Cargando…

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock complicates 5–10% of myocardial infarction (MI) cases. Data about the benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in these patients is sparse and conflicting. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of studies assessing the im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saleiro, Carolina, Teixeira, Rogério, De Campos, Diana, Lopes, João, Oliveiros, Bárbara, Costa, Marco, Gonçalves, Lino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00502-y
_version_ 1783608414166843392
author Saleiro, Carolina
Teixeira, Rogério
De Campos, Diana
Lopes, João
Oliveiros, Bárbara
Costa, Marco
Gonçalves, Lino
author_facet Saleiro, Carolina
Teixeira, Rogério
De Campos, Diana
Lopes, João
Oliveiros, Bárbara
Costa, Marco
Gonçalves, Lino
author_sort Saleiro, Carolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock complicates 5–10% of myocardial infarction (MI) cases. Data about the benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in these patients is sparse and conflicting. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of studies assessing the impact of GPI use in the setting of MI complicated cardiogenic shock on mortality, angiographic success, and bleeding events. We systematically searched for studies comparing GPI use as adjunctive treatment versus standard care in this setting. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 1216 patients (GPI group, 720 patients; standard care group, 496 patients) were included. GPI were associated with a 45% relative reduction in the odds of death at 30 days (pooled OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.85; I(2) = 57%; P = 0.007) and a 49% reduction in the odds of death at 1 year (pooled OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.32–0.82; I(2) = 58%; P = 0.005). Reduction in short-term mortality seemed to be more important before 2000, as this benefit disappears if only the more recent studies are analyzed. GPI were associated with a 2-fold increase in the probability of achieving TIMI 3 flow (pooled OR, 2.05; 95% CI 1.37–3.05; I(2) = 37%, P = 0.0004). Major bleeding events were not increased with GPI therapy (pooled OR, 1.0; 95% CI 0.55–1.83; I(2) = 1%, P = 0.99). Meta-regression identified that patients not receiving an intra-aortic balloon pump seemed to benefit the most from GPI use (Z = − 1.57, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: GPI therapy as an adjunct to standard treatment in cardiogenic shock was associated with better outcomes, including both short- and long-term survival, without increasing the risk of bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76567502020-11-12 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression Saleiro, Carolina Teixeira, Rogério De Campos, Diana Lopes, João Oliveiros, Bárbara Costa, Marco Gonçalves, Lino J Intensive Care Review BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock complicates 5–10% of myocardial infarction (MI) cases. Data about the benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in these patients is sparse and conflicting. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of studies assessing the impact of GPI use in the setting of MI complicated cardiogenic shock on mortality, angiographic success, and bleeding events. We systematically searched for studies comparing GPI use as adjunctive treatment versus standard care in this setting. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 1216 patients (GPI group, 720 patients; standard care group, 496 patients) were included. GPI were associated with a 45% relative reduction in the odds of death at 30 days (pooled OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.85; I(2) = 57%; P = 0.007) and a 49% reduction in the odds of death at 1 year (pooled OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.32–0.82; I(2) = 58%; P = 0.005). Reduction in short-term mortality seemed to be more important before 2000, as this benefit disappears if only the more recent studies are analyzed. GPI were associated with a 2-fold increase in the probability of achieving TIMI 3 flow (pooled OR, 2.05; 95% CI 1.37–3.05; I(2) = 37%, P = 0.0004). Major bleeding events were not increased with GPI therapy (pooled OR, 1.0; 95% CI 0.55–1.83; I(2) = 1%, P = 0.99). Meta-regression identified that patients not receiving an intra-aortic balloon pump seemed to benefit the most from GPI use (Z = − 1.57, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: GPI therapy as an adjunct to standard treatment in cardiogenic shock was associated with better outcomes, including both short- and long-term survival, without increasing the risk of bleeding. BioMed Central 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7656750/ /pubmed/33292610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00502-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Saleiro, Carolina
Teixeira, Rogério
De Campos, Diana
Lopes, João
Oliveiros, Bárbara
Costa, Marco
Gonçalves, Lino
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
title Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
title_full Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
title_fullStr Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
title_full_unstemmed Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
title_short Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
title_sort glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibitors for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00502-y
work_keys_str_mv AT saleirocarolina glycoproteiniibiiiainhibitorsforcardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctionasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT teixeirarogerio glycoproteiniibiiiainhibitorsforcardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctionasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT decamposdiana glycoproteiniibiiiainhibitorsforcardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctionasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT lopesjoao glycoproteiniibiiiainhibitorsforcardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctionasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT oliveirosbarbara glycoproteiniibiiiainhibitorsforcardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctionasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT costamarco glycoproteiniibiiiainhibitorsforcardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctionasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT goncalveslino glycoproteiniibiiiainhibitorsforcardiogenicshockcomplicatingacutemyocardialinfarctionasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression