Cargando…

Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy

Radiotherapy (RT) aims to deliver a spatially conformal dose of radiation to tumours while maximizing the dose sparing to healthy tissues. However, the internal patient anatomy is constantly moving due to respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and urinary activity. The long term goal of the RT commu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertholet, Jenny, Knopf, Antje, Eiben, Björn, McClelland, Jamie, Grimwood, Alexander, Harris, Emma, Menten, Martin, Poulsen, Per, Nguyen, Doan Trang, Keall, Paul, Oelfke, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOP Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ba8
_version_ 1783608174899625984
author Bertholet, Jenny
Knopf, Antje
Eiben, Björn
McClelland, Jamie
Grimwood, Alexander
Harris, Emma
Menten, Martin
Poulsen, Per
Nguyen, Doan Trang
Keall, Paul
Oelfke, Uwe
author_facet Bertholet, Jenny
Knopf, Antje
Eiben, Björn
McClelland, Jamie
Grimwood, Alexander
Harris, Emma
Menten, Martin
Poulsen, Per
Nguyen, Doan Trang
Keall, Paul
Oelfke, Uwe
author_sort Bertholet, Jenny
collection PubMed
description Radiotherapy (RT) aims to deliver a spatially conformal dose of radiation to tumours while maximizing the dose sparing to healthy tissues. However, the internal patient anatomy is constantly moving due to respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and urinary activity. The long term goal of the RT community to ‘see what we treat, as we treat’ and to act on this information instantaneously has resulted in rapid technological innovation. Specialized treatment machines, such as robotic or gimbal-steered linear accelerators (linac) with in-room imaging suites, have been developed specifically for real-time treatment adaptation. Additional equipment, such as stereoscopic kilovoltage (kV) imaging, ultrasound transducers and electromagnetic transponders, has been developed for intrafraction motion monitoring on conventional linacs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been integrated with cobalt treatment units and more recently with linacs. In addition to hardware innovation, software development has played a substantial role in the development of motion monitoring methods based on respiratory motion surrogates and planar kV or Megavoltage (MV) imaging that is available on standard equipped linacs. In this paper, we review and compare the different intrafraction motion monitoring methods proposed in the literature and demonstrated in real-time on clinical data as well as their possible future developments. We then discuss general considerations on validation and quality assurance for clinical implementation. Besides photon RT, particle therapy is increasingly used to treat moving targets. However, transferring motion monitoring technologies from linacs to particle beam lines presents substantial challenges. Lessons learned from the implementation of real-time intrafraction monitoring for photon RT will be used as a basis to discuss the implementation of these methods for particle RT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7655120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76551202020-11-12 Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy Bertholet, Jenny Knopf, Antje Eiben, Björn McClelland, Jamie Grimwood, Alexander Harris, Emma Menten, Martin Poulsen, Per Nguyen, Doan Trang Keall, Paul Oelfke, Uwe Phys Med Biol Topical Review Radiotherapy (RT) aims to deliver a spatially conformal dose of radiation to tumours while maximizing the dose sparing to healthy tissues. However, the internal patient anatomy is constantly moving due to respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and urinary activity. The long term goal of the RT community to ‘see what we treat, as we treat’ and to act on this information instantaneously has resulted in rapid technological innovation. Specialized treatment machines, such as robotic or gimbal-steered linear accelerators (linac) with in-room imaging suites, have been developed specifically for real-time treatment adaptation. Additional equipment, such as stereoscopic kilovoltage (kV) imaging, ultrasound transducers and electromagnetic transponders, has been developed for intrafraction motion monitoring on conventional linacs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been integrated with cobalt treatment units and more recently with linacs. In addition to hardware innovation, software development has played a substantial role in the development of motion monitoring methods based on respiratory motion surrogates and planar kV or Megavoltage (MV) imaging that is available on standard equipped linacs. In this paper, we review and compare the different intrafraction motion monitoring methods proposed in the literature and demonstrated in real-time on clinical data as well as their possible future developments. We then discuss general considerations on validation and quality assurance for clinical implementation. Besides photon RT, particle therapy is increasingly used to treat moving targets. However, transferring motion monitoring technologies from linacs to particle beam lines presents substantial challenges. Lessons learned from the implementation of real-time intrafraction monitoring for photon RT will be used as a basis to discuss the implementation of these methods for particle RT. IOP Publishing 2019-08 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7655120/ /pubmed/31226704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ba8 Text en © 2019 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
spellingShingle Topical Review
Bertholet, Jenny
Knopf, Antje
Eiben, Björn
McClelland, Jamie
Grimwood, Alexander
Harris, Emma
Menten, Martin
Poulsen, Per
Nguyen, Doan Trang
Keall, Paul
Oelfke, Uwe
Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy
title Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy
title_full Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy
title_fullStr Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy
title_short Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy
title_sort real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy
topic Topical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ba8
work_keys_str_mv AT bertholetjenny realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT knopfantje realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT eibenbjorn realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT mcclellandjamie realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT grimwoodalexander realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT harrisemma realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT mentenmartin realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT poulsenper realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT nguyendoantrang realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT keallpaul realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT oelfkeuwe realtimeintrafractionmotionmonitoringinexternalbeamradiotherapy