Cargando…

Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial

BACKGROUND: The assessment of restored teeth in dentistry remains a challenge, mainly related to the detection of caries around restorations. There is a diversity of clinical criteria available to assess the caries lesions, resulting in differences in the dentists’ diagnosis and treatment decisions....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Signori, Cácia, Moro, Bruna Lorena Pereira, Uehara, Juliana Lays Stolfo, Romero, Vitor Henrique Digmayer, de Oliveira, Elenara Ferreira, Braga, Mariana Minatel, Mendes, Fausto Medeiros, Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01307-z
_version_ 1783608410578616320
author Signori, Cácia
Moro, Bruna Lorena Pereira
Uehara, Juliana Lays Stolfo
Romero, Vitor Henrique Digmayer
de Oliveira, Elenara Ferreira
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio
author_facet Signori, Cácia
Moro, Bruna Lorena Pereira
Uehara, Juliana Lays Stolfo
Romero, Vitor Henrique Digmayer
de Oliveira, Elenara Ferreira
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio
author_sort Signori, Cácia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment of restored teeth in dentistry remains a challenge, mainly related to the detection of caries around restorations. There is a diversity of clinical criteria available to assess the caries lesions, resulting in differences in the dentists’ diagnosis and treatment decisions. In addition, there is a lack of evidence regarding the best criteria to detect caries lesions around the restorations. Thus, the present protocol aims to evaluate the effect of using 2 visual criteria to assess restored teeth on the outcomes related to oral health in adults. METHODS: The design protocol of the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults trial correspond to a triple-blind randomized, controlled clinical trial with parallel-groups. Two groups will be compared: patients who will receive the diagnosis and treatment decision according to FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria—FDI group; and patients who will receive diagnosis and treatment decision according to the “Caries Associated with Restorations or Sealants” criteria defined by the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS group). The participants will be followed up after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months, and the restoration failure will be the primary outcome. The analysis will be conducted through Cox regression with shared frailty. The impact of oral health on quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the methods used will be the secondary outcomes. Two-tailed analyzes will be used, considering a level of significance of 5%. DISCUSSION: This is the first clinical trial to assess the effect of using two visual methods to detect caries lesions around restorations on the outcomes related to oral health in adults. The findings of this study will define what is the best diagnostic strategy for the assessment of caries around restorations in permanent teeth. Trial registration NCT03108586 (registered 11 April 2017).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76567312020-11-13 Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial Signori, Cácia Moro, Bruna Lorena Pereira Uehara, Juliana Lays Stolfo Romero, Vitor Henrique Digmayer de Oliveira, Elenara Ferreira Braga, Mariana Minatel Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio BMC Oral Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The assessment of restored teeth in dentistry remains a challenge, mainly related to the detection of caries around restorations. There is a diversity of clinical criteria available to assess the caries lesions, resulting in differences in the dentists’ diagnosis and treatment decisions. In addition, there is a lack of evidence regarding the best criteria to detect caries lesions around the restorations. Thus, the present protocol aims to evaluate the effect of using 2 visual criteria to assess restored teeth on the outcomes related to oral health in adults. METHODS: The design protocol of the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults trial correspond to a triple-blind randomized, controlled clinical trial with parallel-groups. Two groups will be compared: patients who will receive the diagnosis and treatment decision according to FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria—FDI group; and patients who will receive diagnosis and treatment decision according to the “Caries Associated with Restorations or Sealants” criteria defined by the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS group). The participants will be followed up after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months, and the restoration failure will be the primary outcome. The analysis will be conducted through Cox regression with shared frailty. The impact of oral health on quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the methods used will be the secondary outcomes. Two-tailed analyzes will be used, considering a level of significance of 5%. DISCUSSION: This is the first clinical trial to assess the effect of using two visual methods to detect caries lesions around restorations on the outcomes related to oral health in adults. The findings of this study will define what is the best diagnostic strategy for the assessment of caries around restorations in permanent teeth. Trial registration NCT03108586 (registered 11 April 2017). BioMed Central 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7656731/ /pubmed/33172449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01307-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Signori, Cácia
Moro, Bruna Lorena Pereira
Uehara, Juliana Lays Stolfo
Romero, Vitor Henrique Digmayer
de Oliveira, Elenara Ferreira
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio
Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial
title Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial
title_full Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial
title_fullStr Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial
title_short Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial
title_sort study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the caries cognition and identification in adults (cacia) trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01307-z
work_keys_str_mv AT signoricacia studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT morobrunalorenapereira studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT ueharajulianalaysstolfo studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT romerovitorhenriquedigmayer studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT deoliveiraelenaraferreira studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT bragamarianaminatel studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT mendesfaustomedeiros studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT cencimaximilianosergio studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial
AT studyprotocolforadiagnosticrandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatetheeffectoftheuseoftwoclinicalcriteriaintheassessmentofcarieslesionsaroundrestorationsinadultsthecariescognitionandidentificationinadultscaciatrial