Cargando…

Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays

AIM: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-based screening is becoming increasingly important, either by supplementing or replacing the traditional cytology-based cervical Pap smear. However, hrHPV screening lacks specificity, because it cannot differentiate between transient virus infection and cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dippmann, Carolin, Schmitz, Martina, Wunsch, Kristina, Schütze, Stefanie, Beer, Katrin, Greinke, Christiane, Ikenberg, Hans, Hoyer, Heike, Runnebaum, Ingo B., Hansel, Alfred, Dürst, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00963-w
_version_ 1783609155849814016
author Dippmann, Carolin
Schmitz, Martina
Wunsch, Kristina
Schütze, Stefanie
Beer, Katrin
Greinke, Christiane
Ikenberg, Hans
Hoyer, Heike
Runnebaum, Ingo B.
Hansel, Alfred
Dürst, Matthias
author_facet Dippmann, Carolin
Schmitz, Martina
Wunsch, Kristina
Schütze, Stefanie
Beer, Katrin
Greinke, Christiane
Ikenberg, Hans
Hoyer, Heike
Runnebaum, Ingo B.
Hansel, Alfred
Dürst, Matthias
author_sort Dippmann, Carolin
collection PubMed
description AIM: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-based screening is becoming increasingly important, either by supplementing or replacing the traditional cytology-based cervical Pap smear. However, hrHPV screening lacks specificity, because it cannot differentiate between transient virus infection and clinically relevant hrHPV-induced disease. Therefore, reliable triage methods are needed for the identification of HPV-positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in need of treatment. Promising tools discussed for the triage of these patients are molecular diagnostic tests based on epigenetic markers. Here, we compare the performance of two commercially available DNA methylation-based diagnostic assays—GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test—in physician-taken cervical scrapes from 195 subjects. FINDINGS: Both GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test detected all cervical carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The differences observed in the detection rates between both assays for the different grades of cervical lesions (QIAsure Methylation Test: CIN1 26.7%, CIN2 27.8% and CIN3 74.3%; GynTect®: CIN1 13.3%, CIN2 33.3% and CIN3 60%) were not significant. Concerning the false-positive rates, significant differences were evident. For the healthy (NILM) hrHPV-positive group, the false-positive rates were 5.7% for GynTect® and 26.4% for QIAsure Methylation Test (p = 0.003) and for the NILM hrHPV-negative group 2.2% vs. 23.9% (p = 0.006), respectively. When considering hrHPV-positive samples only for comparison (n = 149), GynTect® delivered significantly higher specificity compared to the QIAsure Methylation Test for CIN2 + (87.6% vs. 67.4% (p < 0.001)) and CIN3 + (84.1% vs. 68.2% (p = 0.002)). Overall our findings suggest that DNA methylation-based tests are suitable for the triage of hrHPV-positive women. With the goal to provide a triage test that complements the limited specificity of HPV testing in HPV-based screening, GynTect® may be preferable, due to its higher specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ .
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7661165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76611652020-11-13 Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays Dippmann, Carolin Schmitz, Martina Wunsch, Kristina Schütze, Stefanie Beer, Katrin Greinke, Christiane Ikenberg, Hans Hoyer, Heike Runnebaum, Ingo B. Hansel, Alfred Dürst, Matthias Clin Epigenetics Letter to the Editor AIM: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-based screening is becoming increasingly important, either by supplementing or replacing the traditional cytology-based cervical Pap smear. However, hrHPV screening lacks specificity, because it cannot differentiate between transient virus infection and clinically relevant hrHPV-induced disease. Therefore, reliable triage methods are needed for the identification of HPV-positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in need of treatment. Promising tools discussed for the triage of these patients are molecular diagnostic tests based on epigenetic markers. Here, we compare the performance of two commercially available DNA methylation-based diagnostic assays—GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test—in physician-taken cervical scrapes from 195 subjects. FINDINGS: Both GynTect® and the QIAsure Methylation Test detected all cervical carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The differences observed in the detection rates between both assays for the different grades of cervical lesions (QIAsure Methylation Test: CIN1 26.7%, CIN2 27.8% and CIN3 74.3%; GynTect®: CIN1 13.3%, CIN2 33.3% and CIN3 60%) were not significant. Concerning the false-positive rates, significant differences were evident. For the healthy (NILM) hrHPV-positive group, the false-positive rates were 5.7% for GynTect® and 26.4% for QIAsure Methylation Test (p = 0.003) and for the NILM hrHPV-negative group 2.2% vs. 23.9% (p = 0.006), respectively. When considering hrHPV-positive samples only for comparison (n = 149), GynTect® delivered significantly higher specificity compared to the QIAsure Methylation Test for CIN2 + (87.6% vs. 67.4% (p < 0.001)) and CIN3 + (84.1% vs. 68.2% (p = 0.002)). Overall our findings suggest that DNA methylation-based tests are suitable for the triage of hrHPV-positive women. With the goal to provide a triage test that complements the limited specificity of HPV testing in HPV-based screening, GynTect® may be preferable, due to its higher specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ . BioMed Central 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7661165/ /pubmed/33176878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00963-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Dippmann, Carolin
Schmitz, Martina
Wunsch, Kristina
Schütze, Stefanie
Beer, Katrin
Greinke, Christiane
Ikenberg, Hans
Hoyer, Heike
Runnebaum, Ingo B.
Hansel, Alfred
Dürst, Matthias
Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays
title Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays
title_full Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays
title_fullStr Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays
title_full_unstemmed Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays
title_short Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assays
title_sort triage of hrhpv-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific pcr assays
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00963-w
work_keys_str_mv AT dippmanncarolin triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT schmitzmartina triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT wunschkristina triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT schutzestefanie triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT beerkatrin triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT greinkechristiane triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT ikenberghans triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT hoyerheike triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT runnebaumingob triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT hanselalfred triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays
AT durstmatthias triageofhrhpvpositivewomencomparisonoftwocommercialmethylationspecificpcrassays