Cargando…

A new lung donor score to predict short and long-term survival in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Donor selection criteria are crucial for a successful lung transplant outcome. Our objective was to develop a new donor score to predict short- and long-term survival and validate it with five existing lung donor scores (Oto, Eurotransplant, Minnesota, Maryland-UNOS, Louisville-UNOS). ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehrsam, Jonas P., Held, Ulrike, Opitz, Isabelle, Inci, Ilhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209382
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2043
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Donor selection criteria are crucial for a successful lung transplant outcome. Our objective was to develop a new donor score to predict short- and long-term survival and validate it with five existing lung donor scores (Oto, Eurotransplant, Minnesota, Maryland-UNOS, Louisville-UNOS). METHODS: All 454 adult lung transplants at our center between 1992–2015 were included to develop a new score. Discriminative ability for all scores was calculated by the area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (time-dependent AUC) at 30-day, 1, 5 and 10-year survival, and their fit compared with Akaike’s information criterion. For the new score, five pre-selected donor risk factors were derived: age, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, pulmonary infection, PaO(2)/FiO(2)-ratio, weighed via simplification of a multiple Cox model, and shrinkage used to avoid overfitting. The score sub-weighting resulted in a total of 17 points. RESULTS: The existing scores showed predictive accuracy better than chance in prediction of survival of 5-year (AUC 0.58–0.60) to 10-year survival (AUC 0.58–0.64). Our new score had better discriminative ability as the existing scores with regard to 1, 5 and 10-year survival (AUC 0.59, 0.64, 0.66, respectively). Additional adjustment for recipient and surgical procedure variables improved the time-dependent AUC’s slightly. For the secondary outcomes primary graft dysfunction and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, the new score showed also a good predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed Zurich Donor Score is simple, well adapted for the current urge of extended donors use, and shows higher discriminative ability compared to preexisting donor scores regarding short- to long-term survival.