Cargando…

Objective It was the objective of this study to describe and compare antimicrobial resistance in clinical and non-clinical E. coli from different cattle populations. Material and methods For this, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antimicrobials against clinical and non-clinical E. coli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois, Käsbohrer, Annemarie, Grobbel, Mirjam, Hammerl, Jens, Kaspar, Heike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32823326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1197-5701
_version_ 1783608207405481984
author Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois
Käsbohrer, Annemarie
Grobbel, Mirjam
Hammerl, Jens
Kaspar, Heike
author_facet Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois
Käsbohrer, Annemarie
Grobbel, Mirjam
Hammerl, Jens
Kaspar, Heike
author_sort Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois
collection PubMed
description Objective It was the objective of this study to describe and compare antimicrobial resistance in clinical and non-clinical E. coli from different cattle populations. Material and methods For this, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antimicrobials against clinical and non-clinical E. coli isolates from dairy cows, beef cattle, veal calves and other calves were analyzed. The MIC examinations were performed in the framework of a monitoring program for clinical isolates from animals in Germany (GE RM -Vet) and as part of the national zoonosis monitoring between 2009 and 2019 using broth microdilution. The MIC were evaluated based on the epidemiological cut off values provided by the European Centre for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Results A total of 5127 isolates was included in the analysis. The highest resistance rates were observed in isolates from calves with diarrhea, followed by non-clinical isolates from cattle slaughtered at an age under 1 year. The lowest resistance rates were encountered in E. coli from bulk tank milk of dairy herds and from beef cattle. Resistance rates of isolates from cases of mastitis were higher than of non-clinical isolates from bulk tank milk, but lower than the rates observed in calves. Conclusion and clinical relevance Resistance rates to the critically important antimicrobials fluoroquinolones and 3rd generation cephalosporins were high in isolates from mastitis samples and in isolates from calves with diarrhea. This may be linked to the high use of these substances in dairy cows and the feeding of wastemilk from treated cows to calves, exposing the latter to drug residues and resistant bacteria from the milk. The use of these substances has to be reduced to a minimum in order to avoid further spread of this kind of resistance in the cattle population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7655263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76552632020-11-12 Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois Käsbohrer, Annemarie Grobbel, Mirjam Hammerl, Jens Kaspar, Heike Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere Objective It was the objective of this study to describe and compare antimicrobial resistance in clinical and non-clinical E. coli from different cattle populations. Material and methods For this, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antimicrobials against clinical and non-clinical E. coli isolates from dairy cows, beef cattle, veal calves and other calves were analyzed. The MIC examinations were performed in the framework of a monitoring program for clinical isolates from animals in Germany (GE RM -Vet) and as part of the national zoonosis monitoring between 2009 and 2019 using broth microdilution. The MIC were evaluated based on the epidemiological cut off values provided by the European Centre for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Results A total of 5127 isolates was included in the analysis. The highest resistance rates were observed in isolates from calves with diarrhea, followed by non-clinical isolates from cattle slaughtered at an age under 1 year. The lowest resistance rates were encountered in E. coli from bulk tank milk of dairy herds and from beef cattle. Resistance rates of isolates from cases of mastitis were higher than of non-clinical isolates from bulk tank milk, but lower than the rates observed in calves. Conclusion and clinical relevance Resistance rates to the critically important antimicrobials fluoroquinolones and 3rd generation cephalosporins were high in isolates from mastitis samples and in isolates from calves with diarrhea. This may be linked to the high use of these substances in dairy cows and the feeding of wastemilk from treated cows to calves, exposing the latter to drug residues and resistant bacteria from the milk. The use of these substances has to be reduced to a minimum in order to avoid further spread of this kind of resistance in the cattle population. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-08 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7655263/ /pubmed/32823326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1197-5701 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois
Käsbohrer, Annemarie
Grobbel, Mirjam
Hammerl, Jens
Kaspar, Heike
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32823326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1197-5701