Cargando…
A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy
BACKGROUND: Leprosy control achieved dramatic success in the 1980s–1990s with the implementation of short course multidrug therapy, which reduced the global prevalence of leprosy to less than 1 in 10 000 population. However, a period of relative stagnation in leprosy control followed this achievemen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7658911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33183339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00774-4 |
_version_ | 1783608747488182272 |
---|---|
author | Steinmann, Peter Dusenbury, Courtenay Addiss, David Mirza, Fareed Smith, W. Cairns S. |
author_facet | Steinmann, Peter Dusenbury, Courtenay Addiss, David Mirza, Fareed Smith, W. Cairns S. |
author_sort | Steinmann, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Leprosy control achieved dramatic success in the 1980s–1990s with the implementation of short course multidrug therapy, which reduced the global prevalence of leprosy to less than 1 in 10 000 population. However, a period of relative stagnation in leprosy control followed this achievement, and only limited further declines in the global number of new cases reported have been achieved over the past decade. MAIN TEXT: In 2016, major stakeholders called for the development of an innovative and comprehensive leprosy strategy aimed at reducing the incidence of leprosy, lowering the burden of disability and discrimination, and interrupting transmission. This led to the establishment of the Global Partnership for Zero Leprosy (GPZL) in 2018, with partners aligned around a shared Action Framework committed to achieving the WHO targets by 2030 through national leprosy program capacity-building, resource mobilisation and an enabling research agenda. GPZL convened over 140 experts from more than 20 countries to develop a research agenda to achieve zero leprosy. The result is a detailed research agenda focusing on diagnostics, mapping, digital technology and innovation, disability, epidemiological modelling and investment case, implementation research, stigma, post exposure prophylaxis and transmission, and vaccines. This research agenda is aligned with the research priorities identified by other stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Developing and achieving consensus on the research agenda for zero leprosy is a significant step forward for the leprosy community. In a next step, research programmes must be developed, with individual components of the research agenda requiring distinct expertise, varying in resource needs, and operating over different timescales. Moving toward zero leprosy now requires partner alignment and new investments at all stages of the research process, from discovery to implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7658911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76589112020-11-12 A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy Steinmann, Peter Dusenbury, Courtenay Addiss, David Mirza, Fareed Smith, W. Cairns S. Infect Dis Poverty Commentary BACKGROUND: Leprosy control achieved dramatic success in the 1980s–1990s with the implementation of short course multidrug therapy, which reduced the global prevalence of leprosy to less than 1 in 10 000 population. However, a period of relative stagnation in leprosy control followed this achievement, and only limited further declines in the global number of new cases reported have been achieved over the past decade. MAIN TEXT: In 2016, major stakeholders called for the development of an innovative and comprehensive leprosy strategy aimed at reducing the incidence of leprosy, lowering the burden of disability and discrimination, and interrupting transmission. This led to the establishment of the Global Partnership for Zero Leprosy (GPZL) in 2018, with partners aligned around a shared Action Framework committed to achieving the WHO targets by 2030 through national leprosy program capacity-building, resource mobilisation and an enabling research agenda. GPZL convened over 140 experts from more than 20 countries to develop a research agenda to achieve zero leprosy. The result is a detailed research agenda focusing on diagnostics, mapping, digital technology and innovation, disability, epidemiological modelling and investment case, implementation research, stigma, post exposure prophylaxis and transmission, and vaccines. This research agenda is aligned with the research priorities identified by other stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Developing and achieving consensus on the research agenda for zero leprosy is a significant step forward for the leprosy community. In a next step, research programmes must be developed, with individual components of the research agenda requiring distinct expertise, varying in resource needs, and operating over different timescales. Moving toward zero leprosy now requires partner alignment and new investments at all stages of the research process, from discovery to implementation. BioMed Central 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7658911/ /pubmed/33183339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00774-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Steinmann, Peter Dusenbury, Courtenay Addiss, David Mirza, Fareed Smith, W. Cairns S. A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy |
title | A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy |
title_full | A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy |
title_fullStr | A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy |
title_full_unstemmed | A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy |
title_short | A comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy |
title_sort | comprehensive research agenda for zero leprosy |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7658911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33183339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00774-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinmannpeter acomprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT dusenburycourtenay acomprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT addissdavid acomprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT mirzafareed acomprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT smithwcairnss acomprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT steinmannpeter comprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT dusenburycourtenay comprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT addissdavid comprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT mirzafareed comprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy AT smithwcairnss comprehensiveresearchagendaforzeroleprosy |