Cargando…

The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper

Introduction: Medical quality indicators (QI) are important tools in the evaluation of medical quality. Their development is subject to specific methodological requirements, which include practical applicability. This is especially true for intensive care medicine with its complex processes and thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumpf, Oliver, Nothacker, Monika, Braun, Jan, Muhl, Elke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33214791
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/000285
_version_ 1783608421211176960
author Kumpf, Oliver
Nothacker, Monika
Braun, Jan
Muhl, Elke
author_facet Kumpf, Oliver
Nothacker, Monika
Braun, Jan
Muhl, Elke
author_sort Kumpf, Oliver
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Medical quality indicators (QI) are important tools in the evaluation of medical quality. Their development is subject to specific methodological requirements, which include practical applicability. This is especially true for intensive care medicine with its complex processes and their interactions. This methods paper presents the status quo and shows necessary methodological developments for intensive care QI. For this purpose, a cooperation with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies’ Institute for Medical Knowledge Management (AWMF-IMWi) was established. Methodology: Review of published German manuals for QI development from guidelines and narrative review of quality indicators with a focus on evidence and consensus-based guideline recommendations. Future methodological adaptations of indicator development for improved operationalization, measurability and pilot testing are presented, and a development process is proposed. Results: The development of intensive care quality indicators in Germany is based on an established process. In the future, additional evaluation criteria (QUALIFY criteria) will be applied to assess the evidence base. In addition, a continuous exchange between the national steering committee of the DIVI responsible for QI development and guideline development groups involved in intensive care medicine is planned. Conclusion: Intensive care quality indicators will have to meet improved methodological requirements in the future by means of an improved development process. Future QI development is intended to improve the structure of the development process, with a focus on scientific evidence and a link to guideline projects. This is intended to achieve the goal of a broad application of QI and to further evaluate its relevance for patient outcome and performance of institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76568102020-11-18 The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper Kumpf, Oliver Nothacker, Monika Braun, Jan Muhl, Elke Ger Med Sci Article Introduction: Medical quality indicators (QI) are important tools in the evaluation of medical quality. Their development is subject to specific methodological requirements, which include practical applicability. This is especially true for intensive care medicine with its complex processes and their interactions. This methods paper presents the status quo and shows necessary methodological developments for intensive care QI. For this purpose, a cooperation with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies’ Institute for Medical Knowledge Management (AWMF-IMWi) was established. Methodology: Review of published German manuals for QI development from guidelines and narrative review of quality indicators with a focus on evidence and consensus-based guideline recommendations. Future methodological adaptations of indicator development for improved operationalization, measurability and pilot testing are presented, and a development process is proposed. Results: The development of intensive care quality indicators in Germany is based on an established process. In the future, additional evaluation criteria (QUALIFY criteria) will be applied to assess the evidence base. In addition, a continuous exchange between the national steering committee of the DIVI responsible for QI development and guideline development groups involved in intensive care medicine is planned. Conclusion: Intensive care quality indicators will have to meet improved methodological requirements in the future by means of an improved development process. Future QI development is intended to improve the structure of the development process, with a focus on scientific evidence and a link to guideline projects. This is intended to achieve the goal of a broad application of QI and to further evaluate its relevance for patient outcome and performance of institutions. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2020-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7656810/ /pubmed/33214791 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/000285 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kumpf et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kumpf, Oliver
Nothacker, Monika
Braun, Jan
Muhl, Elke
The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper
title The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper
title_full The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper
title_fullStr The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper
title_full_unstemmed The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper
title_short The future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper
title_sort future development of intensive care quality indicators – a methods paper
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33214791
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/000285
work_keys_str_mv AT kumpfoliver thefuturedevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper
AT nothackermonika thefuturedevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper
AT braunjan thefuturedevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper
AT muhlelke thefuturedevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper
AT kumpfoliver futuredevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper
AT nothackermonika futuredevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper
AT braunjan futuredevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper
AT muhlelke futuredevelopmentofintensivecarequalityindicatorsamethodspaper