Cargando…
Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence
Postcopulatory sexual selection can generate evolutionary arms races between the sexes resulting in the rapid coevolution of reproductive phenotypes. As traits affecting fertilization success diverge between populations, postmating prezygotic (PMPZ) barriers to gene flow may evolve. Conspecific sper...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0071 |
_version_ | 1783609209456164864 |
---|---|
author | Garlovsky, Martin D. Yusuf, Leeban H. Ritchie, Michael G. Snook, Rhonda R. |
author_facet | Garlovsky, Martin D. Yusuf, Leeban H. Ritchie, Michael G. Snook, Rhonda R. |
author_sort | Garlovsky, Martin D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Postcopulatory sexual selection can generate evolutionary arms races between the sexes resulting in the rapid coevolution of reproductive phenotypes. As traits affecting fertilization success diverge between populations, postmating prezygotic (PMPZ) barriers to gene flow may evolve. Conspecific sperm precedence is a form of PMPZ isolation thought to evolve early during speciation yet has mostly been studied between species. Here, we show conpopulation sperm precedence (CpSP) between Drosophila montana populations. Using Pool-seq genomic data we estimate divergence times and ask whether PMPZ isolation evolved in the face of gene flow. We find models incorporating gene flow fit the data best indicating populations experienced considerable gene flow during divergence. We find CpSP is asymmetric and mirrors asymmetry in non-competitive PMPZ isolation, suggesting these phenomena have a shared mechanism. However, we show asymmetry is unrelated to the strength of postcopulatory sexual selection acting within populations. We tested whether overlapping foreign and coevolved ejaculates within the female reproductive tract altered fertilization success but found no effect. Our results show that neither time since divergence nor sperm competitiveness predicts the strength of PMPZ isolation. We suggest that instead cryptic female choice or mutation-order divergence may drive divergence of postcopulatory phenotypes resulting in PMPZ isolation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7661444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76614442020-11-20 Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence Garlovsky, Martin D. Yusuf, Leeban H. Ritchie, Michael G. Snook, Rhonda R. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Postcopulatory sexual selection can generate evolutionary arms races between the sexes resulting in the rapid coevolution of reproductive phenotypes. As traits affecting fertilization success diverge between populations, postmating prezygotic (PMPZ) barriers to gene flow may evolve. Conspecific sperm precedence is a form of PMPZ isolation thought to evolve early during speciation yet has mostly been studied between species. Here, we show conpopulation sperm precedence (CpSP) between Drosophila montana populations. Using Pool-seq genomic data we estimate divergence times and ask whether PMPZ isolation evolved in the face of gene flow. We find models incorporating gene flow fit the data best indicating populations experienced considerable gene flow during divergence. We find CpSP is asymmetric and mirrors asymmetry in non-competitive PMPZ isolation, suggesting these phenomena have a shared mechanism. However, we show asymmetry is unrelated to the strength of postcopulatory sexual selection acting within populations. We tested whether overlapping foreign and coevolved ejaculates within the female reproductive tract altered fertilization success but found no effect. Our results show that neither time since divergence nor sperm competitiveness predicts the strength of PMPZ isolation. We suggest that instead cryptic female choice or mutation-order divergence may drive divergence of postcopulatory phenotypes resulting in PMPZ isolation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition’. The Royal Society 2020-12-07 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7661444/ /pubmed/33070721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0071 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Garlovsky, Martin D. Yusuf, Leeban H. Ritchie, Michael G. Snook, Rhonda R. Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence |
title | Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence |
title_full | Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence |
title_fullStr | Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence |
title_full_unstemmed | Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence |
title_short | Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence |
title_sort | within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garlovskymartind withinpopulationspermcompetitionintensitydoesnotpredictasymmetryinconpopulationspermprecedence AT yusufleebanh withinpopulationspermcompetitionintensitydoesnotpredictasymmetryinconpopulationspermprecedence AT ritchiemichaelg withinpopulationspermcompetitionintensitydoesnotpredictasymmetryinconpopulationspermprecedence AT snookrhondar withinpopulationspermcompetitionintensitydoesnotpredictasymmetryinconpopulationspermprecedence |