Cargando…
Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection?
BACKGROUND: The surgical strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AADA) usually consists of reconstruction of the tear-lesion in the affected part of the ascending aorta. The optimal strategy either to replace the ascending aorta (AAR) or to replace the ascending aorta and the total aortic arch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209385 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-871 |
_version_ | 1783608362179493888 |
---|---|
author | Salem, Mohamed Friedrich, Christine Rusch, Rene Frank, Derk Hoffmann, Grischa Lutter, Georg Berndt, Rouven Cremer, Jochen Haneya, Assad Puehler, Thomas |
author_facet | Salem, Mohamed Friedrich, Christine Rusch, Rene Frank, Derk Hoffmann, Grischa Lutter, Georg Berndt, Rouven Cremer, Jochen Haneya, Assad Puehler, Thomas |
author_sort | Salem, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The surgical strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AADA) usually consists of reconstruction of the tear-lesion in the affected part of the ascending aorta. The optimal strategy either to replace the ascending aorta (AAR) or to replace the ascending aorta and the total aortic arch (TAAR) is still under debate. Our study compares the 30-day mortality between AAR and TAAR in AADA surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analysed a total patient cohort of 339 patients who underwent surgery for AADA from January 2001 until December 2016. A propensity score-matched analysis between the AAR- and the TAAR-group with 43 patients for each subgroup was subsequently carried out. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk-factors for the 30-d-mortality. The 30-day mortality was defined as the primary end-point and long-term survival was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: In 292 (86.1%) patients AAR and in 47 (13.9%) patients TAAR was performed for emergent AADA. Patients were older (P=0.049) in the AAR group. The median log Euro-SCORE was 25.5% (12.7; 41.7) for AAR and 19.7% (11.7; 32.2) for the TAAR patient cohort (P=0.12). Operative time, cardiopulmonary bypass- (CPB), cross-clamp- and ischemic time were significantly longer in the TAAR group (P<0.001). The overall 30-day mortality-rate was 17.7% (n=60) but was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.27). Forty-nine (16.8%) patients died in the AAR and 11 patients (23.4%) in the TAAR group. After propensity-score matching, no difference in mortality was seen between the subgroups as well (P=0.44). Multivariable analysis identified the Euro-SCORE, long operation-time, postoperative dialysis and arrhythmia and administration of red blood cell concentrates as risk factors for 30-day mortality, but not for TAAR versus AAR. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic goal in AADA surgery should be the complete restoration of the aorta to avoid further long-term complications and re-operations. Though 30-day mortality and postoperative co-morbidity for AAR are comparable to those in TAAR after treatment of AADA in our analysis, decision-making for the surgical strategy should weigh the operative risk of TAAR against the long-term outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7656345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76563452020-11-17 Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection? Salem, Mohamed Friedrich, Christine Rusch, Rene Frank, Derk Hoffmann, Grischa Lutter, Georg Berndt, Rouven Cremer, Jochen Haneya, Assad Puehler, Thomas J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: The surgical strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AADA) usually consists of reconstruction of the tear-lesion in the affected part of the ascending aorta. The optimal strategy either to replace the ascending aorta (AAR) or to replace the ascending aorta and the total aortic arch (TAAR) is still under debate. Our study compares the 30-day mortality between AAR and TAAR in AADA surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analysed a total patient cohort of 339 patients who underwent surgery for AADA from January 2001 until December 2016. A propensity score-matched analysis between the AAR- and the TAAR-group with 43 patients for each subgroup was subsequently carried out. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk-factors for the 30-d-mortality. The 30-day mortality was defined as the primary end-point and long-term survival was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: In 292 (86.1%) patients AAR and in 47 (13.9%) patients TAAR was performed for emergent AADA. Patients were older (P=0.049) in the AAR group. The median log Euro-SCORE was 25.5% (12.7; 41.7) for AAR and 19.7% (11.7; 32.2) for the TAAR patient cohort (P=0.12). Operative time, cardiopulmonary bypass- (CPB), cross-clamp- and ischemic time were significantly longer in the TAAR group (P<0.001). The overall 30-day mortality-rate was 17.7% (n=60) but was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.27). Forty-nine (16.8%) patients died in the AAR and 11 patients (23.4%) in the TAAR group. After propensity-score matching, no difference in mortality was seen between the subgroups as well (P=0.44). Multivariable analysis identified the Euro-SCORE, long operation-time, postoperative dialysis and arrhythmia and administration of red blood cell concentrates as risk factors for 30-day mortality, but not for TAAR versus AAR. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic goal in AADA surgery should be the complete restoration of the aorta to avoid further long-term complications and re-operations. Though 30-day mortality and postoperative co-morbidity for AAR are comparable to those in TAAR after treatment of AADA in our analysis, decision-making for the surgical strategy should weigh the operative risk of TAAR against the long-term outcome. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7656345/ /pubmed/33209385 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-871 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Salem, Mohamed Friedrich, Christine Rusch, Rene Frank, Derk Hoffmann, Grischa Lutter, Georg Berndt, Rouven Cremer, Jochen Haneya, Assad Puehler, Thomas Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection? |
title | Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection? |
title_full | Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection? |
title_fullStr | Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection? |
title_short | Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection? |
title_sort | is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type a dissection? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209385 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salemmohamed istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT friedrichchristine istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT ruschrene istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT frankderk istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT hoffmanngrischa istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT luttergeorg istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT berndtrouven istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT cremerjochen istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT haneyaassad istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection AT puehlerthomas istotalarchreplacementassociatedwithanincreasedriskafteracutetypeadissection |