Cargando…
Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies
As economic woes of the COVID-19 pandemic deepen, strategies are being formulated to avoid the need for prolonged stay-at-home orders, while implementing risk-based quarantine, testing, contact tracing and surveillance protocols. Given limited resources and the significant economic, public health, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.20211631 |
_version_ | 1783608140249432064 |
---|---|
author | Wells, Chad R. Townsend, Jeffrey P. Pandey, Abhishek Moghadas, Seyed M. Krieger, Gary Singer, Burton McDonald, Robert H. Fitzpatrick, Meagan C. Galvani, Alison P. |
author_facet | Wells, Chad R. Townsend, Jeffrey P. Pandey, Abhishek Moghadas, Seyed M. Krieger, Gary Singer, Burton McDonald, Robert H. Fitzpatrick, Meagan C. Galvani, Alison P. |
author_sort | Wells, Chad R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | As economic woes of the COVID-19 pandemic deepen, strategies are being formulated to avoid the need for prolonged stay-at-home orders, while implementing risk-based quarantine, testing, contact tracing and surveillance protocols. Given limited resources and the significant economic, public health, and operational challenges of the current 14-day quarantine recommendation, it is vital to understand if shorter but equally effective quarantine and testing strategies can be deployed. To quantify the probability of post-quarantine transmission upon isolation of a positive test, we developed a mathematical model in which we varied quarantine duration and the timing of molecular tests for three scenarios of entry into quarantine. Specifically, we consider travel quarantine, quarantine of traced contacts with an unknown time if infection, and quarantine of cases with a known time of exposure. With a one-day delay between test and result, we found that testing on exit (or entry and exit) can reduce the duration of a 14-day quarantine by 50%, while testing on entry shortened quarantine by at most one day. Testing on exit more effectively reduces post-quarantine transmission than testing upon entry. Furthermore, we identified the optimal testing date within quarantines of varying duration, finding that testing on exit was most effective for quarantines lasting up to seven days. As a real-world validation of these principles, we analyzed the results of 4,040 SARS CoV-2 RT-PCR tests administered to offshore oil rig employees. Among the 47 positives obtained with a testing on entry and exit strategy, 16 cases that previously tested negative at entry were identified, with no further cases detected among employees following quarantine exit. Moreover, this strategy successfully prevented an expected nine offshore transmission events stemming from cases who had tested negative on the entry test, each one a serious concern for initiating rapid spread and a disabling outbreak in the close quarters of an offshore rig. This successful outcome highlights that appropriately timed testing can make shorter quarantines more effective, thereby minimizing economic impacts, disruptions to operational integrity, and COVID-related public health risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7654919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76549192020-11-11 Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies Wells, Chad R. Townsend, Jeffrey P. Pandey, Abhishek Moghadas, Seyed M. Krieger, Gary Singer, Burton McDonald, Robert H. Fitzpatrick, Meagan C. Galvani, Alison P. medRxiv Article As economic woes of the COVID-19 pandemic deepen, strategies are being formulated to avoid the need for prolonged stay-at-home orders, while implementing risk-based quarantine, testing, contact tracing and surveillance protocols. Given limited resources and the significant economic, public health, and operational challenges of the current 14-day quarantine recommendation, it is vital to understand if shorter but equally effective quarantine and testing strategies can be deployed. To quantify the probability of post-quarantine transmission upon isolation of a positive test, we developed a mathematical model in which we varied quarantine duration and the timing of molecular tests for three scenarios of entry into quarantine. Specifically, we consider travel quarantine, quarantine of traced contacts with an unknown time if infection, and quarantine of cases with a known time of exposure. With a one-day delay between test and result, we found that testing on exit (or entry and exit) can reduce the duration of a 14-day quarantine by 50%, while testing on entry shortened quarantine by at most one day. Testing on exit more effectively reduces post-quarantine transmission than testing upon entry. Furthermore, we identified the optimal testing date within quarantines of varying duration, finding that testing on exit was most effective for quarantines lasting up to seven days. As a real-world validation of these principles, we analyzed the results of 4,040 SARS CoV-2 RT-PCR tests administered to offshore oil rig employees. Among the 47 positives obtained with a testing on entry and exit strategy, 16 cases that previously tested negative at entry were identified, with no further cases detected among employees following quarantine exit. Moreover, this strategy successfully prevented an expected nine offshore transmission events stemming from cases who had tested negative on the entry test, each one a serious concern for initiating rapid spread and a disabling outbreak in the close quarters of an offshore rig. This successful outcome highlights that appropriately timed testing can make shorter quarantines more effective, thereby minimizing economic impacts, disruptions to operational integrity, and COVID-related public health risks. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7654919/ /pubmed/33173923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.20211631 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Wells, Chad R. Townsend, Jeffrey P. Pandey, Abhishek Moghadas, Seyed M. Krieger, Gary Singer, Burton McDonald, Robert H. Fitzpatrick, Meagan C. Galvani, Alison P. Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies |
title | Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies |
title_full | Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies |
title_fullStr | Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies |
title_short | Optimal COVID-19 quarantine and testing strategies |
title_sort | optimal covid-19 quarantine and testing strategies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7654919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.20211631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wellschadr optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT townsendjeffreyp optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT pandeyabhishek optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT moghadasseyedm optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT kriegergary optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT singerburton optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT mcdonaldroberth optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT fitzpatrickmeaganc optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies AT galvanialisonp optimalcovid19quarantineandtestingstrategies |