Cargando…
Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries
BACKGROUND: The internet is now the first line source of health information for many people worldwide. In the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, health information is being produced, revised, updated and disseminated at an increasingly rapid rate. The general public are fac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33183297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5 |
_version_ | 1783609141151924224 |
---|---|
author | Worrall, Amy P. Connolly, Mary J. O’Neill, Aine O’Doherty, Murray Thornton, Kenneth P. McNally, Cora McConkey, Samuel J. de Barra, Eoghan |
author_facet | Worrall, Amy P. Connolly, Mary J. O’Neill, Aine O’Doherty, Murray Thornton, Kenneth P. McNally, Cora McConkey, Samuel J. de Barra, Eoghan |
author_sort | Worrall, Amy P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The internet is now the first line source of health information for many people worldwide. In the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, health information is being produced, revised, updated and disseminated at an increasingly rapid rate. The general public are faced with a plethora of misinformation regarding COVID-19 and the readability of online information has an impact on their understanding of the disease. The accessibility of online healthcare information relating to COVID-19 is unknown. We sought to evaluate the readability of online information relating to COVID-19 in four English speaking regions: Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, and compare readability of website source provenance and regional origin. METHODS: The Google® search engine was used to collate the first 20 webpage URLs for three individual searches for ‘COVID’, ‘COVID-19’, and ‘coronavirus’ from Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG) Score, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) score were calculated to assess the readability. RESULTS: There were poor levels of readability webpages reviewed, with only 17.2% of webpages at a universally readable level. There was a significant difference in readability between the different webpages based on their information source (p < 0.01). Public Health organisations and Government organisations provided the most readable COVID-19 material, while digital media sources were significantly less readable. There were no significant differences in readability between regions. CONCLUSION: Much of the general public have relied on online information during the pandemic. Information on COVID-19 should be made more readable, and those writing webpages and information tools should ensure universal accessibility is considered in their production. Governments and healthcare practitioners should have an awareness of the online sources of information available, and ensure that readability of our own productions is at a universally readable level which will increase understanding and adherence to health guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7661100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76611002020-11-13 Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries Worrall, Amy P. Connolly, Mary J. O’Neill, Aine O’Doherty, Murray Thornton, Kenneth P. McNally, Cora McConkey, Samuel J. de Barra, Eoghan BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The internet is now the first line source of health information for many people worldwide. In the current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, health information is being produced, revised, updated and disseminated at an increasingly rapid rate. The general public are faced with a plethora of misinformation regarding COVID-19 and the readability of online information has an impact on their understanding of the disease. The accessibility of online healthcare information relating to COVID-19 is unknown. We sought to evaluate the readability of online information relating to COVID-19 in four English speaking regions: Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States, and compare readability of website source provenance and regional origin. METHODS: The Google® search engine was used to collate the first 20 webpage URLs for three individual searches for ‘COVID’, ‘COVID-19’, and ‘coronavirus’ from Ireland, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG) Score, Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) score were calculated to assess the readability. RESULTS: There were poor levels of readability webpages reviewed, with only 17.2% of webpages at a universally readable level. There was a significant difference in readability between the different webpages based on their information source (p < 0.01). Public Health organisations and Government organisations provided the most readable COVID-19 material, while digital media sources were significantly less readable. There were no significant differences in readability between regions. CONCLUSION: Much of the general public have relied on online information during the pandemic. Information on COVID-19 should be made more readable, and those writing webpages and information tools should ensure universal accessibility is considered in their production. Governments and healthcare practitioners should have an awareness of the online sources of information available, and ensure that readability of our own productions is at a universally readable level which will increase understanding and adherence to health guidelines. BioMed Central 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7661100/ /pubmed/33183297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Worrall, Amy P. Connolly, Mary J. O’Neill, Aine O’Doherty, Murray Thornton, Kenneth P. McNally, Cora McConkey, Samuel J. de Barra, Eoghan Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries |
title | Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries |
title_full | Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries |
title_fullStr | Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries |
title_short | Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries |
title_sort | readability of online covid-19 health information: a comparison between four english speaking countries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33183297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT worrallamyp readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries AT connollymaryj readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries AT oneillaine readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries AT odohertymurray readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries AT thorntonkennethp readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries AT mcnallycora readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries AT mcconkeysamuelj readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries AT debarraeoghan readabilityofonlinecovid19healthinformationacomparisonbetweenfourenglishspeakingcountries |