Cargando…
Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care
INTRODUCTION: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership demonstrated international differences in ovarian cancer survival, particularly for women aged 65–74 with advanced disease. These findings suggest differences in treatment could be contributing to survival disparities. OBJECTIVE: To com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001403 |
_version_ | 1783608322228748288 |
---|---|
author | Norell, Charles H Butler, John Farrell, Rhonda Altman, Alon Bentley, James Cabasag, Citadel J Cohen, Paul A Fegan, Scott Fung-Kee-Fung, Michael Gourley, Charlie Hacker, Neville F Hanna, Louise Høgdall, Claus Kim Kristensen, Gunnar Kwon, Janice McNally, Orla Nelson, Gregg Nordin, Andy O'Donnell, Dearbhaile Schnack, Tine Sykes, Peter H Zotow, Ewa Harrison, Samantha |
author_facet | Norell, Charles H Butler, John Farrell, Rhonda Altman, Alon Bentley, James Cabasag, Citadel J Cohen, Paul A Fegan, Scott Fung-Kee-Fung, Michael Gourley, Charlie Hacker, Neville F Hanna, Louise Høgdall, Claus Kim Kristensen, Gunnar Kwon, Janice McNally, Orla Nelson, Gregg Nordin, Andy O'Donnell, Dearbhaile Schnack, Tine Sykes, Peter H Zotow, Ewa Harrison, Samantha |
author_sort | Norell, Charles H |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership demonstrated international differences in ovarian cancer survival, particularly for women aged 65–74 with advanced disease. These findings suggest differences in treatment could be contributing to survival disparities. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care across seven high-income countries. METHODS: A comparison of guidelines was performed and validated by a clinical working group. To explore clinical practice, a patterns of care survey was developed. A questionnaire regarding management and potential health system-related barriers to providing treatment was emailed to gynecological specialists. Guideline and survey results were crudely compared with 3-year survival by ‘distant’ stage using Spearman’s rho. RESULTS: Twenty-seven guidelines were compared, and 119 clinicians completed the survey. Guideline-related measures varied between countries but did not correlate with survival internationally. Guidelines were consistent for surgical recommendations of either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Reported patterns of surgical care varied internationally, including for rates of primary versus interval debulking, extensive/‘ultra-radical’ surgery, and perceived barriers to optimal cytoreduction. Comparison showed that willingness to undertake extensive surgery correlated with survival across countries (r(s)=0.94, p=0.017). For systemic/radiation therapies, guideline differences were more pronounced, particularly for bevacizumab and PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitors. Reported health system-related barriers also varied internationally and included a lack of adequate hospital staffing and treatment monitoring via local and national audits. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest international variations in ovarian cancer treatment. Characteristics relating to countries with higher stage-specific survival included higher reported rates of primary surgery; willingness to undertake extensive/ultra-radical procedures; greater access to high-cost drugs; and auditing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7656152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76561522020-11-17 Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care Norell, Charles H Butler, John Farrell, Rhonda Altman, Alon Bentley, James Cabasag, Citadel J Cohen, Paul A Fegan, Scott Fung-Kee-Fung, Michael Gourley, Charlie Hacker, Neville F Hanna, Louise Høgdall, Claus Kim Kristensen, Gunnar Kwon, Janice McNally, Orla Nelson, Gregg Nordin, Andy O'Donnell, Dearbhaile Schnack, Tine Sykes, Peter H Zotow, Ewa Harrison, Samantha Int J Gynecol Cancer Original Research INTRODUCTION: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership demonstrated international differences in ovarian cancer survival, particularly for women aged 65–74 with advanced disease. These findings suggest differences in treatment could be contributing to survival disparities. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care across seven high-income countries. METHODS: A comparison of guidelines was performed and validated by a clinical working group. To explore clinical practice, a patterns of care survey was developed. A questionnaire regarding management and potential health system-related barriers to providing treatment was emailed to gynecological specialists. Guideline and survey results were crudely compared with 3-year survival by ‘distant’ stage using Spearman’s rho. RESULTS: Twenty-seven guidelines were compared, and 119 clinicians completed the survey. Guideline-related measures varied between countries but did not correlate with survival internationally. Guidelines were consistent for surgical recommendations of either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Reported patterns of surgical care varied internationally, including for rates of primary versus interval debulking, extensive/‘ultra-radical’ surgery, and perceived barriers to optimal cytoreduction. Comparison showed that willingness to undertake extensive surgery correlated with survival across countries (r(s)=0.94, p=0.017). For systemic/radiation therapies, guideline differences were more pronounced, particularly for bevacizumab and PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitors. Reported health system-related barriers also varied internationally and included a lack of adequate hospital staffing and treatment monitoring via local and national audits. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest international variations in ovarian cancer treatment. Characteristics relating to countries with higher stage-specific survival included higher reported rates of primary surgery; willingness to undertake extensive/ultra-radical procedures; greater access to high-cost drugs; and auditing. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7656152/ /pubmed/32784203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001403 Text en © IGCS and ESGO 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Norell, Charles H Butler, John Farrell, Rhonda Altman, Alon Bentley, James Cabasag, Citadel J Cohen, Paul A Fegan, Scott Fung-Kee-Fung, Michael Gourley, Charlie Hacker, Neville F Hanna, Louise Høgdall, Claus Kim Kristensen, Gunnar Kwon, Janice McNally, Orla Nelson, Gregg Nordin, Andy O'Donnell, Dearbhaile Schnack, Tine Sykes, Peter H Zotow, Ewa Harrison, Samantha Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care |
title | Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care |
title_full | Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care |
title_fullStr | Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care |
title_short | Exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care |
title_sort | exploring international differences in ovarian cancer treatment: a comparison of clinical practice guidelines and patterns of care |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT norellcharlesh exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT butlerjohn exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT farrellrhonda exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT altmanalon exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT bentleyjames exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT cabasagcitadelj exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT cohenpaula exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT feganscott exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT fungkeefungmichael exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT gourleycharlie exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT hackernevillef exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT hannalouise exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT høgdallclauskim exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT kristensengunnar exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT kwonjanice exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT mcnallyorla exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT nelsongregg exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT nordinandy exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT odonnelldearbhaile exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT schnacktine exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT sykespeterh exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT zotowewa exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare AT harrisonsamantha exploringinternationaldifferencesinovariancancertreatmentacomparisonofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandpatternsofcare |