Cargando…

MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum

PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monk, Bradley J., Grisham, Rachel N., Banerjee, Susana, Kalbacher, Elsa, Mirza, Mansoor Raza, Romero, Ignacio, Vuylsteke, Peter, Coleman, Robert L., Hilpert, Felix, Oza, Amit M., Westermann, Anneke, Oehler, Martin K., Pignata, Sandro, Aghajanian, Carol, Colombo, Nicoletta, Drill, Esther, Cibula, David, Moore, Kathleen N., Christy-Bittel, Janna, del Campo, Josep M., Berger, Regina, Marth, Christian, Sehouli, Jalid, O’Malley, David M., Churruca, Cristina, Boyd, Adam P., Kristensen, Gunnar, Clamp, Andrew, Ray-Coquard, Isabelle, Vergote, Ignace
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01164
_version_ 1783608152045912064
author Monk, Bradley J.
Grisham, Rachel N.
Banerjee, Susana
Kalbacher, Elsa
Mirza, Mansoor Raza
Romero, Ignacio
Vuylsteke, Peter
Coleman, Robert L.
Hilpert, Felix
Oza, Amit M.
Westermann, Anneke
Oehler, Martin K.
Pignata, Sandro
Aghajanian, Carol
Colombo, Nicoletta
Drill, Esther
Cibula, David
Moore, Kathleen N.
Christy-Bittel, Janna
del Campo, Josep M.
Berger, Regina
Marth, Christian
Sehouli, Jalid
O’Malley, David M.
Churruca, Cristina
Boyd, Adam P.
Kristensen, Gunnar
Clamp, Andrew
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Vergote, Ignace
author_facet Monk, Bradley J.
Grisham, Rachel N.
Banerjee, Susana
Kalbacher, Elsa
Mirza, Mansoor Raza
Romero, Ignacio
Vuylsteke, Peter
Coleman, Robert L.
Hilpert, Felix
Oza, Amit M.
Westermann, Anneke
Oehler, Martin K.
Pignata, Sandro
Aghajanian, Carol
Colombo, Nicoletta
Drill, Esther
Cibula, David
Moore, Kathleen N.
Christy-Bittel, Janna
del Campo, Josep M.
Berger, Regina
Marth, Christian
Sehouli, Jalid
O’Malley, David M.
Churruca, Cristina
Boyd, Adam P.
Kristensen, Gunnar
Clamp, Andrew
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Vergote, Ignace
author_sort Monk, Bradley J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC. METHODS: This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between KRAS mutation and response to binimetinib. Results from an updated analysis (n = 341; January 2019) were consistent. CONCLUSION: Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and KRAS mutation might predict response to binimetinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7655017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76550172020-11-12 MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum Monk, Bradley J. Grisham, Rachel N. Banerjee, Susana Kalbacher, Elsa Mirza, Mansoor Raza Romero, Ignacio Vuylsteke, Peter Coleman, Robert L. Hilpert, Felix Oza, Amit M. Westermann, Anneke Oehler, Martin K. Pignata, Sandro Aghajanian, Carol Colombo, Nicoletta Drill, Esther Cibula, David Moore, Kathleen N. Christy-Bittel, Janna del Campo, Josep M. Berger, Regina Marth, Christian Sehouli, Jalid O’Malley, David M. Churruca, Cristina Boyd, Adam P. Kristensen, Gunnar Clamp, Andrew Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Vergote, Ignace J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC. METHODS: This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between KRAS mutation and response to binimetinib. Results from an updated analysis (n = 341; January 2019) were consistent. CONCLUSION: Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and KRAS mutation might predict response to binimetinib. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020-11-10 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7655017/ /pubmed/32822286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01164 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Monk, Bradley J.
Grisham, Rachel N.
Banerjee, Susana
Kalbacher, Elsa
Mirza, Mansoor Raza
Romero, Ignacio
Vuylsteke, Peter
Coleman, Robert L.
Hilpert, Felix
Oza, Amit M.
Westermann, Anneke
Oehler, Martin K.
Pignata, Sandro
Aghajanian, Carol
Colombo, Nicoletta
Drill, Esther
Cibula, David
Moore, Kathleen N.
Christy-Bittel, Janna
del Campo, Josep M.
Berger, Regina
Marth, Christian
Sehouli, Jalid
O’Malley, David M.
Churruca, Cristina
Boyd, Adam P.
Kristensen, Gunnar
Clamp, Andrew
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Vergote, Ignace
MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum
title MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum
title_full MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum
title_fullStr MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum
title_full_unstemmed MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum
title_short MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum
title_sort milo/engot-ov11: binimetinib versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent or persistent low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01164
work_keys_str_mv AT monkbradleyj miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT grishamracheln miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT banerjeesusana miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT kalbacherelsa miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT mirzamansoorraza miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT romeroignacio miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT vuylstekepeter miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT colemanrobertl miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT hilpertfelix miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT ozaamitm miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT westermannanneke miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT oehlermartink miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT pignatasandro miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT aghajaniancarol miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT colombonicoletta miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT drillesther miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT cibuladavid miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT moorekathleenn miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT christybitteljanna miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT delcampojosepm miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT bergerregina miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT marthchristian miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT sehoulijalid miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT omalleydavidm miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT churrucacristina miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT boydadamp miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT kristensengunnar miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT clampandrew miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT raycoquardisabelle miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum
AT vergoteignace miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum