Cargando…
Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed thro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0093.R1 |
_version_ | 1783608864838516736 |
---|---|
author | Sonntag, Jesper Landale, Keith Brorson, Stig Harris, Ian A |
author_facet | Sonntag, Jesper Landale, Keith Brorson, Stig Harris, Ian A |
author_sort | Sonntag, Jesper |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year. RESULTS: Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, six of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle. CONCLUSION: The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:549–555. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7659699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76596992020-11-18 Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? Sonntag, Jesper Landale, Keith Brorson, Stig Harris, Ian A Bone Jt Open General Orthopaedics AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year. RESULTS: Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, six of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle. CONCLUSION: The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:549–555. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7659699/ /pubmed/33215153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0093.R1 Text en © 2020 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General Orthopaedics Sonntag, Jesper Landale, Keith Brorson, Stig Harris, Ian A Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? |
title | Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? |
title_full | Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? |
title_fullStr | Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? |
title_short | Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? |
title_sort | can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? |
topic | General Orthopaedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0093.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonntagjesper cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons AT landalekeith cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons AT brorsonstig cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons AT harrisiana cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons |