Cargando…

Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed thro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonntag, Jesper, Landale, Keith, Brorson, Stig, Harris, Ian A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0093.R1
_version_ 1783608864838516736
author Sonntag, Jesper
Landale, Keith
Brorson, Stig
Harris, Ian A
author_facet Sonntag, Jesper
Landale, Keith
Brorson, Stig
Harris, Ian A
author_sort Sonntag, Jesper
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year. RESULTS: Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, six of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle. CONCLUSION: The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:549–555.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7659699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76596992020-11-18 Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons? Sonntag, Jesper Landale, Keith Brorson, Stig Harris, Ian A Bone Jt Open General Orthopaedics AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year. RESULTS: Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, six of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle. CONCLUSION: The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:549–555. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7659699/ /pubmed/33215153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0093.R1 Text en © 2020 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle General Orthopaedics
Sonntag, Jesper
Landale, Keith
Brorson, Stig
Harris, Ian A
Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
title Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
title_full Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
title_fullStr Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
title_full_unstemmed Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
title_short Can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
title_sort can the results of a randomized controlled trial change the treatment preferences of orthopaedic surgeons?
topic General Orthopaedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0093.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT sonntagjesper cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons
AT landalekeith cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons
AT brorsonstig cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons
AT harrisiana cantheresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialchangethetreatmentpreferencesoforthopaedicsurgeons