Cargando…

Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of cardiac output is critical to the diagnosis and management of various cardiac disease states; however, clinical standards of direct Fick and thermodilution are invasive. Noninvasive alternatives, such as closed‐circuit acetylene (C(2)H(2)) rebreathing, warrant vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardin, E. Ashley, Stoller, Douglas, Lawley, Justin, Howden, Erin J., Hieda, Michinari, Pawelczyk, James, Jarvis, Sara, Prisk, Kim, Sarma, Satyam, Levine, Benjamin D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32851906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.015794
_version_ 1783609078587588608
author Hardin, E. Ashley
Stoller, Douglas
Lawley, Justin
Howden, Erin J.
Hieda, Michinari
Pawelczyk, James
Jarvis, Sara
Prisk, Kim
Sarma, Satyam
Levine, Benjamin D.
author_facet Hardin, E. Ashley
Stoller, Douglas
Lawley, Justin
Howden, Erin J.
Hieda, Michinari
Pawelczyk, James
Jarvis, Sara
Prisk, Kim
Sarma, Satyam
Levine, Benjamin D.
author_sort Hardin, E. Ashley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of cardiac output is critical to the diagnosis and management of various cardiac disease states; however, clinical standards of direct Fick and thermodilution are invasive. Noninvasive alternatives, such as closed‐circuit acetylene (C(2)H(2)) rebreathing, warrant validation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 10 clinical studies and all available cardiopulmonary stress tests performed in our laboratory that included a rebreathing method and direct Fick or thermodilution. Studies included healthy individuals and patients with clinical disease. Simultaneous cardiac output measurements were obtained under normovolemic, hypovolemic, and hypervolemic conditions, along with submaximal and maximal exercise. A total of 3198 measurements in 519 patients were analyzed (mean age, 59 years; 48% women). The C(2)H(2) method was more precise than thermodilution in healthy individuals with half the typical error (TE; 0.34 L/min [r=0.92] and coefficient of variation, 7.2%) versus thermodilution (TE=0.67 [r=0.70] and coefficient of variation, 13.2%). In healthy individuals during supine rest and upright exercise, C(2)H(2) correlated well with thermodilution (supine: r=0.84, TE=1.02; exercise: r=0.82, TE=2.36). In patients with clinical disease during supine rest, C(2)H(2) correlated with thermodilution (r=0.85, TE=1.43). C(2)H(2) was similar to thermodilution and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) rebreathing technique compared with Fick in healthy adults (C(2)H(2) rest: r=0.85, TE=0.84; C(2)H(2) exercise: r=0.87, TE=2.39; thermodilution rest: r=0.72, TE=1.11; thermodilution exercise: r=0.73, TE=2.87; N(2)O rest: r=0.82, TE=0.94; N(2)O exercise: r=0.84, TE=2.18). The accuracy of the C(2)H(2) and N(2)O methods was excellent (r=0.99, TE=0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The C(2)H(2) rebreathing method is more precise than, and as accurate as, the thermodilution method in a variety of patients, with accuracy similar to an N(2)O rebreathing method approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7660774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76607742020-11-17 Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement Hardin, E. Ashley Stoller, Douglas Lawley, Justin Howden, Erin J. Hieda, Michinari Pawelczyk, James Jarvis, Sara Prisk, Kim Sarma, Satyam Levine, Benjamin D. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of cardiac output is critical to the diagnosis and management of various cardiac disease states; however, clinical standards of direct Fick and thermodilution are invasive. Noninvasive alternatives, such as closed‐circuit acetylene (C(2)H(2)) rebreathing, warrant validation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 10 clinical studies and all available cardiopulmonary stress tests performed in our laboratory that included a rebreathing method and direct Fick or thermodilution. Studies included healthy individuals and patients with clinical disease. Simultaneous cardiac output measurements were obtained under normovolemic, hypovolemic, and hypervolemic conditions, along with submaximal and maximal exercise. A total of 3198 measurements in 519 patients were analyzed (mean age, 59 years; 48% women). The C(2)H(2) method was more precise than thermodilution in healthy individuals with half the typical error (TE; 0.34 L/min [r=0.92] and coefficient of variation, 7.2%) versus thermodilution (TE=0.67 [r=0.70] and coefficient of variation, 13.2%). In healthy individuals during supine rest and upright exercise, C(2)H(2) correlated well with thermodilution (supine: r=0.84, TE=1.02; exercise: r=0.82, TE=2.36). In patients with clinical disease during supine rest, C(2)H(2) correlated with thermodilution (r=0.85, TE=1.43). C(2)H(2) was similar to thermodilution and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) rebreathing technique compared with Fick in healthy adults (C(2)H(2) rest: r=0.85, TE=0.84; C(2)H(2) exercise: r=0.87, TE=2.39; thermodilution rest: r=0.72, TE=1.11; thermodilution exercise: r=0.73, TE=2.87; N(2)O rest: r=0.82, TE=0.94; N(2)O exercise: r=0.84, TE=2.18). The accuracy of the C(2)H(2) and N(2)O methods was excellent (r=0.99, TE=0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The C(2)H(2) rebreathing method is more precise than, and as accurate as, the thermodilution method in a variety of patients, with accuracy similar to an N(2)O rebreathing method approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7660774/ /pubmed/32851906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.015794 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hardin, E. Ashley
Stoller, Douglas
Lawley, Justin
Howden, Erin J.
Hieda, Michinari
Pawelczyk, James
Jarvis, Sara
Prisk, Kim
Sarma, Satyam
Levine, Benjamin D.
Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement
title Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement
title_full Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement
title_fullStr Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement
title_short Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed‐Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement
title_sort noninvasive assessment of cardiac output: accuracy and precision of the closed‐circuit acetylene rebreathing technique for cardiac output measurement
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32851906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.015794
work_keys_str_mv AT hardineashley noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT stollerdouglas noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT lawleyjustin noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT howdenerinj noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT hiedamichinari noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT pawelczykjames noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT jarvissara noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT priskkim noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT sarmasatyam noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement
AT levinebenjamind noninvasiveassessmentofcardiacoutputaccuracyandprecisionoftheclosedcircuitacetylenerebreathingtechniqueforcardiacoutputmeasurement