Cargando…

Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction have high risk of rehospitalization or death. Despite guideline recommendations based on high‐quality evidence, a substantial proportion of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction receive suboptimal care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wirtz, Heidi S., Sheer, Richard, Honarpour, Narimon, Casebeer, Adrianne W., Simmons, Jeff D., Kurtz, Christopher E., Pasquale, Margaret K., Globe, Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32805181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015042
_version_ 1783609086112169984
author Wirtz, Heidi S.
Sheer, Richard
Honarpour, Narimon
Casebeer, Adrianne W.
Simmons, Jeff D.
Kurtz, Christopher E.
Pasquale, Margaret K.
Globe, Gary
author_facet Wirtz, Heidi S.
Sheer, Richard
Honarpour, Narimon
Casebeer, Adrianne W.
Simmons, Jeff D.
Kurtz, Christopher E.
Pasquale, Margaret K.
Globe, Gary
author_sort Wirtz, Heidi S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction have high risk of rehospitalization or death. Despite guideline recommendations based on high‐quality evidence, a substantial proportion of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction receive suboptimal care and/or do not comply with optimal care following hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective observational study identified 17 106 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with an incident HF‐related hospitalization using the Humana Medicare Advantage database (2008–2016). HF medication classes (beta‐blockers, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) received in the year after hospitalization were recorded, and categorized by treatment intensity (ie, number of concomitant medication classes received: none [23% of patients; n=3987], monotherapy [22%; n=3777], dual therapy [41%; n=7056], or triple therapy [13%; n=2286]). Compared with no medication, risk of primary outcome (composite of death or rehospitalization) was significantly reduced (hazard ratio [95% CI]) with monotherapy (0.68 [0.64–0.71]), dual therapy (0.56 [0.53–0.59]), and triple therapy (0.45 [0.41–0.50]). Nearly half (46%) of patients who received post‐discharge medication had no dose escalation. Overall, 59% of patients had follow‐up with a primary care physician within 14 days of discharge, and 23% had follow‐up with a cardiologist. CONCLUSIONS: In real‐world clinical practice, increasing treatment intensity reduced risk of death and rehospitalization among patients hospitalized for HF, though the use of guideline‐recommended dual and triple HF therapy remained low. There are opportunities to improve post‐discharge medical management for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction such as optimizing dose titration and improving post‐discharge follow‐up with providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7660806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76608062020-11-17 Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure Wirtz, Heidi S. Sheer, Richard Honarpour, Narimon Casebeer, Adrianne W. Simmons, Jeff D. Kurtz, Christopher E. Pasquale, Margaret K. Globe, Gary J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction have high risk of rehospitalization or death. Despite guideline recommendations based on high‐quality evidence, a substantial proportion of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction receive suboptimal care and/or do not comply with optimal care following hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective observational study identified 17 106 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with an incident HF‐related hospitalization using the Humana Medicare Advantage database (2008–2016). HF medication classes (beta‐blockers, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) received in the year after hospitalization were recorded, and categorized by treatment intensity (ie, number of concomitant medication classes received: none [23% of patients; n=3987], monotherapy [22%; n=3777], dual therapy [41%; n=7056], or triple therapy [13%; n=2286]). Compared with no medication, risk of primary outcome (composite of death or rehospitalization) was significantly reduced (hazard ratio [95% CI]) with monotherapy (0.68 [0.64–0.71]), dual therapy (0.56 [0.53–0.59]), and triple therapy (0.45 [0.41–0.50]). Nearly half (46%) of patients who received post‐discharge medication had no dose escalation. Overall, 59% of patients had follow‐up with a primary care physician within 14 days of discharge, and 23% had follow‐up with a cardiologist. CONCLUSIONS: In real‐world clinical practice, increasing treatment intensity reduced risk of death and rehospitalization among patients hospitalized for HF, though the use of guideline‐recommended dual and triple HF therapy remained low. There are opportunities to improve post‐discharge medical management for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction such as optimizing dose titration and improving post‐discharge follow‐up with providers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7660806/ /pubmed/32805181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015042 Text en © 2020 The Authors, Amgen Inc, and Humana Inc. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wirtz, Heidi S.
Sheer, Richard
Honarpour, Narimon
Casebeer, Adrianne W.
Simmons, Jeff D.
Kurtz, Christopher E.
Pasquale, Margaret K.
Globe, Gary
Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure
title Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure
title_full Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure
title_fullStr Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure
title_short Real‐World Analysis of Guideline‐Based Therapy After Hospitalization for Heart Failure
title_sort real‐world analysis of guideline‐based therapy after hospitalization for heart failure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32805181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015042
work_keys_str_mv AT wirtzheidis realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure
AT sheerrichard realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure
AT honarpournarimon realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure
AT casebeeradriannew realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure
AT simmonsjeffd realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure
AT kurtzchristophere realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure
AT pasqualemargaretk realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure
AT globegary realworldanalysisofguidelinebasedtherapyafterhospitalizationforheartfailure