Cargando…

Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between pregravid use of a variety of contraceptive methods and subsequent fecundability. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Denmark and North America, 2007-19. PARTICIPANTS: 17 954 women who had tried to conceive for up to six menstrual cycles at study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yland, Jennifer J, Bresnick, Kathryn A, Hatch, Elizabeth E, Wesselink, Amelia K, Mikkelsen, Ellen M, Rothman, Kenneth J, Sørensen, Henrik T, Huybrechts, Krista F, Wise, Lauren A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3966
_version_ 1783608357082365952
author Yland, Jennifer J
Bresnick, Kathryn A
Hatch, Elizabeth E
Wesselink, Amelia K
Mikkelsen, Ellen M
Rothman, Kenneth J
Sørensen, Henrik T
Huybrechts, Krista F
Wise, Lauren A
author_facet Yland, Jennifer J
Bresnick, Kathryn A
Hatch, Elizabeth E
Wesselink, Amelia K
Mikkelsen, Ellen M
Rothman, Kenneth J
Sørensen, Henrik T
Huybrechts, Krista F
Wise, Lauren A
author_sort Yland, Jennifer J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between pregravid use of a variety of contraceptive methods and subsequent fecundability. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Denmark and North America, 2007-19. PARTICIPANTS: 17 954 women who had tried to conceive for up to six menstrual cycles at study entry. At baseline, participants reported their contraceptive histories, and personal, medical, and lifestyle characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy, determined by bimonthly follow-up questionnaires for up to 12 months. RESULTS: Approximately 38% (n=6735) of participants had recently used oral contraceptives, 13% (n=2398) had used long acting reversible contraceptive methods, and 31% (n=5497) had used barrier methods. Women who had recently stopped using oral contraceptives, the contraceptive ring, and some long acting reversible contraceptive methods experienced short term delays in return of fertility compared with users of barrier methods. Use of injectable contraceptives was associated with decreased fecundability compared with use of barrier methods (fecundability ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.89). Users of injectable contraceptives had the longest delay in return of normal fertility (five to eight menstrual cycles), followed by users of patch contraceptives (four cycles), users of oral and ring contraceptives (three cycles), and users of hormonal and copper intrauterine devices and implant contraceptives (two cycles). Lifetime length of use of hormonal contraceptive methods was not associated with fecundability. CONCLUSIONS: Use of some hormonal contraceptive methods was associated with delays in return of fertility, with injectable contraceptives showing the longest delay. The findings indicated little or no lasting effect of long term use of these methods on fecundability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76563142020-11-17 Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study Yland, Jennifer J Bresnick, Kathryn A Hatch, Elizabeth E Wesselink, Amelia K Mikkelsen, Ellen M Rothman, Kenneth J Sørensen, Henrik T Huybrechts, Krista F Wise, Lauren A BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between pregravid use of a variety of contraceptive methods and subsequent fecundability. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Denmark and North America, 2007-19. PARTICIPANTS: 17 954 women who had tried to conceive for up to six menstrual cycles at study entry. At baseline, participants reported their contraceptive histories, and personal, medical, and lifestyle characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy, determined by bimonthly follow-up questionnaires for up to 12 months. RESULTS: Approximately 38% (n=6735) of participants had recently used oral contraceptives, 13% (n=2398) had used long acting reversible contraceptive methods, and 31% (n=5497) had used barrier methods. Women who had recently stopped using oral contraceptives, the contraceptive ring, and some long acting reversible contraceptive methods experienced short term delays in return of fertility compared with users of barrier methods. Use of injectable contraceptives was associated with decreased fecundability compared with use of barrier methods (fecundability ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.89). Users of injectable contraceptives had the longest delay in return of normal fertility (five to eight menstrual cycles), followed by users of patch contraceptives (four cycles), users of oral and ring contraceptives (three cycles), and users of hormonal and copper intrauterine devices and implant contraceptives (two cycles). Lifetime length of use of hormonal contraceptive methods was not associated with fecundability. CONCLUSIONS: Use of some hormonal contraceptive methods was associated with delays in return of fertility, with injectable contraceptives showing the longest delay. The findings indicated little or no lasting effect of long term use of these methods on fecundability. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7656314/ /pubmed/33177047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3966 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Yland, Jennifer J
Bresnick, Kathryn A
Hatch, Elizabeth E
Wesselink, Amelia K
Mikkelsen, Ellen M
Rothman, Kenneth J
Sørensen, Henrik T
Huybrechts, Krista F
Wise, Lauren A
Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
title Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
title_full Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
title_short Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
title_sort pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33177047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3966
work_keys_str_mv AT ylandjenniferj pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT bresnickkathryna pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT hatchelizabethe pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT wesselinkameliak pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT mikkelsenellenm pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT rothmankennethj pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT sørensenhenrikt pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT huybrechtskristaf pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy
AT wiselaurena pregravidcontraceptiveuseandfecundabilityprospectivecohortstudy