Cargando…

Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives

Advances in molecular and synthetic biology are enabling the engineering of gene drives in insects for disease vector/pest control. Engineered gene drives (that bias their own inheritance) can be designed either to suppress interbreeding target populations or modify them with a new genotype. Dependi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian C, Epstein, Michelle M, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco J, Mullins, Ewen, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose J, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Bonsall, Michael B, Mumford, John, Wimmer, Ernst A, Devos, Yann, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos, Firbank, Leslie G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7658669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209154
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297
_version_ 1783608721581015040
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian C
Epstein, Michelle M
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco J
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose J
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Bonsall, Michael B
Mumford, John
Wimmer, Ernst A
Devos, Yann
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Firbank, Leslie G
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian C
Epstein, Michelle M
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco J
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose J
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Bonsall, Michael B
Mumford, John
Wimmer, Ernst A
Devos, Yann
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Firbank, Leslie G
collection PubMed
description Advances in molecular and synthetic biology are enabling the engineering of gene drives in insects for disease vector/pest control. Engineered gene drives (that bias their own inheritance) can be designed either to suppress interbreeding target populations or modify them with a new genotype. Depending on the engineered gene drive system, theoretically, a genetic modification of interest could spread through target populations and persist indefinitely, or be restricted in its spread or persistence. While research on engineered gene drives and their applications in insects is advancing at a fast pace, it will take several years for technological developments to move to practical applications for deliberate release into the environment. Some gene drive modified insects (GDMIs) have been tested experimentally in the laboratory, but none has been assessed in small‐scale confined field trials or in open release trials as yet. There is concern that the deliberate release of GDMIs in the environment may have possible irreversible and unintended consequences. As a proactive measure, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has been requested by the European Commission to review whether its previously published guidelines for the risk assessment of genetically modified animals (EFSA, 2012 and 2013), including insects (GMIs), are adequate and sufficient for GDMIs, primarily disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species, for deliberate release into the environment. Under this mandate, EFSA was not requested to develop risk assessment guidelines for GDMIs. In this Scientific Opinion, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) concludes that EFSA's guidelines are adequate, but insufficient for the molecular characterisation (MC), environmental risk assessment (ERA) and post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GDMIs. While the MC,ERA and PMEM of GDMIs can build on the existing risk assessment framework for GMIs that do not contain engineered gene drives, there are specific areas where further guidance is needed for GDMIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7658669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76586692020-11-17 Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian C Epstein, Michelle M Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco J Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose J Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Bonsall, Michael B Mumford, John Wimmer, Ernst A Devos, Yann Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Firbank, Leslie G EFSA J Scientific Opinion Advances in molecular and synthetic biology are enabling the engineering of gene drives in insects for disease vector/pest control. Engineered gene drives (that bias their own inheritance) can be designed either to suppress interbreeding target populations or modify them with a new genotype. Depending on the engineered gene drive system, theoretically, a genetic modification of interest could spread through target populations and persist indefinitely, or be restricted in its spread or persistence. While research on engineered gene drives and their applications in insects is advancing at a fast pace, it will take several years for technological developments to move to practical applications for deliberate release into the environment. Some gene drive modified insects (GDMIs) have been tested experimentally in the laboratory, but none has been assessed in small‐scale confined field trials or in open release trials as yet. There is concern that the deliberate release of GDMIs in the environment may have possible irreversible and unintended consequences. As a proactive measure, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has been requested by the European Commission to review whether its previously published guidelines for the risk assessment of genetically modified animals (EFSA, 2012 and 2013), including insects (GMIs), are adequate and sufficient for GDMIs, primarily disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species, for deliberate release into the environment. Under this mandate, EFSA was not requested to develop risk assessment guidelines for GDMIs. In this Scientific Opinion, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) concludes that EFSA's guidelines are adequate, but insufficient for the molecular characterisation (MC), environmental risk assessment (ERA) and post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GDMIs. While the MC,ERA and PMEM of GDMIs can build on the existing risk assessment framework for GMIs that do not contain engineered gene drives, there are specific areas where further guidance is needed for GDMIs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7658669/ /pubmed/33209154 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian C
Epstein, Michelle M
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco J
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose J
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Bonsall, Michael B
Mumford, John
Wimmer, Ernst A
Devos, Yann
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Firbank, Leslie G
Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
title Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
title_full Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
title_fullStr Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
title_full_unstemmed Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
title_short Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
title_sort adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing efsa guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7658669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209154
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297
work_keys_str_mv AT adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT naegelihanspeter adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT bressonjeanlouis adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT dalmaytamas adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT dewhurstianc adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT epsteinmichellem adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT guerchephilippe adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT hejatkojan adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT morenofranciscoj adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT mullinsewen adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT noguefabien adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT rostoksnils adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT sanchezserranojosej adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT savoinigiovanni adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT veromanneve adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT veronesifabio adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT bonsallmichaelb adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT mumfordjohn adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT wimmerernsta adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT devosyann adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives
AT firbankleslieg adequacyandsufficiencyevaluationofexistingefsaguidelinesforthemolecularcharacterisationenvironmentalriskassessmentandpostmarketenvironmentalmonitoringofgeneticallymodifiedinsectscontainingengineeredgenedrives