Cargando…

Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands

Metagenomic methods enable the simultaneous characterization of microbial communities without time-consuming and bias-inducing culturing. Metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) binning methods aim to reassemble individual genomes from this data. However, the recovery of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maguire, Finlay, Jia, Baofeng, Gray, Kristen L., Lau, Wing Yin Venus, Beiko, Robert G., Brinkman, Fiona S. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Microbiology Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33001022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000436
_version_ 1783608974551023616
author Maguire, Finlay
Jia, Baofeng
Gray, Kristen L.
Lau, Wing Yin Venus
Beiko, Robert G.
Brinkman, Fiona S. L.
author_facet Maguire, Finlay
Jia, Baofeng
Gray, Kristen L.
Lau, Wing Yin Venus
Beiko, Robert G.
Brinkman, Fiona S. L.
author_sort Maguire, Finlay
collection PubMed
description Metagenomic methods enable the simultaneous characterization of microbial communities without time-consuming and bias-inducing culturing. Metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) binning methods aim to reassemble individual genomes from this data. However, the recovery of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as plasmids and genomic islands (GIs), by binning has not been well characterized. Given the association of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes and virulence factor (VF) genes with MGEs, studying their transmission is a public-health priority. The variable copy number and sequence composition of MGEs makes them potentially problematic for MAG binning methods. To systematically investigate this issue, we simulated a low-complexity metagenome comprising 30 GI-rich and plasmid-containing bacterial genomes. MAGs were then recovered using 12 current prediction pipelines and evaluated. While 82–94 % of chromosomes could be correctly recovered and binned, only 38–44 % of GIs and 1–29 % of plasmid sequences were found. Strikingly, no plasmid-borne VF nor AMR genes were recovered, and only 0–45 % of AMR or VF genes within GIs. We conclude that short-read MAG approaches, without further optimization, are largely ineffective for the analysis of mobile genes, including those of public-health importance, such as AMR and VF genes. We propose that researchers should explore developing methods that optimize for this issue and consider also using unassembled short reads and/or long-read approaches to more fully characterize metagenomic data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7660262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Microbiology Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76602622020-11-13 Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands Maguire, Finlay Jia, Baofeng Gray, Kristen L. Lau, Wing Yin Venus Beiko, Robert G. Brinkman, Fiona S. L. Microb Genom Research Article Metagenomic methods enable the simultaneous characterization of microbial communities without time-consuming and bias-inducing culturing. Metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) binning methods aim to reassemble individual genomes from this data. However, the recovery of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as plasmids and genomic islands (GIs), by binning has not been well characterized. Given the association of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes and virulence factor (VF) genes with MGEs, studying their transmission is a public-health priority. The variable copy number and sequence composition of MGEs makes them potentially problematic for MAG binning methods. To systematically investigate this issue, we simulated a low-complexity metagenome comprising 30 GI-rich and plasmid-containing bacterial genomes. MAGs were then recovered using 12 current prediction pipelines and evaluated. While 82–94 % of chromosomes could be correctly recovered and binned, only 38–44 % of GIs and 1–29 % of plasmid sequences were found. Strikingly, no plasmid-borne VF nor AMR genes were recovered, and only 0–45 % of AMR or VF genes within GIs. We conclude that short-read MAG approaches, without further optimization, are largely ineffective for the analysis of mobile genes, including those of public-health importance, such as AMR and VF genes. We propose that researchers should explore developing methods that optimize for this issue and consider also using unassembled short reads and/or long-read approaches to more fully characterize metagenomic data. Microbiology Society 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7660262/ /pubmed/33001022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000436 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maguire, Finlay
Jia, Baofeng
Gray, Kristen L.
Lau, Wing Yin Venus
Beiko, Robert G.
Brinkman, Fiona S. L.
Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands
title Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands
title_full Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands
title_fullStr Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands
title_full_unstemmed Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands
title_short Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands
title_sort metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic islands
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33001022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000436
work_keys_str_mv AT maguirefinlay metagenomeassembledgenomebinningmethodswithshortreadsdisproportionatelyfailforplasmidsandgenomicislands
AT jiabaofeng metagenomeassembledgenomebinningmethodswithshortreadsdisproportionatelyfailforplasmidsandgenomicislands
AT graykristenl metagenomeassembledgenomebinningmethodswithshortreadsdisproportionatelyfailforplasmidsandgenomicislands
AT lauwingyinvenus metagenomeassembledgenomebinningmethodswithshortreadsdisproportionatelyfailforplasmidsandgenomicislands
AT beikorobertg metagenomeassembledgenomebinningmethodswithshortreadsdisproportionatelyfailforplasmidsandgenomicislands
AT brinkmanfionasl metagenomeassembledgenomebinningmethodswithshortreadsdisproportionatelyfailforplasmidsandgenomicislands