Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer
BACKGROUND: Long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs provide more intensive care and thus receive o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05847-6 |
_version_ | 1783608394325688320 |
---|---|
author | Makam, Anil N. Nguyen, Oanh Kieu Miller, Michael E. Shah, Sachin J. Kapinos, Kandice A. Halm, Ethan A. |
author_facet | Makam, Anil N. Nguyen, Oanh Kieu Miller, Michael E. Shah, Sachin J. Kapinos, Kandice A. Halm, Ethan A. |
author_sort | Makam, Anil N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs provide more intensive care and thus receive over triple the reimbursement of SNFs for comparable diagnoses, we sought to compare outcomes and spending between LTACH versus SNF transfer. METHODS: Using Medicare claims linked to electronic health record (EHR) data from six Texas Hospitals between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized on a medicine service in a high-LTACH use region and discharged to either an LTACH or SNF and followed for one year. The primary outcomes included mortality, 60-day recovery without inpatient care, days at home, and healthcare spending RESULTS: Of 3503 patients, 18% were transferred to an LTACH. Patients transferred to LTACHs were younger (median 71 vs. 82 years), less likely to be female (50.5 vs 66.6%) and white (69.0 vs. 84.1%), but were sicker (24.3 vs. 14.2% for prolonged intensive care unit stay; median diagnosis resource intensity weight of 2.03 vs. 1.38). In unadjusted analyses, patients transferred to an LTACH vs. SNF were less likely to survive (59.1 vs. 65.0%) or recover (62.5 vs 66.0%), and spent fewer days at home (186 vs. 200). Adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders available in Medicare claims and EHR data, LTACH transfer was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.94–1.33), recovery (SHR, 1.07, 0.93–1.23), and days spent at home (IRR, 0.96, 0.83–1.10), but was associated with greater Medicare spending ($16,689 for one year, 95% CI, $12,216–$21,162). CONCLUSION: LTACH transfer for Medicare beneficiaries is associated with similar clinical outcomes but with higher healthcare spending compared to SNF transfer. LTACH use should be reserved for patients who require complex inpatient care and cannot be cared for in SNFs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05847-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7656509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76565092020-11-12 Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer Makam, Anil N. Nguyen, Oanh Kieu Miller, Michael E. Shah, Sachin J. Kapinos, Kandice A. Halm, Ethan A. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) use varies considerably across the U.S., which may reflect uncertainty about the effectiveness of LTACHs vs. skilled nursing facilities (SNF), the principal post-acute care alternative. Given that LTACHs provide more intensive care and thus receive over triple the reimbursement of SNFs for comparable diagnoses, we sought to compare outcomes and spending between LTACH versus SNF transfer. METHODS: Using Medicare claims linked to electronic health record (EHR) data from six Texas Hospitals between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized on a medicine service in a high-LTACH use region and discharged to either an LTACH or SNF and followed for one year. The primary outcomes included mortality, 60-day recovery without inpatient care, days at home, and healthcare spending RESULTS: Of 3503 patients, 18% were transferred to an LTACH. Patients transferred to LTACHs were younger (median 71 vs. 82 years), less likely to be female (50.5 vs 66.6%) and white (69.0 vs. 84.1%), but were sicker (24.3 vs. 14.2% for prolonged intensive care unit stay; median diagnosis resource intensity weight of 2.03 vs. 1.38). In unadjusted analyses, patients transferred to an LTACH vs. SNF were less likely to survive (59.1 vs. 65.0%) or recover (62.5 vs 66.0%), and spent fewer days at home (186 vs. 200). Adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders available in Medicare claims and EHR data, LTACH transfer was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.94–1.33), recovery (SHR, 1.07, 0.93–1.23), and days spent at home (IRR, 0.96, 0.83–1.10), but was associated with greater Medicare spending ($16,689 for one year, 95% CI, $12,216–$21,162). CONCLUSION: LTACH transfer for Medicare beneficiaries is associated with similar clinical outcomes but with higher healthcare spending compared to SNF transfer. LTACH use should be reserved for patients who require complex inpatient care and cannot be cared for in SNFs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05847-6. BioMed Central 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7656509/ /pubmed/33176767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05847-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Makam, Anil N. Nguyen, Oanh Kieu Miller, Michael E. Shah, Sachin J. Kapinos, Kandice A. Halm, Ethan A. Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer |
title | Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of long-term acute care hospital versus skilled nursing facility transfer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05847-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makamaniln comparativeeffectivenessoflongtermacutecarehospitalversusskillednursingfacilitytransfer AT nguyenoanhkieu comparativeeffectivenessoflongtermacutecarehospitalversusskillednursingfacilitytransfer AT millermichaele comparativeeffectivenessoflongtermacutecarehospitalversusskillednursingfacilitytransfer AT shahsachinj comparativeeffectivenessoflongtermacutecarehospitalversusskillednursingfacilitytransfer AT kapinoskandicea comparativeeffectivenessoflongtermacutecarehospitalversusskillednursingfacilitytransfer AT halmethana comparativeeffectivenessoflongtermacutecarehospitalversusskillednursingfacilitytransfer |