Cargando…

The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the need for hand trauma services during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, specifically related to surgical requirements. This will provide useful information for planning and resource allocation in the event of any further lockdown. METHODS: A prospective a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atia, Fady, Pocnetz, Sasa, Selby, Anna, Russell, Peter, Bainbridge, Chris, Johnson, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.110.BJO-2020-0133.R1
_version_ 1783608865553645568
author Atia, Fady
Pocnetz, Sasa
Selby, Anna
Russell, Peter
Bainbridge, Chris
Johnson, Nick
author_facet Atia, Fady
Pocnetz, Sasa
Selby, Anna
Russell, Peter
Bainbridge, Chris
Johnson, Nick
author_sort Atia, Fady
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the need for hand trauma services during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, specifically related to surgical requirements. This will provide useful information for planning and resource allocation in the event of any further lockdown. METHODS: A prospective analsysis of all patients attending our hand trauma unit throughout the UK COVID-19 lockdown period (24 March to 10 May 2020) was carried out. Prospectively collected departmental data from the same period in 2019 was obtained and reviewed for comparison. The number of patients attending clinic, undergoing surgery, the type of surgical procedure, and rate of surgery was compared. RESULTS: In all, 463 patients attended hand trauma services during the lockdown period compared to 793 in 2019 (32% reduction); 190 surgical procedures were carried out during lockdown compared to 236 in 2019 (20% reduction). Intervention rate was higher during the lockdown period (41% compared to 30%). There was no difference in the type of cases. In the first half of lockdown, 47% fewer procedures were performed than in 2019, but in the second half of lockdown 13% more procedures were carried out than the same period in 2019. CONCLUSION: Requirements for hand trauma surgery remain high during a pandemic lockdown. Attendances and surgical requirements can be expected to steadily return to normal levels during a prolonged lockdown period. Throughout any future lockdown period adequate surgical provision must be maintained for patients with hand injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:639–643.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7659702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76597022020-11-18 The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization Atia, Fady Pocnetz, Sasa Selby, Anna Russell, Peter Bainbridge, Chris Johnson, Nick Bone Jt Open Wrist & Hand AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the need for hand trauma services during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, specifically related to surgical requirements. This will provide useful information for planning and resource allocation in the event of any further lockdown. METHODS: A prospective analsysis of all patients attending our hand trauma unit throughout the UK COVID-19 lockdown period (24 March to 10 May 2020) was carried out. Prospectively collected departmental data from the same period in 2019 was obtained and reviewed for comparison. The number of patients attending clinic, undergoing surgery, the type of surgical procedure, and rate of surgery was compared. RESULTS: In all, 463 patients attended hand trauma services during the lockdown period compared to 793 in 2019 (32% reduction); 190 surgical procedures were carried out during lockdown compared to 236 in 2019 (20% reduction). Intervention rate was higher during the lockdown period (41% compared to 30%). There was no difference in the type of cases. In the first half of lockdown, 47% fewer procedures were performed than in 2019, but in the second half of lockdown 13% more procedures were carried out than the same period in 2019. CONCLUSION: Requirements for hand trauma surgery remain high during a pandemic lockdown. Attendances and surgical requirements can be expected to steadily return to normal levels during a prolonged lockdown period. Throughout any future lockdown period adequate surgical provision must be maintained for patients with hand injuries. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:639–643. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2020-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7659702/ /pubmed/33215095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.110.BJO-2020-0133.R1 Text en © 2020 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Wrist & Hand
Atia, Fady
Pocnetz, Sasa
Selby, Anna
Russell, Peter
Bainbridge, Chris
Johnson, Nick
The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization
title The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization
title_full The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization
title_fullStr The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization
title_full_unstemmed The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization
title_short The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization
title_sort effect of the covid-19 lockdown on hand trauma surgery utilization
topic Wrist & Hand
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7659702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.110.BJO-2020-0133.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT atiafady theeffectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT pocnetzsasa theeffectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT selbyanna theeffectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT russellpeter theeffectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT bainbridgechris theeffectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT johnsonnick theeffectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT atiafady effectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT pocnetzsasa effectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT selbyanna effectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT russellpeter effectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT bainbridgechris effectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization
AT johnsonnick effectofthecovid19lockdownonhandtraumasurgeryutilization