Cargando…

Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether the microvascular dysfunction differed between culprit and non‐culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 115 prospectively recruited patients, after successful percuta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jo, Yoon‐Sung, Moon, Hyeyeon, Park, Kyungil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015507
_version_ 1783609093644091392
author Jo, Yoon‐Sung
Moon, Hyeyeon
Park, Kyungil
author_facet Jo, Yoon‐Sung
Moon, Hyeyeon
Park, Kyungil
author_sort Jo, Yoon‐Sung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether the microvascular dysfunction differed between culprit and non‐culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 115 prospectively recruited patients, after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, culprit and non‐culprit intracoronary hemodynamic measurements were performed and repeated at 6‐month follow‐up. (13)N‐ammonia positron emission tomography was performed at 6‐month follow‐up visit to determine absolute myocardial blood flow. The resistance values of each vessel were calculated using the coronary pressure data and the myocardial blood flow values obtained from (13)N‐ammonia positron emission tomography data. We compared the measurements between culprit and non‐culprit vessels and assessed changes in microvascular dysfunction during the study period. In 334 vessels (115 culprit and 219 non‐culprit), the culprit vessel group showed a lower fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve than the non‐culprit vessel group at baseline and 6‐month follow‐up, respectively. The value of index of microcirculatory resistance was different between the 2 groups in the baseline but not at 6‐month follow‐up. The microvascular resistance at rest and hyperemic microvascular resistance were not different between the 2 groups, but resistance to stenosis was higher in the culprit vessel group, under both resting and hyperemic status (P=0.02 and P<0.01, respectively). In the culprit vessel analysis, the fractional flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance decreased whereas coronary flow reserve increased (P<0.01 for all) at 6‐month follow‐up. However, there was no change in index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and fractional flow reserve from baseline to 6‐month follow‐up in the non‐culprit vessel analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The observed microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome is limited to the culprit vessel territory in the acute phase, which is relatively recovered in the chronic phase and there is no out‐of‐culprit territory involvement. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04169516.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7660838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76608382020-11-17 Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Jo, Yoon‐Sung Moon, Hyeyeon Park, Kyungil J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether the microvascular dysfunction differed between culprit and non‐culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 115 prospectively recruited patients, after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, culprit and non‐culprit intracoronary hemodynamic measurements were performed and repeated at 6‐month follow‐up. (13)N‐ammonia positron emission tomography was performed at 6‐month follow‐up visit to determine absolute myocardial blood flow. The resistance values of each vessel were calculated using the coronary pressure data and the myocardial blood flow values obtained from (13)N‐ammonia positron emission tomography data. We compared the measurements between culprit and non‐culprit vessels and assessed changes in microvascular dysfunction during the study period. In 334 vessels (115 culprit and 219 non‐culprit), the culprit vessel group showed a lower fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve than the non‐culprit vessel group at baseline and 6‐month follow‐up, respectively. The value of index of microcirculatory resistance was different between the 2 groups in the baseline but not at 6‐month follow‐up. The microvascular resistance at rest and hyperemic microvascular resistance were not different between the 2 groups, but resistance to stenosis was higher in the culprit vessel group, under both resting and hyperemic status (P=0.02 and P<0.01, respectively). In the culprit vessel analysis, the fractional flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance decreased whereas coronary flow reserve increased (P<0.01 for all) at 6‐month follow‐up. However, there was no change in index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and fractional flow reserve from baseline to 6‐month follow‐up in the non‐culprit vessel analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The observed microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome is limited to the culprit vessel territory in the acute phase, which is relatively recovered in the chronic phase and there is no out‐of‐culprit territory involvement. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04169516. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7660838/ /pubmed/32410526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015507 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jo, Yoon‐Sung
Moon, Hyeyeon
Park, Kyungil
Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_fullStr Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_short Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non‐Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_sort different microcirculation response between culprit and non‐culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015507
work_keys_str_mv AT joyoonsung differentmicrocirculationresponsebetweenculpritandnonculpritvesselsinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT moonhyeyeon differentmicrocirculationresponsebetweenculpritandnonculpritvesselsinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT parkkyungil differentmicrocirculationresponsebetweenculpritandnonculpritvesselsinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome