Cargando…

Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: To map the extant literature evaluating the use of technology for goal setting in adult rehabilitation and the impact of technology for patient outcomes. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), AMED and Scopus were searched for articles describing observat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strubbia, Carla, Levack, William Mark Magnus, Grainger, Rebecca, Takahashi, Kayoko, Tomori, Kounosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041730
_version_ 1783608433644142592
author Strubbia, Carla
Levack, William Mark Magnus
Grainger, Rebecca
Takahashi, Kayoko
Tomori, Kounosuke
author_facet Strubbia, Carla
Levack, William Mark Magnus
Grainger, Rebecca
Takahashi, Kayoko
Tomori, Kounosuke
author_sort Strubbia, Carla
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To map the extant literature evaluating the use of technology for goal setting in adult rehabilitation and the impact of technology for patient outcomes. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), AMED and Scopus were searched for articles describing observational or interventional studies. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database were searched for grey literature. Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts for potentially relevant articles. We included articles describing studies that had evaluated the development or application of technology to facilitate goal setting in rehabilitation for adults. Articles were excluded if the technology described did not include features to facilitate goal setting or were not in English. Narrative reviews, opinion pieces and editorials were also excluded. RESULTS: After screening 1640 publications of potential interest, we identified 27 studies for inclusion. These 27 articles described studies involving a total of 16 different technologies including, seven mobile apps, three websites, two mobile apps/website hybrids, two apps and two websites connected to a pedometer. We found that most technologies described were designed to facilitate self-management with goal setting as a feature and that only five included a shared decision moment around goal setting. Only six of the 16 technologies had research providing evidence of effectiveness in terms of improved patient outcomes, with the best evidence of beneficial effects associated with technologies that linked goal setting to pedometer use. CONCLUSIONS: The identified technologies for use in adult rehabilitation that included goal setting as a feature were largely accepted and valued by patients and health professionals. The limited data suggest that there is a need for further research; specific foci may include the impact of incorporation of a shared decision-making moment and evaluation of effectiveness on patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7656911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76569112020-11-17 Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review Strubbia, Carla Levack, William Mark Magnus Grainger, Rebecca Takahashi, Kayoko Tomori, Kounosuke BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To map the extant literature evaluating the use of technology for goal setting in adult rehabilitation and the impact of technology for patient outcomes. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: MEDLINE (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), AMED and Scopus were searched for articles describing observational or interventional studies. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database were searched for grey literature. Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts for potentially relevant articles. We included articles describing studies that had evaluated the development or application of technology to facilitate goal setting in rehabilitation for adults. Articles were excluded if the technology described did not include features to facilitate goal setting or were not in English. Narrative reviews, opinion pieces and editorials were also excluded. RESULTS: After screening 1640 publications of potential interest, we identified 27 studies for inclusion. These 27 articles described studies involving a total of 16 different technologies including, seven mobile apps, three websites, two mobile apps/website hybrids, two apps and two websites connected to a pedometer. We found that most technologies described were designed to facilitate self-management with goal setting as a feature and that only five included a shared decision moment around goal setting. Only six of the 16 technologies had research providing evidence of effectiveness in terms of improved patient outcomes, with the best evidence of beneficial effects associated with technologies that linked goal setting to pedometer use. CONCLUSIONS: The identified technologies for use in adult rehabilitation that included goal setting as a feature were largely accepted and valued by patients and health professionals. The limited data suggest that there is a need for further research; specific foci may include the impact of incorporation of a shared decision-making moment and evaluation of effectiveness on patient outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7656911/ /pubmed/33172946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041730 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Strubbia, Carla
Levack, William Mark Magnus
Grainger, Rebecca
Takahashi, Kayoko
Tomori, Kounosuke
Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review
title Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review
title_full Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review
title_fullStr Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review
title_short Use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review
title_sort use of technology in supporting goal setting in rehabilitation for adults: a scoping review
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041730
work_keys_str_mv AT strubbiacarla useoftechnologyinsupportinggoalsettinginrehabilitationforadultsascopingreview
AT levackwilliammarkmagnus useoftechnologyinsupportinggoalsettinginrehabilitationforadultsascopingreview
AT graingerrebecca useoftechnologyinsupportinggoalsettinginrehabilitationforadultsascopingreview
AT takahashikayoko useoftechnologyinsupportinggoalsettinginrehabilitationforadultsascopingreview
AT tomorikounosuke useoftechnologyinsupportinggoalsettinginrehabilitationforadultsascopingreview