Cargando…
MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum
PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01164 |
_version_ | 1783608152045912064 |
---|---|
author | Monk, Bradley J. Grisham, Rachel N. Banerjee, Susana Kalbacher, Elsa Mirza, Mansoor Raza Romero, Ignacio Vuylsteke, Peter Coleman, Robert L. Hilpert, Felix Oza, Amit M. Westermann, Anneke Oehler, Martin K. Pignata, Sandro Aghajanian, Carol Colombo, Nicoletta Drill, Esther Cibula, David Moore, Kathleen N. Christy-Bittel, Janna del Campo, Josep M. Berger, Regina Marth, Christian Sehouli, Jalid O’Malley, David M. Churruca, Cristina Boyd, Adam P. Kristensen, Gunnar Clamp, Andrew Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Vergote, Ignace |
author_facet | Monk, Bradley J. Grisham, Rachel N. Banerjee, Susana Kalbacher, Elsa Mirza, Mansoor Raza Romero, Ignacio Vuylsteke, Peter Coleman, Robert L. Hilpert, Felix Oza, Amit M. Westermann, Anneke Oehler, Martin K. Pignata, Sandro Aghajanian, Carol Colombo, Nicoletta Drill, Esther Cibula, David Moore, Kathleen N. Christy-Bittel, Janna del Campo, Josep M. Berger, Regina Marth, Christian Sehouli, Jalid O’Malley, David M. Churruca, Cristina Boyd, Adam P. Kristensen, Gunnar Clamp, Andrew Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Vergote, Ignace |
author_sort | Monk, Bradley J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC. METHODS: This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between KRAS mutation and response to binimetinib. Results from an updated analysis (n = 341; January 2019) were consistent. CONCLUSION: Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and KRAS mutation might predict response to binimetinib. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7655017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76550172020-11-12 MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum Monk, Bradley J. Grisham, Rachel N. Banerjee, Susana Kalbacher, Elsa Mirza, Mansoor Raza Romero, Ignacio Vuylsteke, Peter Coleman, Robert L. Hilpert, Felix Oza, Amit M. Westermann, Anneke Oehler, Martin K. Pignata, Sandro Aghajanian, Carol Colombo, Nicoletta Drill, Esther Cibula, David Moore, Kathleen N. Christy-Bittel, Janna del Campo, Josep M. Berger, Regina Marth, Christian Sehouli, Jalid O’Malley, David M. Churruca, Cristina Boyd, Adam P. Kristensen, Gunnar Clamp, Andrew Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Vergote, Ignace J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC. METHODS: This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between KRAS mutation and response to binimetinib. Results from an updated analysis (n = 341; January 2019) were consistent. CONCLUSION: Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and KRAS mutation might predict response to binimetinib. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020-11-10 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7655017/ /pubmed/32822286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01164 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Monk, Bradley J. Grisham, Rachel N. Banerjee, Susana Kalbacher, Elsa Mirza, Mansoor Raza Romero, Ignacio Vuylsteke, Peter Coleman, Robert L. Hilpert, Felix Oza, Amit M. Westermann, Anneke Oehler, Martin K. Pignata, Sandro Aghajanian, Carol Colombo, Nicoletta Drill, Esther Cibula, David Moore, Kathleen N. Christy-Bittel, Janna del Campo, Josep M. Berger, Regina Marth, Christian Sehouli, Jalid O’Malley, David M. Churruca, Cristina Boyd, Adam P. Kristensen, Gunnar Clamp, Andrew Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Vergote, Ignace MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum |
title | MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum |
title_full | MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum |
title_fullStr | MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum |
title_full_unstemmed | MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum |
title_short | MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum |
title_sort | milo/engot-ov11: binimetinib versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent or persistent low-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneum |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monkbradleyj miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT grishamracheln miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT banerjeesusana miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT kalbacherelsa miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT mirzamansoorraza miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT romeroignacio miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT vuylstekepeter miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT colemanrobertl miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT hilpertfelix miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT ozaamitm miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT westermannanneke miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT oehlermartink miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT pignatasandro miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT aghajaniancarol miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT colombonicoletta miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT drillesther miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT cibuladavid miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT moorekathleenn miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT christybitteljanna miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT delcampojosepm miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT bergerregina miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT marthchristian miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT sehoulijalid miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT omalleydavidm miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT churrucacristina miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT boydadamp miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT kristensengunnar miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT clampandrew miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT raycoquardisabelle miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum AT vergoteignace miloengotov11binimetinibversusphysicianschoicechemotherapyinrecurrentorpersistentlowgradeserouscarcinomasoftheovaryfallopiantubeorprimaryperitoneum |