Cargando…
Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol
BACKGROUND: Organizational readiness is important for the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Currently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive, valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of organizational readiness that can be used throughout the implementation process. This study aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00088-4 |
_version_ | 1783608394566860800 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Timothy J. Brandt, Heather M. Wandersman, Abraham Scaccia, Jonathan Lamont, Andrea Workman, Lauren Dias, Emanuelle Diamond, Pamela M. Craig, Derek W. Fernandez, Maria E. |
author_facet | Walker, Timothy J. Brandt, Heather M. Wandersman, Abraham Scaccia, Jonathan Lamont, Andrea Workman, Lauren Dias, Emanuelle Diamond, Pamela M. Craig, Derek W. Fernandez, Maria E. |
author_sort | Walker, Timothy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Organizational readiness is important for the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Currently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive, valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of organizational readiness that can be used throughout the implementation process. This study aims to develop a readiness measure that can be used to support implementation in two critical public health settings: federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and schools. The measure is informed by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation and R = MC(2) heuristic (readiness = motivation × innovation-specific capacity × general capacity). The study aims are to adapt and further develop the readiness measure in FQHCs implementing evidence-based interventions for colorectal cancer screening, to test the validity and reliability of the developed readiness measure in FQHCs, and to adapt and assess the usability and validity of the readiness measure in schools implementing a nutrition-based program. METHODS: For aim 1, we will conduct a series of qualitative interviews to adapt the readiness measure for use in FQHCs. We will then distribute the readiness measure to a developmental sample of 100 health center sites (up to 10 staff members per site). We will use a multilevel factor analysis approach to refine the readiness measure. For aim 2, we will distribute the measure to a different sample of 100 health center sites. We will use multilevel confirmatory factor analysis models to examine the structural validity. We will also conduct tests for scale reliability, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. For aim 3, we will use a qualitative approach to adapt the measure for use in schools and conduct reliability and validity tests similar to what is described in aim 2. DISCUSSION: This study will rigorously develop a readiness measure that will be applicable across two settings: FQHCs and schools. Information gained from the readiness measure can inform planning and implementation efforts by identifying priority areas. These priority areas can inform the selection and tailoring of support strategies that can be used throughout the implementation process to further improve implementation efforts and, in turn, program effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7656510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76565102020-11-12 Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol Walker, Timothy J. Brandt, Heather M. Wandersman, Abraham Scaccia, Jonathan Lamont, Andrea Workman, Lauren Dias, Emanuelle Diamond, Pamela M. Craig, Derek W. Fernandez, Maria E. Implement Sci Commun Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Organizational readiness is important for the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Currently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive, valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of organizational readiness that can be used throughout the implementation process. This study aims to develop a readiness measure that can be used to support implementation in two critical public health settings: federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and schools. The measure is informed by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation and R = MC(2) heuristic (readiness = motivation × innovation-specific capacity × general capacity). The study aims are to adapt and further develop the readiness measure in FQHCs implementing evidence-based interventions for colorectal cancer screening, to test the validity and reliability of the developed readiness measure in FQHCs, and to adapt and assess the usability and validity of the readiness measure in schools implementing a nutrition-based program. METHODS: For aim 1, we will conduct a series of qualitative interviews to adapt the readiness measure for use in FQHCs. We will then distribute the readiness measure to a developmental sample of 100 health center sites (up to 10 staff members per site). We will use a multilevel factor analysis approach to refine the readiness measure. For aim 2, we will distribute the measure to a different sample of 100 health center sites. We will use multilevel confirmatory factor analysis models to examine the structural validity. We will also conduct tests for scale reliability, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. For aim 3, we will use a qualitative approach to adapt the measure for use in schools and conduct reliability and validity tests similar to what is described in aim 2. DISCUSSION: This study will rigorously develop a readiness measure that will be applicable across two settings: FQHCs and schools. Information gained from the readiness measure can inform planning and implementation efforts by identifying priority areas. These priority areas can inform the selection and tailoring of support strategies that can be used throughout the implementation process to further improve implementation efforts and, in turn, program effectiveness. BioMed Central 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7656510/ /pubmed/33292840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00088-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Walker, Timothy J. Brandt, Heather M. Wandersman, Abraham Scaccia, Jonathan Lamont, Andrea Workman, Lauren Dias, Emanuelle Diamond, Pamela M. Craig, Derek W. Fernandez, Maria E. Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol |
title | Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol |
title_full | Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol |
title_fullStr | Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol |
title_short | Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol |
title_sort | development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00088-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkertimothyj developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT brandtheatherm developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT wandersmanabraham developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT scacciajonathan developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT lamontandrea developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT workmanlauren developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT diasemanuelle developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT diamondpamelam developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT craigderekw developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol AT fernandezmariae developmentofacomprehensivemeasureoforganizationalreadinessmotivationcapacityforimplementationastudyprotocol |