Cargando…

Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies

Individual animals experience different costs and benefits associated with group living, which may impact on their foraging efficiency in ways not yet well specified. This study investigated associations between social dominance, body condition and interruptions to foraging behaviour in a cross-sect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Sarah L., Harris, Pat, Rands, Sean A., Nicol, Christine J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240636
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10305
_version_ 1783608853438398464
author Giles, Sarah L.
Harris, Pat
Rands, Sean A.
Nicol, Christine J.
author_facet Giles, Sarah L.
Harris, Pat
Rands, Sean A.
Nicol, Christine J.
author_sort Giles, Sarah L.
collection PubMed
description Individual animals experience different costs and benefits associated with group living, which may impact on their foraging efficiency in ways not yet well specified. This study investigated associations between social dominance, body condition and interruptions to foraging behaviour in a cross-sectional study of 116 domestic horses and ponies, kept in 20 discrete herds. Social dominance was measured for each individual alongside observations of winter foraging behaviour. During bouts of foraging, the duration, frequency and category (vigilance, movement, social displacements given and received, scratching and startle responses) of interruptions were recorded, with total interruption time taken as a proxy measure of foraging efficiency. Total foraging time was not influenced by body condition or social dominance. Body condition was associated with social dominance, but more strongly associated with foraging efficiency. Specifically, lower body condition was associated with greater vigilance. This demonstrates that factors other than social dominance can result in stable differences in winter body condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7659649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76596492020-11-24 Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies Giles, Sarah L. Harris, Pat Rands, Sean A. Nicol, Christine J. PeerJ Animal Behavior Individual animals experience different costs and benefits associated with group living, which may impact on their foraging efficiency in ways not yet well specified. This study investigated associations between social dominance, body condition and interruptions to foraging behaviour in a cross-sectional study of 116 domestic horses and ponies, kept in 20 discrete herds. Social dominance was measured for each individual alongside observations of winter foraging behaviour. During bouts of foraging, the duration, frequency and category (vigilance, movement, social displacements given and received, scratching and startle responses) of interruptions were recorded, with total interruption time taken as a proxy measure of foraging efficiency. Total foraging time was not influenced by body condition or social dominance. Body condition was associated with social dominance, but more strongly associated with foraging efficiency. Specifically, lower body condition was associated with greater vigilance. This demonstrates that factors other than social dominance can result in stable differences in winter body condition. PeerJ Inc. 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7659649/ /pubmed/33240636 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10305 Text en © 2020 Giles et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Giles, Sarah L.
Harris, Pat
Rands, Sean A.
Nicol, Christine J.
Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
title Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
title_full Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
title_fullStr Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
title_full_unstemmed Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
title_short Foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
title_sort foraging efficiency, social status and body condition in group-living horses and ponies
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240636
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10305
work_keys_str_mv AT gilessarahl foragingefficiencysocialstatusandbodyconditioningrouplivinghorsesandponies
AT harrispat foragingefficiencysocialstatusandbodyconditioningrouplivinghorsesandponies
AT randsseana foragingefficiencysocialstatusandbodyconditioningrouplivinghorsesandponies
AT nicolchristinej foragingefficiencysocialstatusandbodyconditioningrouplivinghorsesandponies