Cargando…

AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas

AIMS: To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves the refraction prediction performance of existing intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas. METHODS: A dataset of 4806 cataract patients were gathere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Tingyang, Stein, Joshua D., Nallasamy, Nambi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.29.20222539
_version_ 1783608139060346880
author Li, Tingyang
Stein, Joshua D.
Nallasamy, Nambi
author_facet Li, Tingyang
Stein, Joshua D.
Nallasamy, Nambi
author_sort Li, Tingyang
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves the refraction prediction performance of existing intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas. METHODS: A dataset of 4806 cataract patients were gathered at the Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, and split into a training set (80% of patients, 5761 eyes) and a testing set (20% of patients, 961 eyes). A previously developed ML-based method was used to predict the postoperative ACD based on preoperative biometry. This ML-based postoperative ACD was integrated into new effective lens position (ELP) predictions using regression models to rescale the ML output for each of four existing formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay, and SRK/T). The performance of the formulas with ML-modified ELP was compared using a testing dataset. Performance was measured by the mean absolute error (MAE) in refraction prediction. RESULTS: When the ELP was replaced with a linear combination of the original ELP and the ML-predicted ELP, the MAEs ± SD (in Diopters) in the testing set were: 0.356 ± 0.329 for Haigis, 0.352 ± 0.319 for Hoffer Q, 0.371 ± 0.336 for Holladay, and 0.361 ± 0.331 for SRK/T which were significantly lower than those of the original formulas: 0.373 ± 0.328 for Haigis, 0.408 ± 0.337 for Hoffer Q, 0.384 ± 0.341 for Holladay, and 0.394 ± 0.351 for SRK/T. CONCLUSION: Using a more accurately predicted postoperative ACD significantly improves the prediction accuracy of four existing IOL power formulas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7654911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76549112020-11-11 AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas Li, Tingyang Stein, Joshua D. Nallasamy, Nambi medRxiv Article AIMS: To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves the refraction prediction performance of existing intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas. METHODS: A dataset of 4806 cataract patients were gathered at the Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, and split into a training set (80% of patients, 5761 eyes) and a testing set (20% of patients, 961 eyes). A previously developed ML-based method was used to predict the postoperative ACD based on preoperative biometry. This ML-based postoperative ACD was integrated into new effective lens position (ELP) predictions using regression models to rescale the ML output for each of four existing formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay, and SRK/T). The performance of the formulas with ML-modified ELP was compared using a testing dataset. Performance was measured by the mean absolute error (MAE) in refraction prediction. RESULTS: When the ELP was replaced with a linear combination of the original ELP and the ML-predicted ELP, the MAEs ± SD (in Diopters) in the testing set were: 0.356 ± 0.329 for Haigis, 0.352 ± 0.319 for Hoffer Q, 0.371 ± 0.336 for Holladay, and 0.361 ± 0.331 for SRK/T which were significantly lower than those of the original formulas: 0.373 ± 0.328 for Haigis, 0.408 ± 0.337 for Hoffer Q, 0.384 ± 0.341 for Holladay, and 0.394 ± 0.351 for SRK/T. CONCLUSION: Using a more accurately predicted postoperative ACD significantly improves the prediction accuracy of four existing IOL power formulas. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7654911/ /pubmed/33173915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.29.20222539 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Li, Tingyang
Stein, Joshua D.
Nallasamy, Nambi
AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas
title AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas
title_full AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas
title_fullStr AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas
title_full_unstemmed AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas
title_short AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas
title_sort ai-powered effective lens position prediction improves the accuracy of existing lens formulas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.29.20222539
work_keys_str_mv AT litingyang aipoweredeffectivelenspositionpredictionimprovestheaccuracyofexistinglensformulas
AT steinjoshuad aipoweredeffectivelenspositionpredictionimprovestheaccuracyofexistinglensformulas
AT nallasamynambi aipoweredeffectivelenspositionpredictionimprovestheaccuracyofexistinglensformulas