Cargando…
Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils
In electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), coil resistance is an important factor in the generation of heat energy used to change e-liquid into vapor. An accurate and unbiased method for testing coil resistance is vital for understanding its effect on emissions and reporting results that are co...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33114291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217779 |
_version_ | 1783609050236190720 |
---|---|
author | Saleh, Qutaiba M. Hensel, Edward C. Robinson, Risa J. |
author_facet | Saleh, Qutaiba M. Hensel, Edward C. Robinson, Risa J. |
author_sort | Saleh, Qutaiba M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), coil resistance is an important factor in the generation of heat energy used to change e-liquid into vapor. An accurate and unbiased method for testing coil resistance is vital for understanding its effect on emissions and reporting results that are comparable across different types and brands of ENDS and measured in different laboratories. This study proposes a robust, accurate and unbiased method for measuring coil resistance. An apparatus is used which mimics the geometric configuration and assembly of ENDS reservoirs, coils and power control units. The method is demonstrated on two commonly used ENDS devices—the ALTO by Vuse and JUUL. Analysis shows that the proposed method is stable and reliable. The two-wire configuration introduced a positive measurement bias of 0.086 (Ω), which is a significant error for sub-ohm coil designs. The four-wire configuration is far less prone to bias error and is recommended for universal adoption. We observed a significant difference in the coil resistance of 0.593 (Ω) (p < 0.001) between the two products tested. The mean resistance and standard deviation of the reservoir/coil assemblies was shown to be 1.031 (0.067) (Ω) for ALTO and 1.624 (0.033) (Ω) for JUUL. The variation in coil resistance between products and within products can have significant impacts on aerosol emissions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7660654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76606542020-11-13 Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils Saleh, Qutaiba M. Hensel, Edward C. Robinson, Risa J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), coil resistance is an important factor in the generation of heat energy used to change e-liquid into vapor. An accurate and unbiased method for testing coil resistance is vital for understanding its effect on emissions and reporting results that are comparable across different types and brands of ENDS and measured in different laboratories. This study proposes a robust, accurate and unbiased method for measuring coil resistance. An apparatus is used which mimics the geometric configuration and assembly of ENDS reservoirs, coils and power control units. The method is demonstrated on two commonly used ENDS devices—the ALTO by Vuse and JUUL. Analysis shows that the proposed method is stable and reliable. The two-wire configuration introduced a positive measurement bias of 0.086 (Ω), which is a significant error for sub-ohm coil designs. The four-wire configuration is far less prone to bias error and is recommended for universal adoption. We observed a significant difference in the coil resistance of 0.593 (Ω) (p < 0.001) between the two products tested. The mean resistance and standard deviation of the reservoir/coil assemblies was shown to be 1.031 (0.067) (Ω) for ALTO and 1.624 (0.033) (Ω) for JUUL. The variation in coil resistance between products and within products can have significant impacts on aerosol emissions. MDPI 2020-10-24 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7660654/ /pubmed/33114291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217779 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Saleh, Qutaiba M. Hensel, Edward C. Robinson, Risa J. Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils |
title | Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils |
title_full | Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils |
title_fullStr | Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils |
title_full_unstemmed | Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils |
title_short | Method for Quantifying Variation in the Resistance of Electronic Cigarette Coils |
title_sort | method for quantifying variation in the resistance of electronic cigarette coils |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33114291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salehqutaibam methodforquantifyingvariationintheresistanceofelectroniccigarettecoils AT henseledwardc methodforquantifyingvariationintheresistanceofelectroniccigarettecoils AT robinsonrisaj methodforquantifyingvariationintheresistanceofelectroniccigarettecoils |