Cargando…

Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports addres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seastedt, Kenneth P., Luca, Michael J., Antevil, Jared L., Browning, Robert F., Mullenix, Philip S., Reoma, Junewai L., McKay, Sean A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209424
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1841
_version_ 1783608374948003840
author Seastedt, Kenneth P.
Luca, Michael J.
Antevil, Jared L.
Browning, Robert F.
Mullenix, Philip S.
Reoma, Junewai L.
McKay, Sean A.
author_facet Seastedt, Kenneth P.
Luca, Michael J.
Antevil, Jared L.
Browning, Robert F.
Mullenix, Philip S.
Reoma, Junewai L.
McKay, Sean A.
author_sort Seastedt, Kenneth P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports address non-adherence to screening, and our study sought to understand the non-compliant patients in our military population. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients enrolled in our screening program from 2013–2019 identified patients who failed to obtain a subsequent Low Dose CT scan (LDCT) within 15 months of their prior scan. Attempts were made to contact these patients and elucidate motivations for non-adherence via telephone. RESULTS: Of the 242 patients enrolled, 183 (76%) patients were adherent to the protocol. Significant predictors of non-adherence versus adherence were younger age (P=0.008), female sex (P=0.005), and enlisted officer rank (P=0.03). There was no difference with regards to race, smoking status, pack-years, negative screens, lung-RADS level, or nodule size. 31 (52%) non-adherent patients were contacted, and 24 (77%) reported their reason for non-adherence was lack of follow-up for a LDCT. Twenty (64%) were interested in re-enrollment. Of the total screening cohort, 15 interventions were performed, with lung cancer identified in 5 (2%)—a 67% false positive rate. One stage IV lung cancer was found in a non-adherent patient who re-enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of perceived contact for follow-up was expressed as the primary reason for non-compliance in our screening program. Compliance is critical to the efficacy of any screening modality, and adherence rates to lung cancer screening may be increased through improved contact with patients via multiple avenues (i.e., phone, email, and letter). There is benefit in contacting non-adherent patients as high rates of re-enrollment are possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76563992020-11-17 Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population Seastedt, Kenneth P. Luca, Michael J. Antevil, Jared L. Browning, Robert F. Mullenix, Philip S. Reoma, Junewai L. McKay, Sean A. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports address non-adherence to screening, and our study sought to understand the non-compliant patients in our military population. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients enrolled in our screening program from 2013–2019 identified patients who failed to obtain a subsequent Low Dose CT scan (LDCT) within 15 months of their prior scan. Attempts were made to contact these patients and elucidate motivations for non-adherence via telephone. RESULTS: Of the 242 patients enrolled, 183 (76%) patients were adherent to the protocol. Significant predictors of non-adherence versus adherence were younger age (P=0.008), female sex (P=0.005), and enlisted officer rank (P=0.03). There was no difference with regards to race, smoking status, pack-years, negative screens, lung-RADS level, or nodule size. 31 (52%) non-adherent patients were contacted, and 24 (77%) reported their reason for non-adherence was lack of follow-up for a LDCT. Twenty (64%) were interested in re-enrollment. Of the total screening cohort, 15 interventions were performed, with lung cancer identified in 5 (2%)—a 67% false positive rate. One stage IV lung cancer was found in a non-adherent patient who re-enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of perceived contact for follow-up was expressed as the primary reason for non-compliance in our screening program. Compliance is critical to the efficacy of any screening modality, and adherence rates to lung cancer screening may be increased through improved contact with patients via multiple avenues (i.e., phone, email, and letter). There is benefit in contacting non-adherent patients as high rates of re-enrollment are possible. AME Publishing Company 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7656399/ /pubmed/33209424 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1841 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Seastedt, Kenneth P.
Luca, Michael J.
Antevil, Jared L.
Browning, Robert F.
Mullenix, Philip S.
Reoma, Junewai L.
McKay, Sean A.
Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
title Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
title_full Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
title_fullStr Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
title_full_unstemmed Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
title_short Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
title_sort patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209424
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1841
work_keys_str_mv AT seastedtkennethp patientmotivationsfornonadherencetolungcancerscreeninginamilitarypopulation
AT lucamichaelj patientmotivationsfornonadherencetolungcancerscreeninginamilitarypopulation
AT anteviljaredl patientmotivationsfornonadherencetolungcancerscreeninginamilitarypopulation
AT browningrobertf patientmotivationsfornonadherencetolungcancerscreeninginamilitarypopulation
AT mullenixphilips patientmotivationsfornonadherencetolungcancerscreeninginamilitarypopulation
AT reomajunewail patientmotivationsfornonadherencetolungcancerscreeninginamilitarypopulation
AT mckayseana patientmotivationsfornonadherencetolungcancerscreeninginamilitarypopulation