Cargando…

Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming

Low-input (LI) dairy farming, relying heavily on grazing, is increasing in popularity for perceived sustainability, welfare, and milk nutritional quality benefits. However, there is little research into the breed suitability for these systems. The popular Holstein–Friesians are not well-suited to LI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Hannah, Stergiadis, Sokratis, Chatzidimitriou, Eleni, Sanderson, Roy, Leifert, Carlo, Butler, Gillian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.544149
_version_ 1783608229943574528
author Davis, Hannah
Stergiadis, Sokratis
Chatzidimitriou, Eleni
Sanderson, Roy
Leifert, Carlo
Butler, Gillian
author_facet Davis, Hannah
Stergiadis, Sokratis
Chatzidimitriou, Eleni
Sanderson, Roy
Leifert, Carlo
Butler, Gillian
author_sort Davis, Hannah
collection PubMed
description Low-input (LI) dairy farming, relying heavily on grazing, is increasing in popularity for perceived sustainability, welfare, and milk nutritional quality benefits. However, there is little research into the breed suitability for these systems. The popular Holstein–Friesians are not well-suited to LI production as, to achieve their potential high yields, they require high levels of concentrate intakes and veterinary inputs. Holstein–Friesians were traditionally bred for high milk yields, which often correlate negatively with functional traits, such as fertility and health. This drives the need for alternative breed choices, and UK dairy farmers use several crossbreeding practices. Additionally, classic measures of production efficiency (kilogram feed per liter of milk) are not the sole priority in LI systems, which also aim for improved health, fertility, forage conversion, and milk quality. This study aimed to explore the effect of breeding strategy on LI and organic production in dairy systems, collecting data from 17 farms throughout England and Wales: 7 organic and 10 low-input conventional systems with both purebred and crossbred cows from different breeds. Records from 1,070 cows were collected, including background data, health, fertility, breeding, and parity. Additionally, milk was analyzed on four occasions (autumn 2011 and winter, spring, and summer 2012). Principal components analysis was used to visualize the effect of management, Farm ID, and stage of lactation on LI production. The analysis clustered cows by Farm ID, showing that individual management practice on each farm had the greatest impact on various production traits. Cows were allocated a composite score based on their yield, health records, and milk fatty acid profile, and a linear mixed-effects model indicated (p < 0.01) that crossbred New Zealand Friesian cows scored highest, whereas Dairy Shorthorn cows scored the lowest. This paper highlights weaknesses in current breeding programs for LI and organic farms in the UK, in terms of the alignment of breeds with husbandry practices. Additional research is needed to explore any gene by environment interactions to meet the true potential of individual cows and certain breeds under LI and organic management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7655643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76556432020-11-13 Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming Davis, Hannah Stergiadis, Sokratis Chatzidimitriou, Eleni Sanderson, Roy Leifert, Carlo Butler, Gillian Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Low-input (LI) dairy farming, relying heavily on grazing, is increasing in popularity for perceived sustainability, welfare, and milk nutritional quality benefits. However, there is little research into the breed suitability for these systems. The popular Holstein–Friesians are not well-suited to LI production as, to achieve their potential high yields, they require high levels of concentrate intakes and veterinary inputs. Holstein–Friesians were traditionally bred for high milk yields, which often correlate negatively with functional traits, such as fertility and health. This drives the need for alternative breed choices, and UK dairy farmers use several crossbreeding practices. Additionally, classic measures of production efficiency (kilogram feed per liter of milk) are not the sole priority in LI systems, which also aim for improved health, fertility, forage conversion, and milk quality. This study aimed to explore the effect of breeding strategy on LI and organic production in dairy systems, collecting data from 17 farms throughout England and Wales: 7 organic and 10 low-input conventional systems with both purebred and crossbred cows from different breeds. Records from 1,070 cows were collected, including background data, health, fertility, breeding, and parity. Additionally, milk was analyzed on four occasions (autumn 2011 and winter, spring, and summer 2012). Principal components analysis was used to visualize the effect of management, Farm ID, and stage of lactation on LI production. The analysis clustered cows by Farm ID, showing that individual management practice on each farm had the greatest impact on various production traits. Cows were allocated a composite score based on their yield, health records, and milk fatty acid profile, and a linear mixed-effects model indicated (p < 0.01) that crossbred New Zealand Friesian cows scored highest, whereas Dairy Shorthorn cows scored the lowest. This paper highlights weaknesses in current breeding programs for LI and organic farms in the UK, in terms of the alignment of breeds with husbandry practices. Additional research is needed to explore any gene by environment interactions to meet the true potential of individual cows and certain breeds under LI and organic management. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7655643/ /pubmed/33195517 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.544149 Text en Copyright © 2020 Davis, Stergiadis, Chatzidimitriou, Sanderson, Leifert and Butler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Davis, Hannah
Stergiadis, Sokratis
Chatzidimitriou, Eleni
Sanderson, Roy
Leifert, Carlo
Butler, Gillian
Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming
title Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming
title_full Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming
title_fullStr Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming
title_full_unstemmed Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming
title_short Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming
title_sort meeting breeding potential in organic and low-input dairy farming
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195517
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.544149
work_keys_str_mv AT davishannah meetingbreedingpotentialinorganicandlowinputdairyfarming
AT stergiadissokratis meetingbreedingpotentialinorganicandlowinputdairyfarming
AT chatzidimitrioueleni meetingbreedingpotentialinorganicandlowinputdairyfarming
AT sandersonroy meetingbreedingpotentialinorganicandlowinputdairyfarming
AT leifertcarlo meetingbreedingpotentialinorganicandlowinputdairyfarming
AT butlergillian meetingbreedingpotentialinorganicandlowinputdairyfarming