Cargando…

An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations

Sanitary risk inspection, an observation protocol for identifying contamination hazards around water sources, is promoted for managing rural water supply safety. However, it is unclear how far different observers consistently identify contamination hazards and consistently classify water source type...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okotto-Okotto, Joseph, Wanza, Peggy, Kwoba, Emmah, Yu, Weiyu, Dzodzomenyo, Mawuli, Thumbi, S. M., da Silva, Diogo Gomes, Wright, Jim A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00339-3
_version_ 1783609206405857280
author Okotto-Okotto, Joseph
Wanza, Peggy
Kwoba, Emmah
Yu, Weiyu
Dzodzomenyo, Mawuli
Thumbi, S. M.
da Silva, Diogo Gomes
Wright, Jim A.
author_facet Okotto-Okotto, Joseph
Wanza, Peggy
Kwoba, Emmah
Yu, Weiyu
Dzodzomenyo, Mawuli
Thumbi, S. M.
da Silva, Diogo Gomes
Wright, Jim A.
author_sort Okotto-Okotto, Joseph
collection PubMed
description Sanitary risk inspection, an observation protocol for identifying contamination hazards around water sources, is promoted for managing rural water supply safety. However, it is unclear how far different observers consistently identify contamination hazards and consistently classify water source types using standard typologies. This study aimed to quantify inter-observer agreement in hazard identification and classification of rural water sources. Six observers separately visited 146 domestic water sources in Siaya County, Kenya, in wet and dry seasons. Each observer independently classified the source type and conducted a sanitary risk inspection using a standard protocol. Water source types assigned by an experienced observer were cross-tabulated against those of his colleagues, as were contamination hazards identified, and inter-observer agreement measures calculated. Agreement between hazards observed by the most experienced observer versus his colleagues was significant but low (intra-class correlation = 0.49), with inexperienced observers detecting fewer hazards. Inter-observer agreement in classifying water sources was strong (Cohen’s kappa = 0.84). However, some source types were frequently misclassified, such as sources adapted to cope with water insecurity (e.g. tanks drawing on both piped and rainwater). Observers with limited training and experience thus struggle to consistently identify hazards using existing protocols, suggesting observation protocols require revision and their implementation should be supported by comprehensive training. Findings also indicate that field survey teams struggle to differentiate some water source types based on a standard water source classification, particularly sources adapted to cope with water insecurity. These findings demonstrate uncertainties underpinning international monitoring and analyses of safe water access via household surveys. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12403-019-00339-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7661424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76614242020-11-13 An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations Okotto-Okotto, Joseph Wanza, Peggy Kwoba, Emmah Yu, Weiyu Dzodzomenyo, Mawuli Thumbi, S. M. da Silva, Diogo Gomes Wright, Jim A. Expo Health Original Paper Sanitary risk inspection, an observation protocol for identifying contamination hazards around water sources, is promoted for managing rural water supply safety. However, it is unclear how far different observers consistently identify contamination hazards and consistently classify water source types using standard typologies. This study aimed to quantify inter-observer agreement in hazard identification and classification of rural water sources. Six observers separately visited 146 domestic water sources in Siaya County, Kenya, in wet and dry seasons. Each observer independently classified the source type and conducted a sanitary risk inspection using a standard protocol. Water source types assigned by an experienced observer were cross-tabulated against those of his colleagues, as were contamination hazards identified, and inter-observer agreement measures calculated. Agreement between hazards observed by the most experienced observer versus his colleagues was significant but low (intra-class correlation = 0.49), with inexperienced observers detecting fewer hazards. Inter-observer agreement in classifying water sources was strong (Cohen’s kappa = 0.84). However, some source types were frequently misclassified, such as sources adapted to cope with water insecurity (e.g. tanks drawing on both piped and rainwater). Observers with limited training and experience thus struggle to consistently identify hazards using existing protocols, suggesting observation protocols require revision and their implementation should be supported by comprehensive training. Findings also indicate that field survey teams struggle to differentiate some water source types based on a standard water source classification, particularly sources adapted to cope with water insecurity. These findings demonstrate uncertainties underpinning international monitoring and analyses of safe water access via household surveys. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12403-019-00339-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2019-12-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7661424/ /pubmed/33195876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00339-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Okotto-Okotto, Joseph
Wanza, Peggy
Kwoba, Emmah
Yu, Weiyu
Dzodzomenyo, Mawuli
Thumbi, S. M.
da Silva, Diogo Gomes
Wright, Jim A.
An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations
title An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations
title_full An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations
title_fullStr An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations
title_short An Assessment of Inter-Observer Agreement in Water Source Classification and Sanitary Risk Observations
title_sort assessment of inter-observer agreement in water source classification and sanitary risk observations
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00339-3
work_keys_str_mv AT okottookottojoseph anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT wanzapeggy anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT kwobaemmah anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT yuweiyu anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT dzodzomenyomawuli anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT thumbism anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT dasilvadiogogomes anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT wrightjima anassessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT okottookottojoseph assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT wanzapeggy assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT kwobaemmah assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT yuweiyu assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT dzodzomenyomawuli assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT thumbism assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT dasilvadiogogomes assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations
AT wrightjima assessmentofinterobserveragreementinwatersourceclassificationandsanitaryriskobservations