Cargando…
Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit
INTRODUCTION: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in arthroplasty surgery has led to a reduction in postoperative length of stay in recent years. Patients with prolonged length of stay (PLOS) add to the burden of a strained NHS. Our aim was to identify the main reasons. METHODS: A PLO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.18.BJO-2020-0047.R1 |
_version_ | 1783608850288476160 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Hean Wu Bryce, Leeann Cassidy, Roslyn Hill, Janet Catherine Diamond, Owen Beverland, David |
author_facet | Kang, Hean Wu Bryce, Leeann Cassidy, Roslyn Hill, Janet Catherine Diamond, Owen Beverland, David |
author_sort | Kang, Hean Wu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in arthroplasty surgery has led to a reduction in postoperative length of stay in recent years. Patients with prolonged length of stay (PLOS) add to the burden of a strained NHS. Our aim was to identify the main reasons. METHODS: A PLOS was arbitrarily defined as an inpatient hospital stay of four days or longer from admission date. A total of 2,000 consecutive arthroplasty patients between September 2017 and July 2018 were reviewed. Of these, 1,878 patients were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Notes for 524 PLOS patients were audited to determine predominant reasons for PLOS. RESULTS: The mean total length of stay was 4 days (1 to 42). The top three reasons for PLOS were social services, day-before-surgery admission, and slow to mobilize. Social services accounted for 1,224 excess bed days, almost half (49.2%, 1,224/2,489) of the sum of excess bed days. CONCLUSION: A preadmission discharge plan, plus day of surgery admission and mobilization on the day of surgery, would have the potential to significantly reduce length of stay without compromising patient care. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:488–493. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7659636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76596362020-11-18 Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit Kang, Hean Wu Bryce, Leeann Cassidy, Roslyn Hill, Janet Catherine Diamond, Owen Beverland, David Bone Jt Open Arthroplasty INTRODUCTION: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in arthroplasty surgery has led to a reduction in postoperative length of stay in recent years. Patients with prolonged length of stay (PLOS) add to the burden of a strained NHS. Our aim was to identify the main reasons. METHODS: A PLOS was arbitrarily defined as an inpatient hospital stay of four days or longer from admission date. A total of 2,000 consecutive arthroplasty patients between September 2017 and July 2018 were reviewed. Of these, 1,878 patients were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Notes for 524 PLOS patients were audited to determine predominant reasons for PLOS. RESULTS: The mean total length of stay was 4 days (1 to 42). The top three reasons for PLOS were social services, day-before-surgery admission, and slow to mobilize. Social services accounted for 1,224 excess bed days, almost half (49.2%, 1,224/2,489) of the sum of excess bed days. CONCLUSION: A preadmission discharge plan, plus day of surgery admission and mobilization on the day of surgery, would have the potential to significantly reduce length of stay without compromising patient care. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:488–493. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7659636/ /pubmed/33215143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.18.BJO-2020-0047.R1 Text en © 2020 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Arthroplasty Kang, Hean Wu Bryce, Leeann Cassidy, Roslyn Hill, Janet Catherine Diamond, Owen Beverland, David Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit |
title | Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit |
title_full | Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit |
title_fullStr | Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit |
title_short | Prolonged length of stay (PLOS) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit |
title_sort | prolonged length of stay (plos) in a high-volume arthroplasty unit |
topic | Arthroplasty |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.18.BJO-2020-0047.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangheanwu prolongedlengthofstayplosinahighvolumearthroplastyunit AT bryceleeann prolongedlengthofstayplosinahighvolumearthroplastyunit AT cassidyroslyn prolongedlengthofstayplosinahighvolumearthroplastyunit AT hilljanetcatherine prolongedlengthofstayplosinahighvolumearthroplastyunit AT diamondowen prolongedlengthofstayplosinahighvolumearthroplastyunit AT beverlanddavid prolongedlengthofstayplosinahighvolumearthroplastyunit |