Cargando…

Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use

INTRODUCTION: At the population level, screening and brief intervention (BI) is the most cost-effective method to reduce the burden of disease due to hazardous alcohol use. In delivering BI at individual level, trained workforce as well as time is a limiting factor. Hence, a study was conducted to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baby, Sojan, Singh, Harpreet, Singh, Ranveer, Dixit, Siddharth, Chail, Amit, Dubey, Amresh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223725
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_95_20
_version_ 1783608917741273088
author Baby, Sojan
Singh, Harpreet
Singh, Ranveer
Dixit, Siddharth
Chail, Amit
Dubey, Amresh
author_facet Baby, Sojan
Singh, Harpreet
Singh, Ranveer
Dixit, Siddharth
Chail, Amit
Dubey, Amresh
author_sort Baby, Sojan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: At the population level, screening and brief intervention (BI) is the most cost-effective method to reduce the burden of disease due to hazardous alcohol use. In delivering BI at individual level, trained workforce as well as time is a limiting factor. Hence, a study was conducted to assess the outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at workplace in a group setting for the participants identified with hazardous alcohol use pattern, as a secondary prevention measure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was a pre- and post-intervention study without a control group. Following an educational lecture, conducted by a mental health team including a psychiatrist, participants were screened using the WHO ASSIST questionnaire, V3.0 version. Those screened positive for hazardous alcohol use were given “modified brief intervention” in a group setting at their workplace which consisted of two semi-structured sessions of 1-h duration each. The sessions were spaced in a month. First session was based on motivation enhancement measures along with gathering of current alcohol use details and second session focused on relapse prevention. Three months later, the outcomes were assessed using a semistructured questionnaire and ASSIST was reapplied. The analysis was done using the R-commander from R-software. RESULTS: No significant difficulty was experienced in conducting the interventions. Fifty (55.6%) participants stayed alcohol abstinent following second session and another 22 (24.44%) had reduced both the quantity and frequency of use. Paired t-tests revealed statistically significant reduction in all secondary outcome parameters (ASSIST scores, usual dose in one sitting, maximum dose, and number of days of use in month). Eighty (88.89%) participants reported the program to be effective. Only 3 months of observation is a limitation. CONCLUSION: The study provides an efficient secondary prevention model to reduce hazardous drinking at the population level needing less workforce, cost, and time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7660012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76600122020-11-19 Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use Baby, Sojan Singh, Harpreet Singh, Ranveer Dixit, Siddharth Chail, Amit Dubey, Amresh Ind Psychiatry J Original Article INTRODUCTION: At the population level, screening and brief intervention (BI) is the most cost-effective method to reduce the burden of disease due to hazardous alcohol use. In delivering BI at individual level, trained workforce as well as time is a limiting factor. Hence, a study was conducted to assess the outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at workplace in a group setting for the participants identified with hazardous alcohol use pattern, as a secondary prevention measure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was a pre- and post-intervention study without a control group. Following an educational lecture, conducted by a mental health team including a psychiatrist, participants were screened using the WHO ASSIST questionnaire, V3.0 version. Those screened positive for hazardous alcohol use were given “modified brief intervention” in a group setting at their workplace which consisted of two semi-structured sessions of 1-h duration each. The sessions were spaced in a month. First session was based on motivation enhancement measures along with gathering of current alcohol use details and second session focused on relapse prevention. Three months later, the outcomes were assessed using a semistructured questionnaire and ASSIST was reapplied. The analysis was done using the R-commander from R-software. RESULTS: No significant difficulty was experienced in conducting the interventions. Fifty (55.6%) participants stayed alcohol abstinent following second session and another 22 (24.44%) had reduced both the quantity and frequency of use. Paired t-tests revealed statistically significant reduction in all secondary outcome parameters (ASSIST scores, usual dose in one sitting, maximum dose, and number of days of use in month). Eighty (88.89%) participants reported the program to be effective. Only 3 months of observation is a limitation. CONCLUSION: The study provides an efficient secondary prevention model to reduce hazardous drinking at the population level needing less workforce, cost, and time. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7660012/ /pubmed/33223725 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_95_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Industrial Psychiatry Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Baby, Sojan
Singh, Harpreet
Singh, Ranveer
Dixit, Siddharth
Chail, Amit
Dubey, Amresh
Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use
title Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use
title_full Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use
title_fullStr Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use
title_short Outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use
title_sort outcome of a “modified brief intervention” program delivered at work place for a population with hazardous alcohol use
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223725
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_95_20
work_keys_str_mv AT babysojan outcomeofamodifiedbriefinterventionprogramdeliveredatworkplaceforapopulationwithhazardousalcoholuse
AT singhharpreet outcomeofamodifiedbriefinterventionprogramdeliveredatworkplaceforapopulationwithhazardousalcoholuse
AT singhranveer outcomeofamodifiedbriefinterventionprogramdeliveredatworkplaceforapopulationwithhazardousalcoholuse
AT dixitsiddharth outcomeofamodifiedbriefinterventionprogramdeliveredatworkplaceforapopulationwithhazardousalcoholuse
AT chailamit outcomeofamodifiedbriefinterventionprogramdeliveredatworkplaceforapopulationwithhazardousalcoholuse
AT dubeyamresh outcomeofamodifiedbriefinterventionprogramdeliveredatworkplaceforapopulationwithhazardousalcoholuse