Cargando…
Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact worldwide and has brought clinical assays both for acute diagnosis and prior exposure determination to the forefront. Serological testing intended for point-of-care or laboratory use can be used to determine more accurate individual and population a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33379092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121883 |
_version_ | 1783608046229913600 |
---|---|
author | Ernst, Emilie Wolfe, Patricia Stahura, Corrine Edwards, Katie A. |
author_facet | Ernst, Emilie Wolfe, Patricia Stahura, Corrine Edwards, Katie A. |
author_sort | Ernst, Emilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact worldwide and has brought clinical assays both for acute diagnosis and prior exposure determination to the forefront. Serological testing intended for point-of-care or laboratory use can be used to determine more accurate individual and population assessments of prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2; improve our understanding of the degree to which immunity is conveyed to subsequent exposures; and quantify immune response to future vaccines. In response to this pandemic, initially more than 90 companies deployed serology assays to the U.S. market, many of which made overstated claims for their accuracy, regulatory approval status, and utility for intended purpose. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration subsequently instituted an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) procedure requiring that manufacturers submit validation data, but allowing newly developed serological tests to be marketed without the usual approval process during this crisis. Although this rapid deployment was intended to benefit public health, the incomplete understanding of immune response to the virus and lack of assay vetting resulted in quality issues with some of these tests, and thus many were withdrawn after submission. Common assay platforms include lateral flow assays which can serve an important niche of low cost, rapid turnaround, and increased accessibility whereas established laboratory-based platforms based on ELISAs and chemiluminescence expand existing technologies to SARS-CoV-2 and can provide throughput and quantification capabilities. While most of the currently EUA assays rely on these well-established platforms, despite their apparent technical simplicity, there are numerous practical challenges both for manufacturers in developing and for end-users in running and interpreting such assays. Within are discussed technical challenges to serology development for SARS-CoV-2, with an emphasis on lateral flow assay technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7654332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76543322020-11-12 Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 Ernst, Emilie Wolfe, Patricia Stahura, Corrine Edwards, Katie A. Talanta Review The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact worldwide and has brought clinical assays both for acute diagnosis and prior exposure determination to the forefront. Serological testing intended for point-of-care or laboratory use can be used to determine more accurate individual and population assessments of prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2; improve our understanding of the degree to which immunity is conveyed to subsequent exposures; and quantify immune response to future vaccines. In response to this pandemic, initially more than 90 companies deployed serology assays to the U.S. market, many of which made overstated claims for their accuracy, regulatory approval status, and utility for intended purpose. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration subsequently instituted an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) procedure requiring that manufacturers submit validation data, but allowing newly developed serological tests to be marketed without the usual approval process during this crisis. Although this rapid deployment was intended to benefit public health, the incomplete understanding of immune response to the virus and lack of assay vetting resulted in quality issues with some of these tests, and thus many were withdrawn after submission. Common assay platforms include lateral flow assays which can serve an important niche of low cost, rapid turnaround, and increased accessibility whereas established laboratory-based platforms based on ELISAs and chemiluminescence expand existing technologies to SARS-CoV-2 and can provide throughput and quantification capabilities. While most of the currently EUA assays rely on these well-established platforms, despite their apparent technical simplicity, there are numerous practical challenges both for manufacturers in developing and for end-users in running and interpreting such assays. Within are discussed technical challenges to serology development for SARS-CoV-2, with an emphasis on lateral flow assay technology. Elsevier B.V. 2021-03-01 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7654332/ /pubmed/33379092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121883 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Ernst, Emilie Wolfe, Patricia Stahura, Corrine Edwards, Katie A. Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | technical considerations to development of serological tests for sars-cov-2 |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33379092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ernstemilie technicalconsiderationstodevelopmentofserologicaltestsforsarscov2 AT wolfepatricia technicalconsiderationstodevelopmentofserologicaltestsforsarscov2 AT stahuracorrine technicalconsiderationstodevelopmentofserologicaltestsforsarscov2 AT edwardskatiea technicalconsiderationstodevelopmentofserologicaltestsforsarscov2 |