Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy

BACKGROUND: Operative safety and oncologic adequacy of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy remain controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate evidence comparing thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Yifan, Wang, Yang, Hu, Xuefei, Wang, Gege, She, Yunlang, Deng, Jiajun, Zhang, Lei, Peng, Qiao, Zhu, Yuming, Jiang, Gening, Yang, Minglei, Xie, Dong, Chen, Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209400
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1855
_version_ 1783608363575148544
author Zhong, Yifan
Wang, Yang
Hu, Xuefei
Wang, Gege
She, Yunlang
Deng, Jiajun
Zhang, Lei
Peng, Qiao
Zhu, Yuming
Jiang, Gening
Yang, Minglei
Xie, Dong
Chen, Chang
author_facet Zhong, Yifan
Wang, Yang
Hu, Xuefei
Wang, Gege
She, Yunlang
Deng, Jiajun
Zhang, Lei
Peng, Qiao
Zhu, Yuming
Jiang, Gening
Yang, Minglei
Xie, Dong
Chen, Chang
author_sort Zhong, Yifan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Operative safety and oncologic adequacy of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy remain controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate evidence comparing thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Electronic searches of PubMed and Web of Science databases were undertaken from inception to March 2020. Comparative studies about thoracoscopic and thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy, with evaluation for perioperative outcomes and oncological results were identified. The following outcomes were measured in this meta-analysis: operating time, blood loss, numbers of lymph node, postoperative hospital stay, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate, mortality, overall survival (OS). The standardized difference (SMD), relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using Stata software. RESULTS: Six studies generating 281 thoracoscopy and 369 thoracotomy cases were finally included. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate and mortality between two groups. However, thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy was associated with longer operation time (SMD 0.59, 95% CI: 0.14 to 1.03, P=0.010). And shorter postoperative hospital stays (SMD −0.24, 95% CI: −0.51 to 0.03, P=0.078) were observed in the thoracoscopy group with marginal significance. Furthermore, sleeve lobectomy via thoracoscopy could achieve comparable OS compared to that via thoracotomy (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.00; P<0.001). In addition, there were no evident publication bias in all observational outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy is a safe and efficient surgical procedure for centrally located NSCLC, with comparable perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncological results compared to thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76563512020-11-17 A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy Zhong, Yifan Wang, Yang Hu, Xuefei Wang, Gege She, Yunlang Deng, Jiajun Zhang, Lei Peng, Qiao Zhu, Yuming Jiang, Gening Yang, Minglei Xie, Dong Chen, Chang J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Operative safety and oncologic adequacy of thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy remain controversial. As such, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate evidence comparing thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Electronic searches of PubMed and Web of Science databases were undertaken from inception to March 2020. Comparative studies about thoracoscopic and thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy, with evaluation for perioperative outcomes and oncological results were identified. The following outcomes were measured in this meta-analysis: operating time, blood loss, numbers of lymph node, postoperative hospital stay, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate, mortality, overall survival (OS). The standardized difference (SMD), relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using Stata software. RESULTS: Six studies generating 281 thoracoscopy and 369 thoracotomy cases were finally included. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, chest drainage time, postoperative complication rate and mortality between two groups. However, thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy was associated with longer operation time (SMD 0.59, 95% CI: 0.14 to 1.03, P=0.010). And shorter postoperative hospital stays (SMD −0.24, 95% CI: −0.51 to 0.03, P=0.078) were observed in the thoracoscopy group with marginal significance. Furthermore, sleeve lobectomy via thoracoscopy could achieve comparable OS compared to that via thoracotomy (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.00; P<0.001). In addition, there were no evident publication bias in all observational outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy is a safe and efficient surgical procedure for centrally located NSCLC, with comparable perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncological results compared to thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7656351/ /pubmed/33209400 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1855 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhong, Yifan
Wang, Yang
Hu, Xuefei
Wang, Gege
She, Yunlang
Deng, Jiajun
Zhang, Lei
Peng, Qiao
Zhu, Yuming
Jiang, Gening
Yang, Minglei
Xie, Dong
Chen, Chang
A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209400
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1855
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongyifan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT wangyang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT huxuefei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT wanggege asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT sheyunlang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT dengjiajun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT zhanglei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT pengqiao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT zhuyuming asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT jianggening asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT yangminglei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT xiedong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT chenchang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT zhongyifan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT wangyang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT huxuefei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT wanggege systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT sheyunlang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT dengjiajun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT zhanglei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT pengqiao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT zhuyuming systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT jianggening systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT yangminglei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT xiedong systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy
AT chenchang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthoracoscopicversusthoracotomysleevelobectomy