Cargando…

Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL

BACKGROUND: The ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) (EPI) test is a non-invasive risk assessment tool for detection of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPC) that informs whether to proceed with prostate biopsy. We sought to assess the impact of EPI on the decision to biopsy in a real-world clinical setting. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tutrone, Ronald, Donovan, Michael J., Torkler, Phillipp, Tadigotla, Vasisht, McLain, Tom, Noerholm, Mikkel, Skog, Johan, McKiernan, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32382078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-020-0237-z
_version_ 1783608217209667584
author Tutrone, Ronald
Donovan, Michael J.
Torkler, Phillipp
Tadigotla, Vasisht
McLain, Tom
Noerholm, Mikkel
Skog, Johan
McKiernan, James
author_facet Tutrone, Ronald
Donovan, Michael J.
Torkler, Phillipp
Tadigotla, Vasisht
McLain, Tom
Noerholm, Mikkel
Skog, Johan
McKiernan, James
author_sort Tutrone, Ronald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) (EPI) test is a non-invasive risk assessment tool for detection of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPC) that informs whether to proceed with prostate biopsy. We sought to assess the impact of EPI on the decision to biopsy in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, two-armed clinical utility study that enrolled 1094 patients with 72 urologists from 24 urology practices. Patients were considered for prostate biopsy at enrollment based on standard clinical criteria. All patients had an EPI test; however, patients were randomized into EPI vs. control arms where only the EPI arm received results for their biopsy decision. RESULTS: In the EPI arm (N = 458), 93 patients received negative EPI scores of which 63% were recommended to defer biopsy by the urologist and 74% ultimately deferred. In contrast, 87% of patients with positive EPI scores were recommended to undergo biopsy with a 72% compliance rate to the urologist’s recommendation. This led to detection of 30% more HGPC compared to the control arm, and we estimate that 49% fewer HGPC were missed due to deferrals compared to standard of care (SOC). Overall, 68% of urologists reported that the EPI test influenced their biopsy decision. The primary reason not to comply with EPI results was rising PSA. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the first report on a PC biomarker utility study with a blinded control arm. The study demonstrates that the EPI test influences the overall decision to defer or proceed with a biopsy and improves patient stratification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7655505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76555052020-11-17 Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL Tutrone, Ronald Donovan, Michael J. Torkler, Phillipp Tadigotla, Vasisht McLain, Tom Noerholm, Mikkel Skog, Johan McKiernan, James Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: The ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) (EPI) test is a non-invasive risk assessment tool for detection of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPC) that informs whether to proceed with prostate biopsy. We sought to assess the impact of EPI on the decision to biopsy in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, two-armed clinical utility study that enrolled 1094 patients with 72 urologists from 24 urology practices. Patients were considered for prostate biopsy at enrollment based on standard clinical criteria. All patients had an EPI test; however, patients were randomized into EPI vs. control arms where only the EPI arm received results for their biopsy decision. RESULTS: In the EPI arm (N = 458), 93 patients received negative EPI scores of which 63% were recommended to defer biopsy by the urologist and 74% ultimately deferred. In contrast, 87% of patients with positive EPI scores were recommended to undergo biopsy with a 72% compliance rate to the urologist’s recommendation. This led to detection of 30% more HGPC compared to the control arm, and we estimate that 49% fewer HGPC were missed due to deferrals compared to standard of care (SOC). Overall, 68% of urologists reported that the EPI test influenced their biopsy decision. The primary reason not to comply with EPI results was rising PSA. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the first report on a PC biomarker utility study with a blinded control arm. The study demonstrates that the EPI test influences the overall decision to defer or proceed with a biopsy and improves patient stratification. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7655505/ /pubmed/32382078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-020-0237-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tutrone, Ronald
Donovan, Michael J.
Torkler, Phillipp
Tadigotla, Vasisht
McLain, Tom
Noerholm, Mikkel
Skog, Johan
McKiernan, James
Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL
title Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL
title_full Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL
title_fullStr Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL
title_short Clinical utility of the exosome based ExoDx Prostate(IntelliScore) EPI test in men presenting for initial Biopsy with a PSA 2–10 ng/mL
title_sort clinical utility of the exosome based exodx prostate(intelliscore) epi test in men presenting for initial biopsy with a psa 2–10 ng/ml
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32382078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-020-0237-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tutroneronald clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml
AT donovanmichaelj clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml
AT torklerphillipp clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml
AT tadigotlavasisht clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml
AT mclaintom clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml
AT noerholmmikkel clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml
AT skogjohan clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml
AT mckiernanjames clinicalutilityoftheexosomebasedexodxprostateintelliscoreepitestinmenpresentingforinitialbiopsywithapsa210ngml