Cargando…
Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between pregravid use of a variety of contraceptive methods and subsequent fecundability. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Denmark and North America, 2007-19. PARTICIPANTS: 17 954 women who had tried to conceive for up to six menstrual cycles at study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3966 |
_version_ | 1783608357082365952 |
---|---|
author | Yland, Jennifer J Bresnick, Kathryn A Hatch, Elizabeth E Wesselink, Amelia K Mikkelsen, Ellen M Rothman, Kenneth J Sørensen, Henrik T Huybrechts, Krista F Wise, Lauren A |
author_facet | Yland, Jennifer J Bresnick, Kathryn A Hatch, Elizabeth E Wesselink, Amelia K Mikkelsen, Ellen M Rothman, Kenneth J Sørensen, Henrik T Huybrechts, Krista F Wise, Lauren A |
author_sort | Yland, Jennifer J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between pregravid use of a variety of contraceptive methods and subsequent fecundability. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Denmark and North America, 2007-19. PARTICIPANTS: 17 954 women who had tried to conceive for up to six menstrual cycles at study entry. At baseline, participants reported their contraceptive histories, and personal, medical, and lifestyle characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy, determined by bimonthly follow-up questionnaires for up to 12 months. RESULTS: Approximately 38% (n=6735) of participants had recently used oral contraceptives, 13% (n=2398) had used long acting reversible contraceptive methods, and 31% (n=5497) had used barrier methods. Women who had recently stopped using oral contraceptives, the contraceptive ring, and some long acting reversible contraceptive methods experienced short term delays in return of fertility compared with users of barrier methods. Use of injectable contraceptives was associated with decreased fecundability compared with use of barrier methods (fecundability ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.89). Users of injectable contraceptives had the longest delay in return of normal fertility (five to eight menstrual cycles), followed by users of patch contraceptives (four cycles), users of oral and ring contraceptives (three cycles), and users of hormonal and copper intrauterine devices and implant contraceptives (two cycles). Lifetime length of use of hormonal contraceptive methods was not associated with fecundability. CONCLUSIONS: Use of some hormonal contraceptive methods was associated with delays in return of fertility, with injectable contraceptives showing the longest delay. The findings indicated little or no lasting effect of long term use of these methods on fecundability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7656314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76563142020-11-17 Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study Yland, Jennifer J Bresnick, Kathryn A Hatch, Elizabeth E Wesselink, Amelia K Mikkelsen, Ellen M Rothman, Kenneth J Sørensen, Henrik T Huybrechts, Krista F Wise, Lauren A BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between pregravid use of a variety of contraceptive methods and subsequent fecundability. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Denmark and North America, 2007-19. PARTICIPANTS: 17 954 women who had tried to conceive for up to six menstrual cycles at study entry. At baseline, participants reported their contraceptive histories, and personal, medical, and lifestyle characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy, determined by bimonthly follow-up questionnaires for up to 12 months. RESULTS: Approximately 38% (n=6735) of participants had recently used oral contraceptives, 13% (n=2398) had used long acting reversible contraceptive methods, and 31% (n=5497) had used barrier methods. Women who had recently stopped using oral contraceptives, the contraceptive ring, and some long acting reversible contraceptive methods experienced short term delays in return of fertility compared with users of barrier methods. Use of injectable contraceptives was associated with decreased fecundability compared with use of barrier methods (fecundability ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.89). Users of injectable contraceptives had the longest delay in return of normal fertility (five to eight menstrual cycles), followed by users of patch contraceptives (four cycles), users of oral and ring contraceptives (three cycles), and users of hormonal and copper intrauterine devices and implant contraceptives (two cycles). Lifetime length of use of hormonal contraceptive methods was not associated with fecundability. CONCLUSIONS: Use of some hormonal contraceptive methods was associated with delays in return of fertility, with injectable contraceptives showing the longest delay. The findings indicated little or no lasting effect of long term use of these methods on fecundability. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7656314/ /pubmed/33177047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3966 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Yland, Jennifer J Bresnick, Kathryn A Hatch, Elizabeth E Wesselink, Amelia K Mikkelsen, Ellen M Rothman, Kenneth J Sørensen, Henrik T Huybrechts, Krista F Wise, Lauren A Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study |
title | Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study |
title_full | Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study |
title_short | Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study |
title_sort | pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ylandjenniferj pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT bresnickkathryna pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT hatchelizabethe pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT wesselinkameliak pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT mikkelsenellenm pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT rothmankennethj pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT sørensenhenrikt pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT huybrechtskristaf pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy AT wiselaurena pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy |