Cargando…

Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) is still a challenge due to stent-associated problems. We explored endoscopic gastric fenestration (EGF) as an innovative alternative intervention. AIM: To assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of EGF for WON. METHODS: Between March...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Fang, Wu, Liang, Wang, Xiang-Dong, Xiao, Jian-Guo, Li, Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i41.6431
_version_ 1783608334755037184
author Liu, Fang
Wu, Liang
Wang, Xiang-Dong
Xiao, Jian-Guo
Li, Wen
author_facet Liu, Fang
Wu, Liang
Wang, Xiang-Dong
Xiao, Jian-Guo
Li, Wen
author_sort Liu, Fang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) is still a challenge due to stent-associated problems. We explored endoscopic gastric fenestration (EGF) as an innovative alternative intervention. AIM: To assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of EGF for WON. METHODS: Between March 2019 and March 2020, five patients with symptomatic WON in close contact with the stomach wall were treated by EGF. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used to select appropriate sites for gastric fenestration, which then proceeded layer by layer as in endoscopic submucosal dissection. Both the stomach muscularis propria and pseudocyst capsule were penetrated. Fenestrations were expanded up to 1.5-3 cm for drainage or subsequent necrosectomy. RESULTS: EGF failed in Case 1 due to nonadherence of WON to the gastric wall. EGF was successfully implemented in the other four cases by further refinement of fenestration site selection according to computed tomography, endoscopy and EUS features. The average procedure time for EGF was 124 min (EUS assessment, 32.3 min; initial fenestration, 28.8 min; expanded fenestration, 33 min), and tended to decrease as experience gradually increased. The diameter of the fenestration site was 1.5-3 cm, beyond the caliber of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), to ensure effective drainage or subsequent necrosectomy. Fenestration sites showed surprising capacity for postoperative self-healing within 1-3 wk. No EGF-related complications were seen. WON disappeared within 3 wk after EGF. In Case 3, another separate WON, treated by endoscopic LAMS drainage, recurred within 4 d after LAMS removal due to stent-related hemorrhage, and resolved slowly over almost 3 mo. No recurrences were observed in the five patients. CONCLUSION: EGF is an innovative and promising alternative intervention for WON adherent to the gastric wall. The challenge resides in the gauging of actual adherence and in selecting appropriate fenestration sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76562092020-11-25 Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study Liu, Fang Wu, Liang Wang, Xiang-Dong Xiao, Jian-Guo Li, Wen World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) is still a challenge due to stent-associated problems. We explored endoscopic gastric fenestration (EGF) as an innovative alternative intervention. AIM: To assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of EGF for WON. METHODS: Between March 2019 and March 2020, five patients with symptomatic WON in close contact with the stomach wall were treated by EGF. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used to select appropriate sites for gastric fenestration, which then proceeded layer by layer as in endoscopic submucosal dissection. Both the stomach muscularis propria and pseudocyst capsule were penetrated. Fenestrations were expanded up to 1.5-3 cm for drainage or subsequent necrosectomy. RESULTS: EGF failed in Case 1 due to nonadherence of WON to the gastric wall. EGF was successfully implemented in the other four cases by further refinement of fenestration site selection according to computed tomography, endoscopy and EUS features. The average procedure time for EGF was 124 min (EUS assessment, 32.3 min; initial fenestration, 28.8 min; expanded fenestration, 33 min), and tended to decrease as experience gradually increased. The diameter of the fenestration site was 1.5-3 cm, beyond the caliber of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), to ensure effective drainage or subsequent necrosectomy. Fenestration sites showed surprising capacity for postoperative self-healing within 1-3 wk. No EGF-related complications were seen. WON disappeared within 3 wk after EGF. In Case 3, another separate WON, treated by endoscopic LAMS drainage, recurred within 4 d after LAMS removal due to stent-related hemorrhage, and resolved slowly over almost 3 mo. No recurrences were observed in the five patients. CONCLUSION: EGF is an innovative and promising alternative intervention for WON adherent to the gastric wall. The challenge resides in the gauging of actual adherence and in selecting appropriate fenestration sites. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-11-07 2020-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7656209/ /pubmed/33244203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i41.6431 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Liu, Fang
Wu, Liang
Wang, Xiang-Dong
Xiao, Jian-Guo
Li, Wen
Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study
title Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study
title_full Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study
title_fullStr Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study
title_short Endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: A pilot study
title_sort endoscopic gastric fenestration of debriding pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a pilot study
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i41.6431
work_keys_str_mv AT liufang endoscopicgastricfenestrationofdebridingpancreaticwalledoffnecrosisapilotstudy
AT wuliang endoscopicgastricfenestrationofdebridingpancreaticwalledoffnecrosisapilotstudy
AT wangxiangdong endoscopicgastricfenestrationofdebridingpancreaticwalledoffnecrosisapilotstudy
AT xiaojianguo endoscopicgastricfenestrationofdebridingpancreaticwalledoffnecrosisapilotstudy
AT liwen endoscopicgastricfenestrationofdebridingpancreaticwalledoffnecrosisapilotstudy