Cargando…

Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Randomized controlled trials of licensed oral rotavirus group A (RVA) vaccines, indicated lower efficacy in developing countries compared to developed countries. We investigated the pooled effectiveness of Rotarix (® )in Africa in 2019, a decade since progressive introduction began in 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murunga, Nickson, P. Otieno, Grieven, Maia, Marta, N. Agoti, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7658728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215049
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16174.2
_version_ 1783608733057679360
author Murunga, Nickson
P. Otieno, Grieven
Maia, Marta
N. Agoti, Charles
author_facet Murunga, Nickson
P. Otieno, Grieven
Maia, Marta
N. Agoti, Charles
author_sort Murunga, Nickson
collection PubMed
description Background: Randomized controlled trials of licensed oral rotavirus group A (RVA) vaccines, indicated lower efficacy in developing countries compared to developed countries. We investigated the pooled effectiveness of Rotarix (® )in Africa in 2019, a decade since progressive introduction began in 2009. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed to identify studies that investigated the effectiveness of routine RVA vaccination in an African country between 2009 and 2019. A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate pooled effectiveness of the full-dose versus partial-dose of Rotarix (®) (RV1) vaccine and in different age groups. Pooled odds ratios were estimated using random effects model and the risk of bias assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: By December 2019, 39 (72%) countries in Africa had introduced RVA vaccination, of which 34 were using RV1. Thirteen eligible studies from eight countries were included in meta-analysis for vaccine effectiveness (VE) of RVA by vaccine dosage (full or partial) and age categories. Pooled RV1 VE against RVA associated hospitalizations was 44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28-57%) for partial dose versus 58% (95% CI 50-65%) for full dose. VE was 61% (95% CI 50-69%), 55% (95% CI 32-71%), 56% (95% CI 43-67%), and 61% (95% CI 42-73%) for children aged <12 months, 12-23 months, <24 months and 12-59 months, respectively. Conclusion: RV1 vaccine use has resulted in a significant reduction in severe diarrhoea in African children and its VE is close to the efficacy findings observed in clinical trials. RV1 VE point estimate was higher for children who received full dose than those who received partial dose, and its protection lasted beyond the first year of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7658728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76587282020-11-18 Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis Murunga, Nickson P. Otieno, Grieven Maia, Marta N. Agoti, Charles Wellcome Open Res Systematic Review Background: Randomized controlled trials of licensed oral rotavirus group A (RVA) vaccines, indicated lower efficacy in developing countries compared to developed countries. We investigated the pooled effectiveness of Rotarix (® )in Africa in 2019, a decade since progressive introduction began in 2009. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed to identify studies that investigated the effectiveness of routine RVA vaccination in an African country between 2009 and 2019. A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate pooled effectiveness of the full-dose versus partial-dose of Rotarix (®) (RV1) vaccine and in different age groups. Pooled odds ratios were estimated using random effects model and the risk of bias assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: By December 2019, 39 (72%) countries in Africa had introduced RVA vaccination, of which 34 were using RV1. Thirteen eligible studies from eight countries were included in meta-analysis for vaccine effectiveness (VE) of RVA by vaccine dosage (full or partial) and age categories. Pooled RV1 VE against RVA associated hospitalizations was 44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28-57%) for partial dose versus 58% (95% CI 50-65%) for full dose. VE was 61% (95% CI 50-69%), 55% (95% CI 32-71%), 56% (95% CI 43-67%), and 61% (95% CI 42-73%) for children aged <12 months, 12-23 months, <24 months and 12-59 months, respectively. Conclusion: RV1 vaccine use has resulted in a significant reduction in severe diarrhoea in African children and its VE is close to the efficacy findings observed in clinical trials. RV1 VE point estimate was higher for children who received full dose than those who received partial dose, and its protection lasted beyond the first year of life. F1000 Research Limited 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7658728/ /pubmed/33215049 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16174.2 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Murunga N et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Murunga, Nickson
P. Otieno, Grieven
Maia, Marta
N. Agoti, Charles
Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Rotarix (®) vaccine in Africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of rotarix (®) vaccine in africa in the first decade of progressive introduction, 2009-2019:  systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7658728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215049
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16174.2
work_keys_str_mv AT murunganickson effectivenessofrotarixvaccineinafricainthefirstdecadeofprogressiveintroduction20092019systematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT potienogrieven effectivenessofrotarixvaccineinafricainthefirstdecadeofprogressiveintroduction20092019systematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maiamarta effectivenessofrotarixvaccineinafricainthefirstdecadeofprogressiveintroduction20092019systematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nagoticharles effectivenessofrotarixvaccineinafricainthefirstdecadeofprogressiveintroduction20092019systematicreviewandmetaanalysis