles for review included (1) how RACD is implemented in each country; (2) challenges faced in RACD implementation; (3) suggestions on how the effectiveness of RACD process can be improved. RESULTS: 411 titles were identified, 41 full text articles were screened and 29 were found eligible for inclusion in the review. Published literature on RACD, and case and foci investigations has mostly assessed the process of the activity. Most studies have documented that the yield of positives in RACD has been highest in the index case’s household and the immediate neighbourhood of the index case. Microscopy and RDTs are the common tests used in RACD. The guidelines for case and foci investigation, and RACD and PACD, are not universally adopted and are country-specific. Some of the limitations and challenges identified include lack of proper guidelines, logistic issues and problems with public compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is no documented evidence that RACD is useful in malaria elimination settings, most authors have opined that RACD is necessary for malaria elimination. Lack of knowledge in the target populations, a target radius and how to carry out the RACD process is a major challenge in the decision-making process. BioMed Central 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7653886/ /pubmed/33172462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03478-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Perera, Ruwanthi
Caldera, Amandhi
Wickremasinghe, A. Rajitha
Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review
title Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review
title_full Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review
title_fullStr Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review
title_full_unstemmed Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review
title_short Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review
title_sort reactive case detection (racd) and foci investigation strategies in malaria control and elimination: a review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03478-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pereraruwanthi reactivecasedetectionracdandfociinvestigationstrategiesinmalariacontrolandeliminationareview
AT calderaamandhi reactivecasedetectionracdandfociinvestigationstrategiesinmalariacontrolandeliminationareview
AT wickremasinghearajitha reactivecasedetectionracdandfociinvestigationstrategiesinmalariacontrolandeliminationareview