Cargando…
Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: There has been growing international interest in performing remote consultations in primary care, particularly amidst the current COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, the evidence surrounding the safety of remote consultations is inconclusive. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23482 |
_version_ | 1783608233602056192 |
---|---|
author | Han, Seung Min Greenfield, Geva Majeed, Azeem Hayhoe, Benedict |
author_facet | Han, Seung Min Greenfield, Geva Majeed, Azeem Hayhoe, Benedict |
author_sort | Han, Seung Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There has been growing international interest in performing remote consultations in primary care, particularly amidst the current COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, the evidence surrounding the safety of remote consultations is inconclusive. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in remote consultations is an important aspect of patient safety that needs to be addressed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to summarize evidence on the impact of remote consultation in primary care with regard to antibiotic prescribing. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for literature published since the databases’ inception to February 2020. Peer-reviewed studies conducted in primary health care settings were included. All remote consultation types were considered, and studies were required to report any quantitative measure of antibiotic prescribing to be included in this systematic review. Studies were excluded if there were no comparison groups (face-to-face consultations). RESULTS: In total, 12 studies were identified. Of these, 4 studies reported higher antibiotic-prescribing rates, 5 studies reported lower antibiotic-prescribing rates, and 3 studies reported similar antibiotic-prescribing rates in remote consultations compared with face-to-face consultations. Guideline-concordant prescribing was not significantly different between remote and face-to-face consultations for patients with sinusitis, but conflicting results were found for patients with acute respiratory infections. Mixed evidence was found for follow-up visit rates after remote and face-to-face consultations. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to confidently conclude that remote consulting has a significant impact on antibiotic prescribing in primary care. However, studies indicating higher prescribing rates in remote consultations than in face-to-face consultations are a concern. Further, well-conducted studies are needed to inform safe and appropriate implementation of remote consulting to ensure that there is no unintended impact on antimicrobial resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7655728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76557282020-11-13 Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review Han, Seung Min Greenfield, Geva Majeed, Azeem Hayhoe, Benedict J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: There has been growing international interest in performing remote consultations in primary care, particularly amidst the current COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this, the evidence surrounding the safety of remote consultations is inconclusive. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in remote consultations is an important aspect of patient safety that needs to be addressed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to summarize evidence on the impact of remote consultation in primary care with regard to antibiotic prescribing. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for literature published since the databases’ inception to February 2020. Peer-reviewed studies conducted in primary health care settings were included. All remote consultation types were considered, and studies were required to report any quantitative measure of antibiotic prescribing to be included in this systematic review. Studies were excluded if there were no comparison groups (face-to-face consultations). RESULTS: In total, 12 studies were identified. Of these, 4 studies reported higher antibiotic-prescribing rates, 5 studies reported lower antibiotic-prescribing rates, and 3 studies reported similar antibiotic-prescribing rates in remote consultations compared with face-to-face consultations. Guideline-concordant prescribing was not significantly different between remote and face-to-face consultations for patients with sinusitis, but conflicting results were found for patients with acute respiratory infections. Mixed evidence was found for follow-up visit rates after remote and face-to-face consultations. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to confidently conclude that remote consulting has a significant impact on antibiotic prescribing in primary care. However, studies indicating higher prescribing rates in remote consultations than in face-to-face consultations are a concern. Further, well-conducted studies are needed to inform safe and appropriate implementation of remote consulting to ensure that there is no unintended impact on antimicrobial resistance. JMIR Publications 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7655728/ /pubmed/33031045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23482 Text en ©Seung Min Han, Geva Greenfield, Azeem Majeed, Benedict Hayhoe. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 09.11.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Han, Seung Min Greenfield, Geva Majeed, Azeem Hayhoe, Benedict Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review |
title | Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_full | Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_short | Impact of Remote Consultations on Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Health Care: Systematic Review |
title_sort | impact of remote consultations on antibiotic prescribing in primary health care: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanseungmin impactofremoteconsultationsonantibioticprescribinginprimaryhealthcaresystematicreview AT greenfieldgeva impactofremoteconsultationsonantibioticprescribinginprimaryhealthcaresystematicreview AT majeedazeem impactofremoteconsultationsonantibioticprescribinginprimaryhealthcaresystematicreview AT hayhoebenedict impactofremoteconsultationsonantibioticprescribinginprimaryhealthcaresystematicreview |