Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
BACKGROUND: Operative safety and oncologic adequacy of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy remain controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate evidence comparing thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209400 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1855 |
_version_ | 1783608363575148544 |
---|---|
author | Zhong, Yifan Wang, Yang Hu, Xuefei Wang, Gege She, Yunlang Deng, Jiajun Zhang, Lei Peng, Qiao Zhu, Yuming Jiang, Gening Yang, Minglei Xie, Dong Chen, Chang |
author_facet | Zhong, Yifan Wang, Yang Hu, Xuefei Wang, Gege She, Yunlang Deng, Jiajun Zhang, Lei Peng, Qiao Zhu, Yuming Jiang, Gening Yang, Minglei Xie, Dong Chen, Chang |
author_sort | Zhong, Yifan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Operative safety and oncologic adequacy of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy remain controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate evidence comparing thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Electronic searches of PubMed and Web of Science databases were undertaken from inception to March 2020. Comparative studies about thoracoscopic and thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy, with evaluation for perioperative outcomes and oncological results were identified. The following outcomes were measured in this meta-analysis: operating time, blood loss, numbers of lymph node, postoperative hospital stay, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate, mortality, overall survival (OS). The standardized difference (SMD), relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using Stata software. RESULTS: Six studies generating 281 thoracoscopy and 369 thoracotomy cases were finally included. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate and mortality between two groups. However, thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy was associated with longer operation time (SMD 0.59, 95% CI: 0.14 to 1.03, P=0.010). And shorter postoperative hospital stays (SMD −0.24, 95% CI: −0.51 to 0.03, P=0.078) were observed in the thoracoscopy group with marginal significance. Furthermore, sleeve lobectomy via thoracoscopy could achieve comparable OS compared to that via thoracotomy (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.00; P<0.001). In addition, there were no evident publication bias in all observational outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy is a safe and efficient surgical procedure for centrally located NSCLC, with comparable perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncological results compared to thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7656351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76563512020-11-17 A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy Zhong, Yifan Wang, Yang Hu, Xuefei Wang, Gege She, Yunlang Deng, Jiajun Zhang, Lei Peng, Qiao Zhu, Yuming Jiang, Gening Yang, Minglei Xie, Dong Chen, Chang J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Operative safety and oncologic adequacy of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy remain controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate evidence comparing thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Electronic searches of PubMed and Web of Science databases were undertaken from inception to March 2020. Comparative studies about thoracoscopic and thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy, with evaluation for perioperative outcomes and oncological results were identified. The following outcomes were measured in this meta-analysis: operating time, blood loss, numbers of lymph node, postoperative hospital stay, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate, mortality, overall survival (OS). The standardized difference (SMD), relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using Stata software. RESULTS: Six studies generating 281 thoracoscopy and 369 thoracotomy cases were finally included. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate and mortality between two groups. However, thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy was associated with longer operation time (SMD 0.59, 95% CI: 0.14 to 1.03, P=0.010). And shorter postoperative hospital stays (SMD −0.24, 95% CI: −0.51 to 0.03, P=0.078) were observed in the thoracoscopy group with marginal significance. Furthermore, sleeve lobectomy via thoracoscopy could achieve comparable OS compared to that via thoracotomy (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.00; P<0.001). In addition, there were no evident publication bias in all observational outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy is a safe and efficient surgical procedure for centrally located NSCLC, with comparable perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncological results compared to thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7656351/ /pubmed/33209400 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1855 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhong, Yifan Wang, Yang Hu, Xuefei Wang, Gege She, Yunlang Deng, Jiajun Zhang, Lei Peng, Qiao Zhu, Yuming Jiang, Gening Yang, Minglei Xie, Dong Chen, Chang A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209400 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongyifan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT wangyang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT huxuefei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT wanggege asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT sheyunlang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT dengjiajun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT zhanglei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT pengqiao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT zhuyuming asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT jianggening asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT yangminglei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT xiedong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT chenchang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT zhongyifan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT wangyang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT huxuefei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT wanggege systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT sheyunlang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT dengjiajun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT zhanglei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT pengqiao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT zhuyuming systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT jianggening systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT yangminglei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT xiedong systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy AT chenchang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy |