Cargando…

Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment

Faecal Sludge Management (FSM) has become a prominent environmental concern in the today’s world. Dewatering of sludge and the treatment of wastewater (WW) are the prime spiny issue because of the deleterious essence of faecal sludge (FS) and WW in the environment. The main focus of this study was o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishuk, Mehedi Hasan, Islam, S. M. Tariqul, Alamgir, Muhammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7657504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33175866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241046
_version_ 1783608516384129024
author Mishuk, Mehedi Hasan
Islam, S. M. Tariqul
Alamgir, Muhammed
author_facet Mishuk, Mehedi Hasan
Islam, S. M. Tariqul
Alamgir, Muhammed
author_sort Mishuk, Mehedi Hasan
collection PubMed
description Faecal Sludge Management (FSM) has become a prominent environmental concern in the today’s world. Dewatering of sludge and the treatment of wastewater (WW) are the prime spiny issue because of the deleterious essence of faecal sludge (FS) and WW in the environment. The main focus of this study was on FSM by ‘Deebag’ and ‘Jute Bag’ through dewatering and filtering. Deebag is a dewatering as well as filtering media which is made with geotextile and polypropylene. Contrariwise, three types of jute bags were made of jute fiber for using as the same purposes of Deebag. A polyacrylamide polymer was used in this study and both filtering and dewatering were done in two ways—with and without the presence of polymer. Biochemical Oxygen Demand at 5 days (BOD(5)), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), pH, Electrical Conductivity (EC), Chloride (Cl(-)), Phosphate (PO(4)(3-)), Nitrate (NO(3)(-)), Total Suspended Solid (TSS) and Total Dissolved Solid (TDS) parameters of raw and filtering samples were analyzed to assess the performance of WW treatment by Deebag and jute bags. Only using polymer was observed as one kind of treatment of WW. Deebag has been found to show the maximum dewatering capacity as well as treatment efficiency comparing with the jute bags. However, among three types of jute bags, double jute layered bag has shown the best performance. Maximum dewatering for Deebag and jute bags were found 88% and 83% respectively while using the polymer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7657504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76575042020-11-18 Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment Mishuk, Mehedi Hasan Islam, S. M. Tariqul Alamgir, Muhammed PLoS One Research Article Faecal Sludge Management (FSM) has become a prominent environmental concern in the today’s world. Dewatering of sludge and the treatment of wastewater (WW) are the prime spiny issue because of the deleterious essence of faecal sludge (FS) and WW in the environment. The main focus of this study was on FSM by ‘Deebag’ and ‘Jute Bag’ through dewatering and filtering. Deebag is a dewatering as well as filtering media which is made with geotextile and polypropylene. Contrariwise, three types of jute bags were made of jute fiber for using as the same purposes of Deebag. A polyacrylamide polymer was used in this study and both filtering and dewatering were done in two ways—with and without the presence of polymer. Biochemical Oxygen Demand at 5 days (BOD(5)), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), pH, Electrical Conductivity (EC), Chloride (Cl(-)), Phosphate (PO(4)(3-)), Nitrate (NO(3)(-)), Total Suspended Solid (TSS) and Total Dissolved Solid (TDS) parameters of raw and filtering samples were analyzed to assess the performance of WW treatment by Deebag and jute bags. Only using polymer was observed as one kind of treatment of WW. Deebag has been found to show the maximum dewatering capacity as well as treatment efficiency comparing with the jute bags. However, among three types of jute bags, double jute layered bag has shown the best performance. Maximum dewatering for Deebag and jute bags were found 88% and 83% respectively while using the polymer. Public Library of Science 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7657504/ /pubmed/33175866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241046 Text en © 2020 Mishuk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mishuk, Mehedi Hasan
Islam, S. M. Tariqul
Alamgir, Muhammed
Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment
title Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment
title_full Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment
title_short Comparison of the efficiency of Deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment
title_sort comparison of the efficiency of deebag and jute made bag for faecal sludge management and wastewater treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7657504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33175866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241046
work_keys_str_mv AT mishukmehedihasan comparisonoftheefficiencyofdeebagandjutemadebagforfaecalsludgemanagementandwastewatertreatment
AT islamsmtariqul comparisonoftheefficiencyofdeebagandjutemadebagforfaecalsludgemanagementandwastewatertreatment
AT alamgirmuhammed comparisonoftheefficiencyofdeebagandjutemadebagforfaecalsludgemanagementandwastewatertreatment