Cargando…

How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, the for-profit sector has gained a substantial share of nursing home care within just a few years. The ethical question that arises from the growth of for-profit care is whether the market logic can be reconciled with the provision of healthcare. This question relates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kruse, Florien M., Ligtenberg, Wieke M. R., Oerlemans, Anke J. M., Groenewoud, Stef, Jeurissen, Patrick P. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7
_version_ 1783607998723129344
author Kruse, Florien M.
Ligtenberg, Wieke M. R.
Oerlemans, Anke J. M.
Groenewoud, Stef
Jeurissen, Patrick P. T.
author_facet Kruse, Florien M.
Ligtenberg, Wieke M. R.
Oerlemans, Anke J. M.
Groenewoud, Stef
Jeurissen, Patrick P. T.
author_sort Kruse, Florien M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, the for-profit sector has gained a substantial share of nursing home care within just a few years. The ethical question that arises from the growth of for-profit care is whether the market logic can be reconciled with the provision of healthcare. This question relates to the debate on the Moral Limits of Markets (MLM) and commodification of care. METHODS: The contribution of this study is twofold. Firstly, we construct a theoretical framework from existing literature; this theoretical framework differentiates four logics: the market, bureaucracy, professionalism, and care. Secondly, we follow an empirical ethics approach; we used three for-profit nursing homes as case studies and conducted qualitative interviews with various stakeholders. RESULTS: Four main insights emerge from our empirical study. Firstly, there are many aspects of the care relationship (e.g. care environment, personal relationships, management) and every aspect of the relationship should be considered because the four logics are reconciled differently for each aspect. The environment and conditions of for-profit nursing homes are especially commodified. Secondly, for-profit nursing homes pursue a different professional logic from the traditional, non-profit sector – one which is inspired by the logic of care and which contrasts with bureaucratic logic. However, insofar as professionals in for-profit homes are primarily responsive to residents’ wishes, the market logic also prevails. Thirdly, a multilevel approach is necessary to study the MLM in the care sector since the degree of commodification differs by level. Lastly, it is difficult for the market to engineer social cohesion among the residents of nursing homes. CONCLUSIONS: The for-profit nursing home sector does embrace the logic of the market but reconciles it with other logics (i.e. logic of care and logic of professionalism). Importantly, for-profit nursing homes have created an environment in which care professionals can provide person-oriented care, thereby reconciling the logic of the market with the logic of care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7654039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76540392020-11-10 How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach Kruse, Florien M. Ligtenberg, Wieke M. R. Oerlemans, Anke J. M. Groenewoud, Stef Jeurissen, Patrick P. T. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, the for-profit sector has gained a substantial share of nursing home care within just a few years. The ethical question that arises from the growth of for-profit care is whether the market logic can be reconciled with the provision of healthcare. This question relates to the debate on the Moral Limits of Markets (MLM) and commodification of care. METHODS: The contribution of this study is twofold. Firstly, we construct a theoretical framework from existing literature; this theoretical framework differentiates four logics: the market, bureaucracy, professionalism, and care. Secondly, we follow an empirical ethics approach; we used three for-profit nursing homes as case studies and conducted qualitative interviews with various stakeholders. RESULTS: Four main insights emerge from our empirical study. Firstly, there are many aspects of the care relationship (e.g. care environment, personal relationships, management) and every aspect of the relationship should be considered because the four logics are reconciled differently for each aspect. The environment and conditions of for-profit nursing homes are especially commodified. Secondly, for-profit nursing homes pursue a different professional logic from the traditional, non-profit sector – one which is inspired by the logic of care and which contrasts with bureaucratic logic. However, insofar as professionals in for-profit homes are primarily responsive to residents’ wishes, the market logic also prevails. Thirdly, a multilevel approach is necessary to study the MLM in the care sector since the degree of commodification differs by level. Lastly, it is difficult for the market to engineer social cohesion among the residents of nursing homes. CONCLUSIONS: The for-profit nursing home sector does embrace the logic of the market but reconciles it with other logics (i.e. logic of care and logic of professionalism). Importantly, for-profit nursing homes have created an environment in which care professionals can provide person-oriented care, thereby reconciling the logic of the market with the logic of care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7. BioMed Central 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7654039/ /pubmed/33168083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kruse, Florien M.
Ligtenberg, Wieke M. R.
Oerlemans, Anke J. M.
Groenewoud, Stef
Jeurissen, Patrick P. T.
How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_full How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_fullStr How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_full_unstemmed How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_short How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
title_sort how the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33168083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kruseflorienm howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT ligtenbergwiekemr howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT oerlemansankejm howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT groenewoudstef howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach
AT jeurissenpatrickpt howthelogicsofthemarketbureaucracyprofessionalismandcarearereconciledinpracticeanempiricalethicsapproach