Cargando…
The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study
In standard radiomics studies the features extracted from clinical images are mostly quantified with simple statistics such as the average or variance per Region of Interest (ROI). Such approaches may smooth out any intra-region heterogeneity and thus hide some tumor aggressiveness that may hamper p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76310-z |
_version_ | 1783609228764643328 |
---|---|
author | Fontaine, Pierre Acosta, Oscar Castelli, Joël De Crevoisier, Renaud Müller, Henning Depeursinge, Adrien |
author_facet | Fontaine, Pierre Acosta, Oscar Castelli, Joël De Crevoisier, Renaud Müller, Henning Depeursinge, Adrien |
author_sort | Fontaine, Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | In standard radiomics studies the features extracted from clinical images are mostly quantified with simple statistics such as the average or variance per Region of Interest (ROI). Such approaches may smooth out any intra-region heterogeneity and thus hide some tumor aggressiveness that may hamper predictions. In this paper we study the importance of feature aggregation within the standard radiomics workflow, which allows to take into account intra-region variations. Feature aggregation methods transform a collection of voxel values from feature response maps (over a ROI) into one or several scalar values that are usable for statistical or machine learning algorithms. This important step has been little investigated within the radiomics workflows, so far. In this paper, we compare several aggregation methods with standard radiomics approaches in order to assess the improvements in prediction capabilities. We evaluate the performance using an aggregation function based on Bags of Visual Words (BoVW), which allows for the preservation of piece-wise homogeneous information within heterogeneous regions and compared with standard methods. The different models are compared on a cohort of 214 head and neck cancer patients coming from 4 medical centers. Radiomics features were extracted from manually delineated tumors in clinical PET-FDG and CT images were analyzed. We compared the performance of standard radiomics models, the volume of the ROI alone and the BoVW model for survival analysis. The average concordance index was estimated with a five fold cross-validation. The performance was significantly better using the BoVW model 0.627 (95% CI: 0.616–0.637) as compared to standard radiomics0.505 (95% CI: 0.499–0.511), mean-var. 0.543 (95% CI: 0.536–0.549), mean0.547 (95% CI: 0.541–0.554), var.0.530 (95% CI: 0.524–0.536) or volume 0.577 (95% CI: 0.571–0.582). We conclude that classical aggregation methods are not optimal in case of heterogeneous tumors. We also showed that the BoVW model is a better alternative to extract consistent features in the presence of lesions composed of heterogeneous tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7661538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76615382020-11-13 The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study Fontaine, Pierre Acosta, Oscar Castelli, Joël De Crevoisier, Renaud Müller, Henning Depeursinge, Adrien Sci Rep Article In standard radiomics studies the features extracted from clinical images are mostly quantified with simple statistics such as the average or variance per Region of Interest (ROI). Such approaches may smooth out any intra-region heterogeneity and thus hide some tumor aggressiveness that may hamper predictions. In this paper we study the importance of feature aggregation within the standard radiomics workflow, which allows to take into account intra-region variations. Feature aggregation methods transform a collection of voxel values from feature response maps (over a ROI) into one or several scalar values that are usable for statistical or machine learning algorithms. This important step has been little investigated within the radiomics workflows, so far. In this paper, we compare several aggregation methods with standard radiomics approaches in order to assess the improvements in prediction capabilities. We evaluate the performance using an aggregation function based on Bags of Visual Words (BoVW), which allows for the preservation of piece-wise homogeneous information within heterogeneous regions and compared with standard methods. The different models are compared on a cohort of 214 head and neck cancer patients coming from 4 medical centers. Radiomics features were extracted from manually delineated tumors in clinical PET-FDG and CT images were analyzed. We compared the performance of standard radiomics models, the volume of the ROI alone and the BoVW model for survival analysis. The average concordance index was estimated with a five fold cross-validation. The performance was significantly better using the BoVW model 0.627 (95% CI: 0.616–0.637) as compared to standard radiomics0.505 (95% CI: 0.499–0.511), mean-var. 0.543 (95% CI: 0.536–0.549), mean0.547 (95% CI: 0.541–0.554), var.0.530 (95% CI: 0.524–0.536) or volume 0.577 (95% CI: 0.571–0.582). We conclude that classical aggregation methods are not optimal in case of heterogeneous tumors. We also showed that the BoVW model is a better alternative to extract consistent features in the presence of lesions composed of heterogeneous tissue. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7661538/ /pubmed/33184313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76310-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Fontaine, Pierre Acosta, Oscar Castelli, Joël De Crevoisier, Renaud Müller, Henning Depeursinge, Adrien The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study |
title | The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study |
title_full | The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study |
title_fullStr | The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study |
title_short | The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study |
title_sort | importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33184313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76310-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fontainepierre theimportanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT acostaoscar theimportanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT castellijoel theimportanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT decrevoisierrenaud theimportanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT mullerhenning theimportanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT depeursingeadrien theimportanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT fontainepierre importanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT acostaoscar importanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT castellijoel importanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT decrevoisierrenaud importanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT mullerhenning importanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy AT depeursingeadrien importanceoffeatureaggregationinradiomicsaheadandneckcancerstudy |