Cargando…
Why NIPT should be publicly funded
Asking pregnant women to (co)pay for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) out of pocket leads to unequal access across socioeconomic strata. To avoid these social justice issues, first-trimester prenatal screening should be publicly funded in countries such as the Netherlands, with universal coverag...
Autores principales: | Bunnik, Eline Maria, Kater-Kuipers, Adriana, Galjaard, Robert-Jan H, de Beaufort, Inez |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32277019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106218 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Rethinking counselling in prenatal screening: An ethical analysis of informed consent in the context of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
por: Kater‐Kuipers, Adriana, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
por: Bunnik, Eline M, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands: An interview study exploring opinions about and experiences with societal pressure, reimbursement, and an expanding scope
por: Bakkeren, Iris M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals
por: Kater-Kuipers, A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
por: Blackshaw, Bruce Philip, et al.
Publicado: (2021)