Cargando…
Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes
BACKGROUND: To identify different response patterns to intravitreal dexamethasone implants (IDI) in naïve and previously treated (PT) diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes in a real-life setting. METHODS: 342 IDI injections (203 DME eyes) were included. Number of IDI injections, percentage (%) of eyes w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01716-2 |
_version_ | 1783608809416032256 |
---|---|
author | Zarranz-Ventura, Javier Romero-Núñez, Barbara Bernal-Morales, Carolina Velazquez-Villoria, Daniel Sala-Puigdollers, Anna Figueras-Roca, Marc Copete, Sergio Distefano, Laura Boixadera, Anna García-Arumi, Jose Adan, Alfredo |
author_facet | Zarranz-Ventura, Javier Romero-Núñez, Barbara Bernal-Morales, Carolina Velazquez-Villoria, Daniel Sala-Puigdollers, Anna Figueras-Roca, Marc Copete, Sergio Distefano, Laura Boixadera, Anna García-Arumi, Jose Adan, Alfredo |
author_sort | Zarranz-Ventura, Javier |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To identify different response patterns to intravitreal dexamethasone implants (IDI) in naïve and previously treated (PT) diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes in a real-life setting. METHODS: 342 IDI injections (203 DME eyes) were included. Number of IDI injections, percentage (%) of eyes with 1, 2, 3 and ≥ 4 injections, time to reinjections, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were evaluated for naïve and PT DME eyes over 24 months. RESULTS: Mean number of injections was significantly lower in naïve vs PT DME eyes (1.40 ± 0.9 vs 1.82 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes receiving 1 injection was significantly higher in naïve vs PT DME eyes (76.1 vs 47.7), (p < 0.001). However, it was significantly lower for 2 (16.4 vs 29.4), or 3 injections (1.4 vs 17.6) (both p < 0.001), with no differences in eyes receiving ≥4 injections (5.9 vs 5.1 respectively, p = 0.80). Mean time to reinjection was not significantly different between both groups for the second, third and fourth injection (9.6 ± 4.0 vs 10.0 ± 5.5, p = 0.75, 13.2 ± 4.0 vs 16.0 ± 3.5, p = 0.21 and 21.7 ± 3.8 vs 19.7 ± 5.8, p = 0.55). VA scores were consistently better in naïve vs PT DME eyes at all studied timepoints, with no significant differences in CRT reduction or adverse effect rates. CONCLUSION: Naïve DME eyes received lower number of IDI injections and showed better VA levels than PT DME eyes for 24 months in a real-world setting. This data supports the IDI use in early DME stages and provide further evidence of better IDI response when used as first-line therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7659223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76592232020-11-13 Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes Zarranz-Ventura, Javier Romero-Núñez, Barbara Bernal-Morales, Carolina Velazquez-Villoria, Daniel Sala-Puigdollers, Anna Figueras-Roca, Marc Copete, Sergio Distefano, Laura Boixadera, Anna García-Arumi, Jose Adan, Alfredo BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To identify different response patterns to intravitreal dexamethasone implants (IDI) in naïve and previously treated (PT) diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes in a real-life setting. METHODS: 342 IDI injections (203 DME eyes) were included. Number of IDI injections, percentage (%) of eyes with 1, 2, 3 and ≥ 4 injections, time to reinjections, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were evaluated for naïve and PT DME eyes over 24 months. RESULTS: Mean number of injections was significantly lower in naïve vs PT DME eyes (1.40 ± 0.9 vs 1.82 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes receiving 1 injection was significantly higher in naïve vs PT DME eyes (76.1 vs 47.7), (p < 0.001). However, it was significantly lower for 2 (16.4 vs 29.4), or 3 injections (1.4 vs 17.6) (both p < 0.001), with no differences in eyes receiving ≥4 injections (5.9 vs 5.1 respectively, p = 0.80). Mean time to reinjection was not significantly different between both groups for the second, third and fourth injection (9.6 ± 4.0 vs 10.0 ± 5.5, p = 0.75, 13.2 ± 4.0 vs 16.0 ± 3.5, p = 0.21 and 21.7 ± 3.8 vs 19.7 ± 5.8, p = 0.55). VA scores were consistently better in naïve vs PT DME eyes at all studied timepoints, with no significant differences in CRT reduction or adverse effect rates. CONCLUSION: Naïve DME eyes received lower number of IDI injections and showed better VA levels than PT DME eyes for 24 months in a real-world setting. This data supports the IDI use in early DME stages and provide further evidence of better IDI response when used as first-line therapy. BioMed Central 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7659223/ /pubmed/33176749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01716-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zarranz-Ventura, Javier Romero-Núñez, Barbara Bernal-Morales, Carolina Velazquez-Villoria, Daniel Sala-Puigdollers, Anna Figueras-Roca, Marc Copete, Sergio Distefano, Laura Boixadera, Anna García-Arumi, Jose Adan, Alfredo Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes |
title | Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes |
title_full | Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes |
title_fullStr | Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes |
title_short | Differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes |
title_sort | differential response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated diabetic macular edema eyes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01716-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zarranzventurajavier differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT romeronunezbarbara differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT bernalmoralescarolina differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT velazquezvilloriadaniel differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT salapuigdollersanna differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT figuerasrocamarc differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT copetesergio differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT distefanolaura differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT boixaderaanna differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT garciaarumijose differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT adanalfredo differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes AT differentialresponsetointravitrealdexamethasoneimplantinnaiveandpreviouslytreateddiabeticmacularedemaeyes |