Cargando…

Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard of care for various tumor types. Their unique spectrum of side effects demands continuous and long-lasting assessment of symptoms. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) follow-up has been shown to improve survival and qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iivanainen, Sanna, Alanko, Tuomo, Vihinen, Pia, Konkola, Teemu, Ekstrom, Jussi, Virtanen, Henri, Koivunen, Jussi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7657724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112242
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17898
_version_ 1783608556103139328
author Iivanainen, Sanna
Alanko, Tuomo
Vihinen, Pia
Konkola, Teemu
Ekstrom, Jussi
Virtanen, Henri
Koivunen, Jussi
author_facet Iivanainen, Sanna
Alanko, Tuomo
Vihinen, Pia
Konkola, Teemu
Ekstrom, Jussi
Virtanen, Henri
Koivunen, Jussi
author_sort Iivanainen, Sanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard of care for various tumor types. Their unique spectrum of side effects demands continuous and long-lasting assessment of symptoms. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) follow-up has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether ePRO follow-up of cancer patients treated with ICIs is feasible. The study analyzed (1) the variety of patient reported symptoms, (2) etiology of alerts, (3) symptom correlations, and (4) patient compliance. METHODS: In this prospective, one-arm, multi-institutional study, we recruited adult cancer patients whose advanced cancer was treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD)- ligand (L)1 agents in outpatient settings. The ePRO tool consisted of a weekly questionnaire evaluating the presence of typical side effects, with an algorithm assessing the severity of the symptom according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and an urgency algorithm sending alerts to the care team. A patient experience survey was conducted monthly. The patients were followed up to 6 months or until disease progression. RESULTS: A total of 889 symptom questionnaires was completed by 37 patients (lung cancer, n=15; melanoma, n=9; genitourinary cancer, n=9; head and neck cancer, n=4). Patients showed good adherence to ePRO follow-up. The most common grade 1 symptoms were fatigue (28%) and itching (13%), grade 2 symptoms were loss of appetite (12%) and nausea (12%), and grade 3-4 symptoms were cough (6%) and loss of appetite (4%). The most common reasons for alerts were loss of appetite and shortness of breath. In the treatment benefit analysis, positive correlations were seen between clinical benefit and itching as well as progressive disease and chest pain. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, ePRO follow-up of cancer patients receiving ICIs is feasible. ePROs capture a wide range of symptoms. Some symptoms correlate to treatment benefit, suggesting that individual prediction models could be generated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Register, NCT3928938; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03928938
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7657724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76577242020-11-13 Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study Iivanainen, Sanna Alanko, Tuomo Vihinen, Pia Konkola, Teemu Ekstrom, Jussi Virtanen, Henri Koivunen, Jussi JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard of care for various tumor types. Their unique spectrum of side effects demands continuous and long-lasting assessment of symptoms. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) follow-up has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether ePRO follow-up of cancer patients treated with ICIs is feasible. The study analyzed (1) the variety of patient reported symptoms, (2) etiology of alerts, (3) symptom correlations, and (4) patient compliance. METHODS: In this prospective, one-arm, multi-institutional study, we recruited adult cancer patients whose advanced cancer was treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD)- ligand (L)1 agents in outpatient settings. The ePRO tool consisted of a weekly questionnaire evaluating the presence of typical side effects, with an algorithm assessing the severity of the symptom according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and an urgency algorithm sending alerts to the care team. A patient experience survey was conducted monthly. The patients were followed up to 6 months or until disease progression. RESULTS: A total of 889 symptom questionnaires was completed by 37 patients (lung cancer, n=15; melanoma, n=9; genitourinary cancer, n=9; head and neck cancer, n=4). Patients showed good adherence to ePRO follow-up. The most common grade 1 symptoms were fatigue (28%) and itching (13%), grade 2 symptoms were loss of appetite (12%) and nausea (12%), and grade 3-4 symptoms were cough (6%) and loss of appetite (4%). The most common reasons for alerts were loss of appetite and shortness of breath. In the treatment benefit analysis, positive correlations were seen between clinical benefit and itching as well as progressive disease and chest pain. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, ePRO follow-up of cancer patients receiving ICIs is feasible. ePROs capture a wide range of symptoms. Some symptoms correlate to treatment benefit, suggesting that individual prediction models could be generated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Register, NCT3928938; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03928938 JMIR Publications 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7657724/ /pubmed/33112242 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17898 Text en ©Sanna Iivanainen, Tuomo Alanko, Pia Vihinen, Teemu Konkola, Jussi Ekstrom, Henri Virtanen, Jussi Koivunen. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 28.10.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Iivanainen, Sanna
Alanko, Tuomo
Vihinen, Pia
Konkola, Teemu
Ekstrom, Jussi
Virtanen, Henri
Koivunen, Jussi
Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study
title Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study
title_full Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study
title_fullStr Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study
title_short Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study
title_sort follow-up of cancer patients receiving anti-pd-(l)1 therapy using an electronic patient-reported outcomes tool (kiss): prospective feasibility cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7657724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112242
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17898
work_keys_str_mv AT iivanainensanna followupofcancerpatientsreceivingantipdl1therapyusinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomestoolkissprospectivefeasibilitycohortstudy
AT alankotuomo followupofcancerpatientsreceivingantipdl1therapyusinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomestoolkissprospectivefeasibilitycohortstudy
AT vihinenpia followupofcancerpatientsreceivingantipdl1therapyusinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomestoolkissprospectivefeasibilitycohortstudy
AT konkolateemu followupofcancerpatientsreceivingantipdl1therapyusinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomestoolkissprospectivefeasibilitycohortstudy
AT ekstromjussi followupofcancerpatientsreceivingantipdl1therapyusinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomestoolkissprospectivefeasibilitycohortstudy
AT virtanenhenri followupofcancerpatientsreceivingantipdl1therapyusinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomestoolkissprospectivefeasibilitycohortstudy
AT koivunenjussi followupofcancerpatientsreceivingantipdl1therapyusinganelectronicpatientreportedoutcomestoolkissprospectivefeasibilitycohortstudy